|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Announcements
Chapters
Services
Feature Zones
|
Introduction to Dynamic MapsIf you have used maps in BizTalk, by now, you must know that maps are used to transform an XML message into another format. I do not intend to go into the details about BizTalk maps here, but in essence, a map is a transformation on your existing data to the output format you desire. In this article, I will illustrate an interesting feature called Dynamic Maps in BizTalk. If you are a C++ fan like me, you would be amazed at the power of polymorphism and how a call to a function, say Quite often in BizTalk, you come across scenarios where you need to transform a message to an output format, which you can decide only after you know some information which is contained in the message itself, like destination recipient. This can be achieved by using maps in the ports itself, but as the number of parties grow and your exception handling requirements kick in, this route has some limitations. This is where dynamic mapping inside orchestrations make sense. ScenarioFor this exercise, I am building an orchestration which identifies the destination party and loads the corresponding map and sends the message to the intended recipient after the desired transformation. For this example, I have two parties ABC and XYZ. A Bird's Eye View of the StepsThese are the steps for implementing our Dynamic Maps. I am assuming a working knowledge of BizTalk for the solution below, as the concept is what I intend to illustrate. You can skip these steps by downloading the source from above.
Getting Down to Business ..I have broken down the process into a series of logical steps. Step 1: Creating your Schemas and Maps ProjectYou need to create a Schema and Maps project. I have all my maps and schemas in a project called Dynamic Maps. I have added three schemas to the project.
The details of the three schemas are as below. The input schema comes in with some basic information. The output schemas differ for the two parties ABC and XYZ. The three schemas are shown below.
Right click on SubscriberInfo in the GenericSchema and do a Quick promotion. This will add a property schema to the BizTalk project. Now we build the two maps. Both the maps use some basic information from the sources schema, and add some additional information on the output side. I have used the Step 2: Signing the DLL with a KeyYou need to have a strong name for this assembly to get it loaded in the toolbox. So create a strong name and sign it. Once you have the strong key generated, reference that in the Assembly Key file value in the project properties. Step 3: Compile and deploy the Maps projectFrom project properties in the Solution Explorer window, deploy the project. Check in GAC to see if the DLL is deployed. Note down the public key token from the file properties in GAC. Step 4: Build the Dynamic Maps orchestrationsAdd a new BizTalk project OrchestrationForDynamicMaps. Create a new Orchestration and name it Orch_DynamicMaps. In the Orchestration View window, create the following variables and messages. Set the value as in the table below. Leave the rest of the values as their default values.
The orchestration built looks as in the figure below. The outline of steps is detailed below. You can download the source and follow the steps conceptually.
Note: In essence, what we have done in the step above is to use the reflection feature in .NET and find the type of the Map. Then we use the variable and invoke the transformation by using the BizTalk internal keyword
Step 5: Testing and OutputYou can drop the two test files and you will get two different outputs for the same file based on changing the subscriber. I have the inputs and outputs as below:
Step 8: A few notes on the outputThe output is self explanatory, and you will notice that for identical inputs except for the party name, the output was different based on the maps used. We used a Points of InterestAlthough in this example we have used a simple Decide shape to figure out which map to load, in real life implementations, this could be a database helper class which returns the name of the map assembly from a SQL database or a similar design. This design is useful since you can add more maps and systems even after the original system has gone live. This is possible because you can add a new subscriber into the database and have a new DLL with the corresponding schema and maps. This provides a loose-coupling which is highly desired in these scenarios. Gotcha'sIn the declaration of the variable ExceptionsA very common exception would be: Error in accessing the part data or one of its fragments.
The part or fragment may not exist in the database.
When this happens, make sure you have both the assemblies deployed and they are present in the GAC. Also check that the ports are created and the Receive port uses an XML transmit pipeline and the Send port uses a pass-through transmit pipeline. If that did not solve the problem, ping me at the BizTalk cafe forums. I would be glad to take a look. History
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||