Click here to Skip to main content
The default search term operator is AND.

You can use brackets, AND, OR, and NOT to improve your search. For example: C# AND NOT(VB or SQL)

A query of a single * will return everything, filtered by any filters.

Filter examples:
Search by Author  author:"author name"
Filter by tag  tag:C# or tag:(C++ or Java)
Wildcard search  use "?" or "*" eg. gr?d or gr*
  
40 Results

Search



Sort by



Match


Rating Range

Advanced Filters:


Page 1 of 2
Page Size: 10 · 25 · 50

Author filtered by: Pawel idzikowski [x]
Article 5 Feb 2013   license: CPOL
How to gain better control over the testing process reducing the amount of test methods in a unit test.
WinXPWin2003VistaVS.NET2003VS2005VS2008C#.NETCF.NETDev, +
Re: Against the methodology by Pawel idzikowski
Forum Message 8 Jan 2013  
at first thanks for the comment. I don't try to convince anybody - this way is better. For me it's better to group all test cases in one place. Otherwise this is a good example for using "yield return
Re: An alternative - NUnit by Pawel idzikowski
Forum Message 7 Jan 2013  
AFAIK an Attribute accepts only constant values. Using the above way you can provide your test case with mocks and other runtime objects.
Article 4 Jan 2013   license: CPOL
How to effectively build modular .NET applications of any size using messages, commands and components of MCM-Framework.Net?
.NET1.0.NET1.1.NET2.0WinXPWin2003VistaVS.NET2003VS2005C#1.0C#2.0, +
Forum Message 30 Dec 2012  
yes, the TestCase.Description property should be a part of the Assert message. However I didn't want to complicate the code with additional statements. The most important thing is the yield return pat
Article 9 Nov 2011   license: CPOL
How to serialize to XML, any generic, derived, or other complex type, which XMLSerializer cannot serialize
.NET2.0WinXPWin2003VistaC#2.0.NET3.0C#3.0WinMobile5.NET3.5XML, +
Re: Fast Reflection? by Pawel idzikowski
Forum Message 19 Sep 2011  
no, I have not tried it yet. SharpSerializer uses standard reflection with PropertyInfo. Quitting dynamic methods has one big advantage - there is no MissingMethodException ;-)
Re: Great work!!! by Pawel idzikowski
Article 14 Aug 2011   license: CPOL
Is it better to serialize types without default constructor with Custom Serializer or a Substitute Pattern? Example of serialization of FontFamily into isolated storage in WP7.
.NET2.0WinXPWin2003VistaTabletPCEmbeddedC#2.0.NET3.0C#3.0WinMobile5, +
Re: What about WPF applications ? by Pawel idzikowski
Forum Message 6 Aug 2011  
Maybe you can catch this exception by subscribing the event AppDomain.CurrentDomain.AssemblyResolve and there you load the missing assembly manually, i.e. Assembly.Load(...). If it does not work, ther
Re: My vote of 5 by Pawel idzikowski
Forum Message 9 May 2011  
thanks! the performance depends on the environment and data being serialized. there is another article comparing SharpSerializer 2.6 with BinaryFormatter:
Re: Guid does not serializes by Pawel idzikowski
Forum Message 8 May 2011  
hi, SharpSerializer 2.8 and above can serialize Guid. the latest version and sources you find on sharpserializer.codeplex.com
Forum Message 18 Nov 2010  
You need to serialize your class including AssemblyVersion, Culture and PublicKeyToken. As Default they will not be included in the type name. (it looks clean in xml, but the drawback is as y
Re: Send binary to server by Pawel idzikowski
Forum Message 13 Oct 2010  
Reason for my vote of 1 under certain circumstances it produces wrong results (see my comment).
Forum Message 13 Oct 2010  
sorry, It's not the ultimate solution. Let's assume there is an assembly Versioning...: "Versioning.MyVersionInfo, Versioning, Version=......, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=......"
Forum Message 13 Oct 2010  
What about more generally? i.e. "typing dark letters on a light background"? If I change the title then your alternate is off topic ;-)
Forum Message 9 Oct 2010  
I give up. there is type caching in my framework but further caching is not possible unless I refactor the whole system. In your Serializer there are only two layers - reading and object creating. in
Forum Message 9 Oct 2010  
hi Mike, however sharpSerializer in my results is better than in yours, but your SilverlightSerializer kicks the ass! I have compared the outputs, because i thought, your class is a fake which makes
Forum Message 7 Oct 2010  
Reason for my vote of 1 it doesn't work for "System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[[System.Int32, mscorlib],[System.String, mscorlib]], mscorlib"
Forum Message 7 Oct 2010  
Sorry, it's wrong. Let's assume, there is a type: type="System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[[System.Int32, mscorlib],[System.String, mscorlib]], mscorlib" The algorithm with string.IndexOf(...)
Forum Message 7 Oct 2010  
Paulo Zemek wrote:marking all your objects as [Serializable] (...) avoids users serializing objects like the ReaderWriterLockSlim it's lik
Forum Message 7 Oct 2010  
hi Paulo, 1) I have never thought of serializing of ReaderWriterLock - it can't work anyway. Sometimes i get feedback, that sharpSerializer can't serialize whole Windows Forms or other Controls.
Tip/Trick 7 Oct 2010   license: CPOL
C#
Forum Message 7 Oct 2010  
hi Chris, only between us "lazy boys";-) - yes, it uses reflection and the types are cached during building of Property classes. Of course the framework could be faster if not the reflection. the p
Page 1 of 2
1 2
First · Prev · Next · Last


Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web04 | 2.6.130513.1 | Last Updated 14 May 2013
Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2013
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid