Click here to Skip to main content
11,928,352 members (56,724 online)
Click here to Skip to main content
Add your own
alternative version

Tagged as


153 bookmarked

Anonymus, a New Optimal Language

, 8 Feb 2012 GPL3
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
A new general purpose language that makes programming easier
This is an old version of the currently published article.

Facebook page


I developed this language because I don't find the other languages perfect for the things that I want to do. My problem with C++ is that it's slow to develop in it, and doesn't have such features that C# has, but .NET languages are not native and use CIL. This doesn't allow to use standard x86 assembly and maybe also slower.

I have been working on developing Anonymus since March 2010 in C#. Its performance is competitive with C++ while it will be a high level language. The syntax and libraries are similar to C#, C++, so I don't think it would be hard to learn, but I also change syntax if I think it could be better.

Creating Programs with Anonymus

Some functions are used from BlitzMax modules, because I haven't implemented all of the graphical libraries yet. Some of the sample programs use C++ to compare the performance. To run these, you'll need to install MinGW. To compile the programs written in Anonymus, you should run the “As.exe” which is in the “Binaries” directory. In the command line, you can use options and the others will be the input files. They can be Anonymus files, C, C++, Object files, etc. or libraries which start with "-l". For example:

As.exe -x -lBlitzMax -lAnonymus -format app -out Something.exe

The Anonymus library should be always used. The -x option means that the compiler should run the output file, in this case "Something.exe” file. The output format can be app (.exe), obj (.o), or arc (.a).

1st Sample Program: Squares

This sample draws fading squares. When the mouse is over the square, it appears. I have created some constants and an array that contains the fading rate. The Width and Height variables contain how many squares should be in the graphics window:

using System
using BlitzMax

const var SquareSize = 32,
          Width = 24,
          Height = 20

float[Width, Height] Array

The type doesn't have to be specified, use can use var unlike C# where you can't use var for globals and class members and only one declaration is allowed.

There are two helper functions. The first decreases a value, the second returns true if the mouse is in the specified area:

float Decrease(float Val)
    return if Val < 0.02: 0 else Val - 0.02

bool InArea(int x, y, w, h)
    return x <= MouseX() < x + w and y <= MouseY() < y + h

The Update function updates the squares and draws them. If the mouse is on the square, it draws a white square and sets the fading rate to 1 which means it's fully visible, otherwise it draws with a color based on square's position:

void Update()
    for var x = 0 until Width
        for var y = 0 until Height
            var Value = Array[x, y]
            var XPos = x * SquareSize
            var YPos = y * SquareSize

            if InArea(XPos, YPos, SquareSize, SquareSize)
                Value = 1
                SetColor 255, 255, 255
                DrawRect XPos, YPos, SquareSize, SquareSize

            else if Value > 0
                var Color = 255 * Value
                var Red = (int)(((float)x / Width) * Color)
                var Greed = (int)(((1 - (float)y / Height)) * Color)
                var Blue = (int)(((float)y / Height) * Color)

                SetColor Red, Greed, Blue
                DrawRect XPos, YPos, SquareSize, SquareSize

            Array[x, y] = Decrease(Value)

The Reset function sets the array to zero, because it can contain any data. The Main function creates a graphics window, and updates it until the user hits the escape key or clicks the exit button:

void Reset()
    for var x = 0 until Width
        for var y = 0 until Height
            Array[x, y] = 0

public stdcall void Main()
    Graphics SquareSize * Width, SquareSize * Height

    while !KeyHit(Keys.Escape) and !AppTerminate()

The for until loop is different from for to loop. It doesn't reach the value at the right side, so subtracting one can be saved in some cases.

2nd Sample Program: Signed LEB128 Decoding

LEB128 is used to store numbers without size limits. The first bit of a byte stores 1 if there is another after that byte, otherwise 0. So 7 bits of each byte stores the number. You can learn more at Wikipedia. I created the sample based on the algorithm in that page:

using System
using BlitzMax

byte[4] Bytes
int Position

extern cdecl void CEntry()

byte GetByte()
    : Ret = Bytes[Position]

int DecodeInt(fun byte() GetByte)
     : Result = 0
    var Shift = 0b
    var Byte = 0b

    cycle Byte = GetByte()
          Result |= (int)(Byte & $7F) << Shift
          Shift += 7
          if Byte & $80 == 0: break

    if Shift < sizeof(int) * 8 and (Byte & $40) != 0
        Result |= -1 << Shift

void TestLoop()
    repeat 200000000
        Position = 0
        DecodeInt GetByte

void AsEntry()
    Bytes = [$E5b, $C1b, $C3b, $6Fb]

    Bytes = [$BBb, $D6b, $1Bb, $00b]

public stdcall void Main()

I compared the performance of C#, G++ and Anonymus. These are the results:

Processor C# G++ Anonymus
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.2 Ghz 16,609s 8,993s 8,562s

3rd Sample Program: Circles

In this sample, I calculate the color of each pixel. This sample's aim is also to compare the performance with C++. It calculates the distance from the middle point of the window and it takes the sine and cosine of it. To make it faster, it creates a smaller image that it draws to, and then it's scaled up.

