Click here to Skip to main content

Welcome to the Lounge

   

For lazing about and discussing anything in a software developer's life that takes your fancy.
The Lounge is rated PG. If you're about to post something you wouldn't want your kid sister to read then don't post it. No flame wars, no abusive conduct and please don't post ads.

Technical discussions are welcome, but if you need specific help please use the programming forums.


 
Hint: For improved responsiveness ensure Javascript is enabled and choose 'Normal' from the Layout dropdown and hit 'Update'.
You must Sign In to use this message board.
Search this forum  
    Spacing  Noise  Layout  Per page  Show 
GeneralRe: I think this could go further...memberDalek Dave8 Oct '12 - 0:43 
GeneralRe: I think this could go further...memberSentenryu8 Oct '12 - 0:52 
GeneralRe: I think this could go further...memberMark Wallace8 Oct '12 - 1:40 
GeneralRe: I think this could go further...memberMark Wallace8 Oct '12 - 1:26 
GeneralRe: I think this could go further...memberwizardzz8 Oct '12 - 4:21 
GeneralRe: I think this could go further...memberednrg8 Oct '12 - 8:16 
GeneralDoxygen considered harmfulmemberYvesDaoust7 Oct '12 - 23:54 
For the Nth time in my developer's career, I came across an API which was documented using Doxygen. (For the sake of mercy, I won't name it.)
 
As usual, all you are entitled to is a very terse introductory page, accompanied by the bloody, endless, uninformative Class Reference. As a bonus, you also get that wonderfully useless File List.
 
This way to document software drives me mad. It forces you to scan the whole API before you know if the functionality suits your needs, and gives you no hint on the philosophy of the stuff. This turns the discovery of otherwise valuable products into a painful guesswork and causes the learning curve to raise vertically.
 
I put most of the blame on Doxygen, because it gives programmers a false feeling that they did document their API, and that they did it in a "lush" way. I put the blame on Doxygen because of the poor presentation style it spreads and legitimizes, which favors form over content.
GeneralRe: Doxygen considered harmfulmemberNagy Vilmos8 Oct '12 - 0:04 
GeneralRe: Doxygen considered harmfulmvpEspen Harlinn8 Oct '12 - 0:14 
GeneralRe: Doxygen considered harmfulmemberYvesDaoust8 Oct '12 - 0:20 
GeneralEhhrmm ....mvpEspen Harlinn8 Oct '12 - 1:11 
GeneralRe: Ehhrmm ....memberMark Wallace8 Oct '12 - 1:35 
GeneralRe: Ehhrmm ....memberYvesDaoust8 Oct '12 - 1:49 
GeneralRe: Ehhrmm ....mvpEspen Harlinn8 Oct '12 - 1:54 
GeneralRe: Ehhrmm ....memberMark Wallace8 Oct '12 - 2:08 
GeneralRe: Ehhrmm ....mvpEspen Harlinn8 Oct '12 - 2:19 
GeneralRe: Ehhrmm ....memberYvesDaoust8 Oct '12 - 1:48 
GeneralRe: Ehhrmm ....mvpEspen Harlinn8 Oct '12 - 1:55 
GeneralRe: Ehhrmm ....memberYvesDaoust8 Oct '12 - 1:59 
GeneralRe: Ehhrmm ....mvpEspen Harlinn8 Oct '12 - 2:22 
GeneralRe: Doxygen considered harmfulmemberChris Quinn8 Oct '12 - 0:15 
GeneralRe: Doxygen considered harmfulmemberYvesDaoust8 Oct '12 - 0:22 
GeneralRe: Doxygen considered harmfulmemberEddy Vluggen8 Oct '12 - 0:59 
GeneralRe: Doxygen considered harmfulmemberYvesDaoust8 Oct '12 - 1:46 
GeneralRe: Doxygen considered harmfulmemberMark Wallace8 Oct '12 - 1:32 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   


Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web04 | 2.6.130516.1 | Last Updated 19 May 2013
Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2013
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use
Layout: fixed | fluid