|
It is. But apparently it's now also an English interjection.
|
|
|
|
|
I am never going to hear the end of it.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
... Yes, it is.[^] 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
A newly married sailor was informed by the navy that he was going to be stationed a long way from home on a remote island in the Pacific for a year.
A few weeks after he got there he began to miss his new wife, so he wrote her a letter. “My love," he wrote “we are going to be apart for a very long time. Already I'm starting to miss you and there's really not much to do here in the evenings. Besides that, we're constantly surrounded by young attractive native girls. Do you think if I had a hobby of some kind I would not be tempted?”
So his wife sent him back a harmonica saying, "Why don't you learn to play this?"
Eventually his tour of duty came to an end and he rushed back to his wife.
"Darling" he said, "I can't wait make passionate love!"
"First let's see you play that harmonica!"
>64
It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,022 4/6*
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
⬛⬛⬛🟨🟨
⬛🟨🟨🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,022 6/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟩🟨🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
🟨⬜⬜🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Lucky guess
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,022 4/6
⬛⬛⬛🟨⬛
🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟨🟨🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,022 4/6
🟨⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟨🟨⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I think Wordle likes making words up.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,022 5/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨🟨⬜
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. -Frederick Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,022 4/6
⬜⬜🟨⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
How do you feel about the trend toward making Windows desktop dialog boxes commit all changes as soon as you make them, and thus forego the OK and Cancel buttons?
I think that the idea that changes are not committed until you click OK, and the idea that you can always back out of unwanted changes by clicking Cancel are time-honored traditions.
They are foundational to the desktop computer user interface and changing this paradigm would be like making octagonal windows instead of rectangular ones. It doesn't make sense.
OK and Cancel buttons are the on-screen analogue of the Enter key and the Escape key. What would a computer be like without an Enter key?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's essential for a keyboard to have a RETURN key—just as it should.
modified 6-Apr-24 8:37am.
|
|
|
|
|
hmmm... I don't think I've seen that.
Real Windows dialogs ? or a 3rd party app dialogs ?
Modal or Modeless dialog ?
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
Many of the "settings" dialogs in Windows 11 have no "OK" button, IIRC. They are applied as soon as one makes a choice.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I hadn't even noticed. I kind of like having the setting take place immediately, especially since I can easily undo it. Also, this isn't a new behavior for Windows Settings. For instance, the classic mouse control panel applet implements changes as soon as you make them and doesn't wait for an OK button.
Now where I would draw the line is if the dialog has the classic Apply/Ok/Cancel buttons. Then it shouldn't make changes until Apply or Ok is clicked.
|
|
|
|
|
In (my corner of) the Linux world, "apps" generally have action buttons in dialogs, but things like settings are often updated on-the-fly without an extra click.
I'm comfortable with that.
veering OT to rant territory...
My current gripe is a Windows app I use at Fire Control.
Double click the desktop icon, fine. Logon splash window opens. Username box highlighted, Ibeam there.
Start typing. NOTHING HAPPENS! Window isn't focused. 
That app has so many UI fails it's unbelievable it got so far in the market.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: How do you feel about the trend toward making Windows desktop dialog boxes commit all changes as soon as you make them, and thus forego the OK and Cancel buttons?
Programming is an art, and like anything creative... it depends.
One of the worst user design experiences is when people use modals for everything. You sneeze... bam... modal! It can take you out the flow and can be tedious. For instance, Did you really mean to close the app? when there's no data to save. What a waste of a click.
And what about for a settings dialog? Does it really have to be atomic? More times than not, you won't make a mistake. And if you did, you can mindlessly click OK with the same mistake. Just the auto save per field means less work. You could make the argument that at least clicking the OK button gives some sorta feeling the setting was saved, and that's true. But it's not much of an indication since most people use that to mean "close" the dialog.
But it's context dependent. If you intend to do an action that's assumed and have a way to recover from it and also let the user intelligently know what happened without disturbing their flow... it's not a bad thing. If you never ask for an atomic confirmation at all... ever... it's a bad thing. It just all depends.
Jeremy Falcon
modified 6-Apr-24 7:40am.
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Falcon wrote: And what about for a settings dialog? Does it really have to be atomic?
In some cases it is even worse if it is atomic. A good example is the drop-down for display resolution. You want to see the result right away. Same for colour selections and other UI adjustments.
As you said: it all depends.
Mircea
|
|
|
|
|
For instance, Did you really mean to close the app? when there's no data to save. What a waste of a click.
With todays trends of fashion over function, I think confirmation is even more important. On modern Windows it is very difficult to se were one application ends and another starts when windows are on top of each other, so I often hit the wrong X and I'm grateful for the confirmation 
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed this too. It's nearly impossible to get windows to have borders that are clearly visible. I really don't understand how this makes windows more usable...other than I've also noticed that many people never learned to use Windows and just full screen EVERYTHING.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not aware of this trend as I have not seen it but in my opinion the concept is hideous.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly which dialogs are you referring to? I have not seen this in any application that I use.
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen it on some settings dialogs... especially on Macs.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