I made some helper functions. The ArgbColor function combines the four components of a color to a single number. The GetDistance function simply calculates a distance, and the Wrap function cuts down parts of a integer that cannot fit in a byte.

The UpdateImagefunction does the main task of the program. It works as I wrote it in the beginning of the sample.

using System
using BlitzMax

int ArgbColor(byte a, r, g, b)
    return (int)a << 24 | (int)r << 16 | (int)g << 8 | b

double GetDistance(double x1, y1, x2, y2)
    var x = x2 - x1, y = y2 - y1
    return Math.Sqrt(x * x + y * y)

byte Wrap(int x)
    if x < 0: x = 0
    if x > 255: x = 255
    return (byte)x

void UpdateImage(IntPtr Image)
    var Pixmap = LockImage(Image, 0, true, true)
    var Width = ImageWidth(Image)
    var Height = ImageHeight(Image)
    var Time = MilliSecs()

    for var x = 0 until Width
        for var y = 0 until Height
            var RelX = (float)x / Width
            var RelY = (float)y / Height
            var Distance = GetDistance(RelX, RelY, 0.5, 0.5) * 3 - (float)Time / 1000

            var Light = (int)((RelY * 100) * Math.Abs(Math.Sin(Distance / 1.5)))
            var Red = (int)((RelX * 255) * Math.Abs(Math.Cos(Distance))) + Light
            var Green = (int)(((1 - RelY) * 255) * Math.Abs(Math.Sin(Distance))) + Light
            var Blue = (int)((RelY * 255) * Math.Abs(Math.Cos(Distance / 3))) + Light

            var Color = ArgbColor(255, Wrap(Red), Wrap(Green), Wrap(Blue))
            WritePixel Pixmap, x, y, Color

    UnlockImage Pixmap, 0

public stdcall void Main()
    Graphics 1024, 720
    var Image = CreateImage(512, 360, 1, -1)

    while not KeyHit(Keys.Escape) and not AppTerminate()
        UpdateImage Image
        DrawImageRect Image, 0, 0, 1024, 720, 0

To increase the performance, you can decrease the size of the image. The FPS of the Anonymus version is 12, and C++ version's FPS is 8 on my computer. So in this sample, it's about 33% faster than C++. And I haven't finished SSE support yet.

Analyzing the Created Assembly Code

The ArgbColor Function

The ArgbColor function takes 4 byte parameters. These are passed in the al, ah, dl, dh registers, in that order. al is the first byte, ah is the second byte of the eax register. The result will be stored in the eax register too.

The ah register will be overwritten, so it copies it to the cl register. Then it clears the high 3 bytes of the eax register by doing a bitwise and on them and shifts the last byte from blue color place to the alpha. It does almost the same with the others.

    mov cl, ah
    and eax, 0xFF
    shl eax, 24
    and ecx, 0xFF
    shl ecx, 16
    or eax, ecx
    movzx ecx, dl
    shl ecx, 8
    or eax, ecx
    movzx ecx, dh
    or eax, ecx

The GetDistance Function

The float numbers can be only stored in memory with FPU, so the parameters will be on the stack. The return value will be on the FPU stack. Anonymus doesn't save the stack pointer to ebp register, it rather uses it to store data, but it makes assembly less readable, because you may don't know the variables' positions. In this function, the parameters starts at esp + 4, because the caller's eip is stored in the stack. It doesn't need to subtract 16 from esp, because no functions are called by GetDistance function.

    fld qword[esp + 20]
    fsub qword[esp + 4]
    fstp qword[esp - 16]
    fld qword[esp + 28]
    fsub qword[esp + 12]
    fstp qword[esp - 8]
    fld qword[esp - 16]
    fmul qword[esp - 16]
    fld qword[esp - 8]
    fmul qword[esp - 8]
    ret 32

The Wrap Function

This is the most simple function. It uses conditional moves. The disadvantage of this is that the cmov instruction's second parameter must be a memory position, and reading memory is slow. But I read the conditional jumps are also slow if we do it a lot because of branch prediction.

    cmp eax, 0
    cmovl eax, dword[_11]
    cmp eax, 255
    cmovg eax, dword[_18]

The Other Functions

I think describing them doesn't make much sense. The only thing I would mention is that in the future, I will add function inlining to improve performance. I suppose G++ does the same.

Some Basic Syntax


The type of integer literals can be specified by a suffix that is a lower case short form of the type name. The hexadecimal numbers have to be upper case in order to distinguish them:

$FFb        '' An unsigned byte
-$1Asb        '' A signed byte
%100        '' A binary number

Structures and Enumerations

Basically, these are the same as C#:

struct Rect
    public float X, Y, Width, Height

    '' Constructor: This is called when a Rect is created
    public Rect(float X, Y, Width, Height)
        this.X = X
        this.Y = Y
        this.Width = Width
        this.Height = Height

    public Rect Copy()
        return new Rect(X, Y, Width, Height)

    public float Area:
        get return Width * Height

    public float GetValue(int x)
        switch x
            case 0: return X
            case 1: return Y
            case 2: return Width
            case 3: return Height
            default return 0

static class Console
    public static void PrintInt(int x)
    public static void PrintLong(long x)
    public static void PrintDouble(double x)

enum Keys
    A = 65, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O
    P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z,
    F1 = 112, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, F11, F12

flag Modifiers
    None = 0
    Shift = 1, Control, Option, System
    Alt = Option, Menu = Option, Apple = System, Windows = System

For the flag type, the automatic value is always multiplied by 2 unlike C#. It adds 1 even if it's declared with Flags attribute. The switch command doesn't need case statements to jump out from the switch.


The tuples allow storing multiple values in a variable with different types. You can write the multiplication of vectors in Anonymus language like this:

type float3 = (float x, y, z)

float3 Cross(float3 a, b)
    return a.y * b.z – a.z * b.y,
           a.z * b.x – a.x * b.z,
           a.x * b.y – a.y * b.x

If I don’t define the float3 type or name the members, they can be identified by numbers:

float, float, float Cross((float, float, float) a, b)
    return a.1 * b.2 – a.2 * b.1,
           a.2 * b.0 – a.0 * b.2,
           a.0 * b.1 – a.1 * b.0

For the simple vector operations (addition, subtraction), you don’t have to call functions, it's enough to write a + b.
If I want to manage the members of the tuple, it's enough to separate the components by commas at the left of the assignment:

float x, y, z
x, y, z = Cross(a, b)

It’s also possible to declare and give values to the variable, but in this case you have to write out the types to be unambiguous:

(var x, var y, var z) = Cross(a, b)

Named and Optional Parameters

This is also the same in C#. This is how BlitzMax.Grapics function looks in Anonymus:

public extern cdecl asmname("_brl_graphics_Graphics")
    IntPtr Graphics(int Width, Height, Depth = 0, Hertz = 60, Flags = 0)

To call it, it's possible to miss the last parameters, or by specifying each parameter individually:

Graphics 800, 600
Graphics Width: 800, Height: 600
Graphics 800, 600, Hertz: 75

Swapping of Variables

It swaps two or more data simple without used temporary variable:

a, b = b, a

Without this, the only way is to declare new variables or create a function that does the swapping, but this is also not perfect because the parameter can be only type. In order to be able to output values in parameters, I use the ref types. When you pass a parameter with ref, you pass the address of the variable, not its value:

void SwapInts(ref int a, b)
    var c = a
    a = b
    b = c

'' Usage:
SwapInts ref a, ref b

In C, pointers are also needed:

void SwapInts(int* a, int* b)
    int c = *a;
    *a = *b;
    *b = c;

// Usage:
SwapInts(&a, &b); 

Function Return Value

Returning with a variable that is created at the beginning of a function is a common case. This function calculates the length of a zero-terminated string where the return command is not necessary:

public static UInt_PtrSize StringLength(char* Str)
    : Ret = 0
    while Str[Ret] != '~0'

It's possible to create multiple variables, in this case the return type will be a tuple.

Referencing Function Written in Other Languages

You can reference them with the extern modifier. The asmname enables you to specify the name that this identifier will have in the compiled code. You can also give the calling convention of the function. Currently, my language supports cdecl, stdcall, and ascall:

public extern cdecl asmname("_brl_polledinput_KeyHit") bool KeyHit(Keys key)

In C, there wouldn't be asmname setting, you need to use it with the full name or declare a macro:

void brl_polledinput_KeyHit(uint KeyCode);
#define KeyHit brl_polledinput_KeyHit

The default function call is ascall that uses eax, edx and ecx for parameters, but passes pointers, classes, etc. first, then the numbers (except the floating point numbers because it's not possible to calculate if they are in general registers). It can also handle high and low byte of the registers that have that variant to store two data in the same register.

