Click here to Skip to main content
Click here to Skip to main content

Software Design Principles

By , 17 Sep 2013
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.

What are Software Design Principles? 

The design principles are associated to Robert Martin who gathered them in "Agile Software Development: Principles, Patterns, and Practices". According to Robert Martin there are three important characteristics of a bad design that should be avoided:

  • Rigidity - It is hard to change because every change affects too many other parts of the system.
  • Fragility - When you make a change, unexpected  parts of the system break result is  you have to do impact analysis in whole project.  
  • Immobility - It is hard to reuse in another application because it cannot be extricate from the current application.

Open Close Principle 

Software entities like classes, modules and functions should be open for extension but closed for modifications.

Open Close is a generic principle. You can consider it when writing your classes to make sure that when you need to extends their behavior you do not have to change the class but to extend it. The same principle can be applied for modules, packages, libraries. If you have a library containing a set of classes there are many reasons for which you will prefer to extend it without changing the code that was already written (backward compatibility, regression testing). This is why we have to make sure our modules follow Open Closed Principle.

When referring to the classes Open Close Principle can be ensured by use of Abstract Classes and concrete classes for implementing their behavior. This will enforce having Concrete Classes extending Abstract Classes instead of changing them. Some particular cases of this are Template Pattern and Strategy Pattern.

Dependency Inversion Principle

High-level modules should not depend on low-level modules. Both should depend on abstractions.

Abstractions should not depend on details. Details should depend on abstractions.

Dependency Inversion Principle states that we should decouple high level modules from low level modules, introducing an abstraction layer between the high level classes and low level classes. Further more it inverts the dependency: instead of writing our abstractions based on details, the we should write the details based on abstractions.

Dependency Inversion or Inversion of Control are better know terms referring to the way in which the dependencies are realized. In the classical way when a software module (class, framework) need some other module, it initializes and holds a direct reference to it. This will make the 2 modules tight coupled. In order to decouple them the first module will provide a hook (a property, parameter) and an external module controlling the dependencies will inject the reference to the second one.

By applying the Dependency Inversion the modules can be easily changed by other modules just changing the dependency module. Factories and Abstract Factories can be used as dependency frameworks, but there are specialized frameworks for that, known as Inversion of Control Container.

Interface Segregation Principle

Clients should not be forced to depend upon interfaces that they don't use.

This principle teaches us to take care how we write our interfaces. When we write our interfaces we should take care to add only methods that should be there. If we add methods that should not be there the classes implementing the interface will have to implement those methods as well. For example if we create an interface called Worker and add a method lunch break, all the workers will have to implement it. What if the worker is a robot?

As a conclusion Interfaces containing methods that are not specific to it are called polluted or fat interfaces. We should avoid them.

Single Responsibility Principle

A class should have only one reason to change.

In this context a responsibility is considered to be one reason to change. This principle states that if we have two reasons to change for a class, we have to split the functionality in two classes. Each class will handle only one responsibility and on future if we need to make one change we are going to make it in the class which handle it. When we need to make a change in a class having more responsibilities the change might affect the other functionality of the classes.

Liskov's Substitution Principle

Derived types must be completely substituteable for their base types.

This principle is just an extension of the Open Close Principle in terms of behavior meaning that we must make sure that new derived classes are extending the base classes without changing their behavior. The new derived classes should be able to replace the base classes without any change in the code.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

About the Author

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Team Leader Icreon Communication
India India
About 7+ Years of Experience in Design and Developing Windows and Web Application using Microsoft Technology(.Net,C#,ASP.Net,SQL SERVER).

Comments and Discussions

 
GeneralMy vote of 3 PinmemberRohmeo13-Nov-13 3:56 
GeneralMy vote of 3 PinmemberKlaus Luedenscheidt17-Sep-13 18:40 
Questionaka SOLID Pinmembergiantism5417-Sep-13 7:47 
GeneralMy vote of 5 PinmemberSouthmountain17-Sep-13 7:23 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.

| Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web01 | 2.8.140415.2 | Last Updated 17 Sep 2013
Article Copyright 2013 by Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2014
Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid