Some myths of 'Textbook-TDD', and why they are wrong

Revisions

Compare	Revision	Minor	Date	Status	Editor
	publicly available	No	23 Jan '13 - 11:30	Available	Sean Ewington
Updates in content. 205 changes had been made.
	1	No	22 Jan '13 - 15:59	Draft	Thomas Weller

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

About the Author

Thomas Weller

Software Developer (Senior) Freelancer

Germany

Member

Follow on Twitter

I'm a freelance software developer/architect located in Southern Germany with 10+ years of experience in C++, VB, and C# software projects. In the last few years I do all my coding exclusively in C#.
I am especially dedicated to Test-driven development, OO architecture, and software quality assurance issues and tools.

A Technical Blog, originally posted at http://blog.thomas-weller.de/archive/2011/10/31/some-myths-of-textbook-tdd-and-why-they-are-wrong.aspx

During the last months, I was (for some reasons that are not related to programming) working for a dev shop where software development was done the 'traditional' way: You just write your application's production code, do it as good as you can, and hopefully it will be good enough and no problems wil

Type	Technical Blog
Licence	CPOL
First Posted	23 Jan 2013
Views	3,652
Bookmarked	0 times

TDD

		9,886,267 members (38,727 online) Visit CodeProject.TV Discuss CodeProject.TV Sign in Email Password Forgot your password? Sign in using