Including Assembly in Source Code

Here is an example (System.Math.Truncate from Anonymus library):

public static asm double Truncate(double x)
    fldcw $[_x86Helper.TruncateFPUControlWord]
    fld qword[esp + 4]
    fldcw $[_x86Helper.DefaultFPUControlWord]
    ret 8

As you can see, it's possible to use globals with $[ ]. For function parameters direct location is needed, if I implement it, the code would be less optimal, because not all of the instructions' operand data types are allowed.

Overview of Anonymus's Structure


These can be types, variable or functions. All variables and functions have types. The latter is determined by the return value and the parameter’s type. The variables are also divided into ground. They can be local, global or member of a structure.


They can be found before the declaration (e.g., cdecl, asmname, etc.). They are isolated and stored in a list that will receive a function that does the declaration. For example, if a variable is marked with static, then it will create a global identifier.


These are parsed by different recognizers. It’s possible to create a new or replace one without a large modification in the language. An expression recognizer can recognize more operations. E.g., The Multiplicative recognizes multiplication, division and modulus.
If it succeeded, then it should call the plugin that the recognizer received by parameter.


The plugins can modify the recognized expression. The MultiPlugIn class manages multiple plugin joint work. The type manager plugin’s task is to determine the type of the expressions and do the conversions. The calculator plugin calculates a value if we want to operate with constants.

If the expression recognizer wants to declare a variable, it should call a plugin’s function. If it can’t do this, it gives an error message. The multi plugin redirects the declaration to the compiler plugin, if it exists.


It processes all statements starting with #. You can create a macro or if a condition is true, run another code. There’s a preprocessor plugin that replaces the expressions created by call recognizer to the given expression:

#define min(x, y) if x < y then x else y
#define max(x, y) if x > y then x else y

int Something(int i, j)
    return max(i, j) / min(i, j)

The preprocessor produces this from it:

int Something(int i, j)
    return (if i > j: i else j) / (if i < j: i else j) 


In the Anonymus language, statements that have the same number of whitespace characters belong to a scope. First the compiler creates a global scope, then calls the preprocessor, processes the types and then the functions and variables. These are processed multi-threaded.

In the code, scopes can contain commands that can also contain things. E.g., an if command has an expression which is the condition and one or more code scopes. A function scope is the outermost scope in a function that is also a code scope.


It’s possible to do more architecture that create assembly code. If necessary, it can use a plugin or attach data to identifiers, identifier containers. Currently the x86 architecture is implemented.

A Basic Insight into Code Parsing

The language consists of recognizers, and supporting new languages can be done by replacing recognizers. The functions, types, variables will be available between Anonymus and the new languages. I don't use parser generators, because I think using other software could prevent from implementing some of the functionalities or I would have to do things in a different way.

The CompilerState class has a Language object that contains all recognizers. Here is the Language class:

public abstract class Language : LanguageNode
    public IList<IExprRecognizer> ExprRecognizers;
    public IList<IIdRecognizer> IdRecognizers;
    public IList<ICommRecognizer> CommRecognizers;
    public IList<IModRecognizer> ModRecognizers;
    public IList<INameGenerator> NameGenerators;
    public IList<IResultSkippingHandler> GlobalHandlers;

    public IArgRecognizer ArgRecognizer;
    public IGenericRecognizer GenericRecognizer;
    public IGroupRecognizer GroupRecognizer;

    public IRetValLessRecognizer RetValLessRecognizer;
    public IInnerScopeRecognizer InnerScopeRecognizer;
    public IVarDeclRecognizer VarDeclRecognizer;
    public ITypeDeclRecognizer TypeDeclRecognizer;
    public IConstDeclRecognizer ConstDeclRecognizer;
    public INamespaceDeclRecognizer NamespaceDeclRecognizer;
    public IDeclarationRecognizer DeclarationRecognizer;

    public IGlobalScopeProcessor GlobalScopeProcessor;
    public ICodeFileProcessor CodeFileProcessor;
    public ICodeProcessor CodeProcessor;

String Handling

Anonymus uses StringRange to store strings to avoid a new string allocation when it calls string.Substring. This structure also has functions for bracket handling and other operations. The CodeString structure consists of a StringRange and a reference to CodeFile class that can also manage lines and indents of them. CodeString has a Line field and when its substring is needed, it updates the Line member. Most of the CodeString's methods are just wrapper around StringRange's functions.

The ISkippingHandler interface is used to skip results that are in a string constant or bracket. The recognizers can store data in ResultSkippingManager.Datas, if it's needed. In some cases, it's necessary to make sure that the brackets are not skipped. A bracket recognizer shouldn't skip brackets if ResultSkippingManager.DoNotSkipBrackets is true.

public class BracketRecognizer : LanguageNode, IExprRecognizer,
                IIdRecognizer, IResultSkippingHandler

    public int SkipResult(ref ResultSkippingManager RSM)
        if (!RSM.DoNotSkipBrackets && Helper.GetBracket(RSM.CurrentChar, RSM.Back))
            var Handlers = RSM.SkippingHandlers;
            if (RSM.Back)
                var NewString = RSM.String.Substring(0, RSM.Current + 1);
                var Pos = NewString.GetBracketPos(true, Handlers);
                if (Pos != -1) return Pos;
                var NewString = RSM.String.Substring(RSM.Current);
                var Pos = NewString.GetBracketPos(false, Handlers);
                if (Pos != -1) return Pos + RSM.Current;

        return -1;

So this is the BracketRecognizer class. It has to return an index where the string search should be continued or -1. The GetBracketPos method returns the position of the bracket's pair which the string ends or starts with. If the first parameter is false, the string has to begin with a bracket that looks to the right.

LanguageNode Class and Recognizers

The LanguageNode class contains an array of strings called Operators that it recognizes and another array of strings (LanguageNode.Skip) that it should skip, because the operators, that it has to recognise, is the part of them. E.g., an addition recognizer has +, - operators then the skip array should contain ++, --. The NewLine strings contain which operators need the previous or the next line. E.g., if the line ends with +, then it will continue with the next:

public abstract class LanguageNode
    public DataList Data = new DataList();
    public Language Root;
    public LanguageNode Parent;
    public IList<LanguageNode> Children;
    public IList<IResultSkippingHandler> SkippingHandlers;

    public string[] Operators;
    public string[] SkipFind;
    public string[] Skip;

    public string[] NewLineLeft;
    public string[] NewLineRight;
    public string[] OnlyLeft;
    public string[] OnlyRight;


Recognizations are done in a recursive way. I think it's simple but maybe not the fastest way to parse a code file. To decrease the time spent on string operations, I use my own functions which are optimized for these things and significantly faster, although far more time spent on code generation. Currently my compiler can process 10 000 lines of code in about 900 milliseconds.

An expression recognizer should inherit from this class and IExprRecognizer interface. Recognizers can use Find2 function to determine which operators aren't unary. If the left side of the result ends with an operator or there's nothing, it will ignore that result. When it's not enough to use the LanguageNode.Operators, for example the cast recognizer needs to implement the IFind2Handler interface. The following code is the addition recognizer:

public class AdditiveRecognizer : LanguageNode, IExprRecognizer
    public AdditiveRecognizer()
        Operators = new string[] { "+", "-" };
        NewLineLeft = NewLineRight = Operators;

    public ExprRecognizerRes Recognize
        (CodeString Code, ExprPlugIn PlugIn, ref ExpressionNode Ret)
        var Result = ExprRecognizerHelper.Find2(this, PlugIn.Container, Code.String);
        if (Result.Position != -1)
            var Ch = ExprRecognizerHelper.TwoParamOpNode(Code, Result, PlugIn);
            if (Ch == null) return ExprRecognizerRes.Failed;

            Operator Op;
            if (Result.Index == 0) Op = Operator.Add;
            else if (Result.Index == 1) Op = Operator.Subract;
            else throw new ApplicationException();

            Ret = new OpExpressionNode(Op, Ch, Code);
            return ExprRecognizerRes.Succeeded;

        return ExprRecognizerRes.Unknown;

This still wouldn't be compatible with the NumberRecognizer, because floating point numbers can have e notation (2e+2 = 2 * 102). To solve this problem, the NumberRecognizer adds a result skipper to LanguageNode.SkippingHandlers. ExprRecognizerHelper.Find2 takes a LanguageNode parameter first, which is used to get the skipping handlers from.

The Code Generator

This is most complex part of Anonymus. It is about the third of the whole project. These are major steps it does to compile a function:

  1. Processes expressions
  2. Calculates the expression result storage locations
  3. Calculates the locals' locations
  4. Checks whether there is a need for temporary register (in x86 assembly most instructions can only have one memory operand, some must be either memory location or general register, etc.)
  5. If a temporary register needed restarts the data location allocation, allocates the temporary registers and continues at 2nd point.
  6. Generates assembly (without jumps)
  7. Jump optimizations
  8. Jump replacements

The Jump Optimizations and Replacements

int Fib(int x)
    if x < 2: return 1
    else return Fib(x - 1) + Fib(x - 2)

This function would have the following assembly without jump optimizations:

    push ebx
    push ebp
    mov ebp, eax
    cmp ebp, 2
    jge _26
    mov eax, 1
    jmp _2
    jmp _24
    mov eax, ebp
    dec eax
    call _Fib
    mov ebx, eax
    mov eax, ebp
    sub eax, 2
    call _Fib
    add eax, ebx
    jmp _2
    pop ebp
    pop ebx

The label _26 and _24 are for the condition and the label _2 is for function return. There are some unnecessary jumps and labels that should be deleted:

    push ebx
    push ebp
    mov ebp, eax
    cmp ebp, 2
    jge _26
    mov eax, 1
    jmp _2
    mov eax, ebp
    dec eax
    call _Fib
    mov ebx, eax
    mov eax, ebp
    sub eax, 2
    call _Fib
    add eax, ebx
    pop ebp
    pop ebx

It could save a jump if it does the same as where it jumps to. Unless it is too long, it replaces the jump:

    push ebx
    push ebp
    mov ebp, eax
    cmp ebp, 2
    jge _26
    mov eax, 1
    pop ebp
    pop ebx
    mov eax, ebp
    dec eax
    call _Fib
    mov ebx, eax
    mov eax, ebp
    sub eax, 2
    call _Fib
    add eax, ebx
    pop ebp
    pop ebx

Temporary Register Handling

The IsEqual function needs 3 temporary register to fulfil that the mov instruction can only have one memory operand, and the memory location can't have a memory address:

long* g_Pointers
int g_Index
long g_Value

bool IsEqual()
    return g_Value == g_Pointers[g_Index]
    mov eax, dword[_g_Pointers]
    mov edx, dword[_g_Index]
    mov ecx, dword[eax + edx * 8]
    cmp dword[_g_Value], ecx
    jne _27
    mov ecx, dword[eax + edx * 8 + 4]
    cmp dword[_g_Value + 4], ecx
    jne _27
    mov al, 1
    xor al, al

Condition Assembly Generation

This is the main function for condition assembly generation (Anonymus.CodeGenerator.GetConditionCode):

void GetConditionCode(ExpressionNode Node, int Then, int Else, bool ElseAfterCondition)

The Then and Else are the index of labels. If ElseAfterCondition is

  • True, then the condition is followed by the else scope and the jump's condition is the same as the operator and it jumps to the Then label
  • False, then the condition is followed by the then scope and the jump's condition is negated and it jumps to the Else label
Here is an example:

void WhileTest(bool Loop)
    var a = 0
    while Loop

void DoWhileTest(bool Loop)
    var a = 0

    while Loop
; This is the assembly without jump replacements
    xor edx, edx
    test al, al
    jz _13
    inc edx
    jmp _1

; After jump replacements
    xor edx, edx
    test al, al
    jz _13
    inc edx
    test al, al
    jnz _72

    xor edx, edx
    inc edx
    test al, al
    jnz _76

In the WhileTest function, the condition is followed by the then scope, ElseAfterCondition is false. In the DoWhileTest it's followed by the return command (which happens if the condition is false), the ElseAfterCondition is true.

This is how the and and or operators work:

void While_OrTest(bool x, y, z)
    var a = 0
    while x or y or z

void DoWhile_OrTest(bool x, y, z)
    var a = 0

    while x or y or z

void While_AndTest(bool x, y, z)
    var a = 0
    while x and y and z

void DoWhile_AndTest(bool x, y, z)
    var a = 0

    while x and y and z
    xor ecx, ecx
    test al, al
    jnz _44
    test ah, ah
    jnz _44
    test dl, dl
    jz _7
    inc ecx
    jmp _45

    xor ecx, ecx
    inc ecx
    test al, al
    jnz _50
    test ah, ah
    jnz _50
    test dl, dl
    jnz _50

    xor ecx, ecx
    test al, al
    jz _9
    test ah, ah
    jz _9
    test dl, dl
    jz _9
    inc ecx
    jmp _57

    xor ecx, ecx
    inc ecx
    test al, al
    jz _10
    test ah, ah
    jz _10
    test dl, dl
    jnz _62

In all the while and do-while tests, the last condition remains the same, the ElseAfterCondition is only changed for the first two conditions. For the and conditions, the ElseAfterCondition is false, for the or conditions it's true.

Here is an example that contains both operators:

void While_AndOrTest(bool x, y, z, w)
    var a = 0
    while (x or y) and (z or w)

void DoWhile_AndOrTest(bool x, y, z, w)
    var a = 0

    while (x or y) and (z or w)
    xor ecx, ecx
    test al, al
    jnz _72
    test ah, ah
    jz _11
    test dl, dl
    jnz _70
    test dh, dh
    jz _11
    inc ecx
    jmp _71

    xor ecx, ecx
    inc ecx
    test al, al
    jnz _79
    test ah, ah
    jz _12
    test dl, dl
    jnz _77
    test dh, dh
    jnz _77

Plans and Ideas

Currently the most important plan is to make the language stable and usable. In this version, objects can be created, but inheritance with properties doesn't work, and there's no gc yet. I hope I will be able to implement a proper string class within 2-3 months. This takes much time, because I want to program all libraries in Anonymus, so I have a lot of things to do among operator functions.

Inlined Functions Inside Expressions

This could help to create IEnumerable<T> instances. I would create a recognizer to find commands, and then it would create an inline lambda like function and call it. C# doesn't support even the yield keyword in lamdas.

void Something(int* pInt, int Count)
    AnotherFunction for var i = 0 until Count
                        yield pInt[i]

void AnotherFunction(IEnumerable(:int) list)

New for loops

for var x, y in 0..Width, 0..Height
for var x, y in 0...Width - 1, 0...Height - 1

These cycles mean the same. The first is equivalent to two for until loops, the other is equivalent to two for to loops.


This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The GNU General Public License (GPLv3)


About the Author

Dávid Kocsis
Hungary Hungary
I've been programming for 8 years. My first big project was a remake of a nice bomberman game called Dyna Blaster. When i was little i played a lot with it. Now i'm working on a new programming language and code generator.
I would like to work with someone, so feel free to contact me about it.

You may also be interested in...

Comments and Discussions

Discussions posted for the Published version of this article. Posting a message here will take you to the publicly available article in order to continue your conversation in public.
QuestionGood work Pin
Dusan Paulovic8-Jun-14 20:53
memberDusan Paulovic8-Jun-14 20:53 
QuestionAssembly listing Pin
jojo_dfb27-Feb-13 11:08
memberjojo_dfb27-Feb-13 11:08 
AnswerRe: Assembly listing Pin
Dávid Kocsis27-Feb-13 21:07
memberDávid Kocsis27-Feb-13 21:07 
QuestionIs this a clone of the D programming language? Pin
Koutheir8-Jan-13 5:18
memberKoutheir8-Jan-13 5:18 
AnswerRe: Is this a clone of the D programming language? Pin
Dávid Kocsis29-Jan-13 9:43
memberDávid Kocsis29-Jan-13 9:43 
GeneralRe: Is this a clone of the D programming language? Pin
Koutheir29-Jan-13 9:51
memberKoutheir29-Jan-13 9:51 
GeneralRe: Is this a clone of the D programming language? Pin
Dávid Kocsis30-Jan-13 3:21
memberDávid Kocsis30-Jan-13 3:21 
QuestionAlmost 5... Pin
borax78-Jan-13 3:34
memberborax78-Jan-13 3:34 
AnswerRe: Almost 5... Pin
Dávid Kocsis29-Jan-13 9:37
memberDávid Kocsis29-Jan-13 9:37 
GeneralMy vote of 4 Pin
SeattleC++7-Jan-13 11:38
memberSeattleC++7-Jan-13 11:38 
GeneralRe: My vote of 4 Pin
Dávid Kocsis29-Jan-13 9:47
memberDávid Kocsis29-Jan-13 9:47 
Questiondesigning languages Pin
SeattleC++7-Jan-13 11:38
memberSeattleC++7-Jan-13 11:38 
AnswerRe: designing languages Pin
Dávid Kocsis29-Jan-13 8:45
memberDávid Kocsis29-Jan-13 8:45 
GeneralMy vote of 3 Pin
DanielSheets2-Jan-13 3:01
memberDanielSheets2-Jan-13 3:01 
GeneralRe: My vote of 3 Pin
Dávid Kocsis2-Jan-13 9:41
memberDávid Kocsis2-Jan-13 9:41 
QuestionGreat work Pin
amity20011-Jan-13 19:58
memberamity20011-Jan-13 19:58 
AnswerRe: Great work Pin
Dávid Kocsis1-Jan-13 22:22
memberDávid Kocsis1-Jan-13 22:22 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pin
J. Wijaya12-Nov-12 16:18
memberJ. Wijaya12-Nov-12 16:18 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Dávid Kocsis12-Nov-12 19:47
memberDávid Kocsis12-Nov-12 19:47 
Questionmy vote is 2 Pin
Alex_112-Nov-12 12:28
memberAlex_112-Nov-12 12:28 
AnswerRe: my vote is 2 Pin
abdurahman ibn hattab3-Dec-12 23:04
memberabdurahman ibn hattab3-Dec-12 23:04 
Question3D graphics is about 1.5-2 times slower in C# than in C++? Pin
Mihai Maerean11-Nov-12 23:12
memberMihai Maerean11-Nov-12 23:12 
AnswerRe: 3D graphics is about 1.5-2 times slower in C# than in C++? Pin
Dávid Kocsis12-Nov-12 4:55
memberDávid Kocsis12-Nov-12 4:55 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pin
mr.smart29-Sep-12 3:39
membermr.smart29-Sep-12 3:39 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Dávid Kocsis29-Sep-12 10:27
memberDávid Kocsis29-Sep-12 10:27 
GeneralMy vote of 2 Pin
Galatei24-Sep-12 12:46
memberGalatei24-Sep-12 12:46 
GeneralContribution Pin
A. Rajesh Kumar24-Sep-12 8:21
memberA. Rajesh Kumar24-Sep-12 8:21 
GeneralRe: Contribution Pin
Dávid Kocsis25-Sep-12 8:58
memberDávid Kocsis25-Sep-12 8:58 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pin
RomTibi23-Sep-12 9:23
memberRomTibi23-Sep-12 9:23 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Dávid Kocsis23-Sep-12 10:24
memberDávid Kocsis23-Sep-12 10:24 
QuestionI am intrigued Pin
Oleg Shilo23-Sep-12 0:59
memberOleg Shilo23-Sep-12 0:59 
AnswerRe: I am intrigued Pin
Dávid Kocsis23-Sep-12 10:24
memberDávid Kocsis23-Sep-12 10:24 
QuestionBird thoughts Pin
mfc10220-Aug-12 10:00
membermfc10220-Aug-12 10:00 
AnswerRe: Bird thoughts Pin
Dávid Kocsis21-Aug-12 11:11
memberDávid Kocsis21-Aug-12 11:11 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pin
pasztorpisti20-Aug-12 4:57
memberpasztorpisti20-Aug-12 4:57 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Dávid Kocsis20-Aug-12 21:37
memberDávid Kocsis20-Aug-12 21:37 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
pasztorpisti20-Aug-12 22:14
memberpasztorpisti20-Aug-12 22:14 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Dávid Kocsis21-Aug-12 11:02
memberDávid Kocsis21-Aug-12 11:02 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
pasztorpisti21-Aug-12 11:46
memberpasztorpisti21-Aug-12 11:46 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Dávid Kocsis21-Aug-12 21:09
memberDávid Kocsis21-Aug-12 21:09 
QuestionC# is native Pin
GerhardKreuzer24-Jul-12 3:10
memberGerhardKreuzer24-Jul-12 3:10 
AnswerRe: C# is native Pin
Dávid Kocsis24-Jul-12 4:45
memberDávid Kocsis24-Jul-12 4:45 
QuestionC++ is slow? Pin
Vitaly Tomilov18-Jul-12 9:54
memberVitaly Tomilov18-Jul-12 9:54 
AnswerRe: C++ is slow? Pin
Dávid Kocsis18-Jul-12 11:59
memberDávid Kocsis18-Jul-12 11:59 
GeneralRe: C++ is slow? Pin
Fabian Tamp22-Jul-12 21:03
memberFabian Tamp22-Jul-12 21:03 
GeneralRe: C++ is slow? Pin
Dávid Kocsis22-Jul-12 23:56
memberDávid Kocsis22-Jul-12 23:56 
GeneralThanks for sharing Pin
Somnath_Mali17-Jun-12 21:15
memberSomnath_Mali17-Jun-12 21:15 
GeneralDownload Pin
Dávid Kocsis16-Jun-12 20:55
memberDávid Kocsis16-Jun-12 20:55 
GeneralMy vote of 5 Pin
SoMad16-Jun-12 20:04
memberSoMad16-Jun-12 20:04 
GeneralRe: My vote of 5 Pin
Dávid Kocsis16-Jun-12 20:50
memberDávid Kocsis16-Jun-12 20:50 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Praise Praise    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.

| Advertise | Privacy | Terms of Use | Mobile
Web01 | 2.8.151126.1 | Last Updated 8 Feb 2012
Article Copyright 2011 by Dávid Kocsis
Everything else Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2015
Layout: fixed | fluid