 |
|
|
|
|
|
if U go further... they are all a layer to make the real ultimate language: assembler!!!
Hurra for assembler!!!
But I'm lazy, so I don't develop in assembler. And as I'm stupid, I'm sick of using pointers, so develop in C# 
Paillave
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | 5.00/5 (1 vote) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
func MicroSoft
bigBrother:
push Vista
test os, vista
jne bigBrother
push c_sharp
end Microsoft ; ????
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | 5.00/5 (1 vote) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I jumped ship to Delphi when it was first released, stayed with it for seven years then jumpt to C#. Haven't looked back since. 
Andy
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jump from MFC to .net/c# glad to see the back of MFC after spending so many years with it.
.net is a box of never ending treasures, every day I get find another gem.
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's not the language it's the ability of a non computer proficient user to able able to learn VB then consider themselves programmers, hence badly designed code and user interfaces. I've seen this happen in many project during the '90s. I also found VB too restrictive and the syntax somewhat clumsy, but hey thats my opinion. c# seems to address the needs where C++ required heavy costumisation of the UI, with MFC and other frameworks it was a slow and labourious process to constuct a rich UI. C++ is great for backend and critical processing of data.
.net is a box of never ending treasures, every day I get find another gem.
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | 5.00/5 (2 votes) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed, As a programmer that works in a hospital I have seen my share of poorly constructed VB programs. It looks like some companies farm their entire project out to a single 10 year old programmer and then go on to sell their product at $2500 a seat while management laughs all the way to the bank.
John
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | 5.00/5 (1 vote) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah that's coincidental, I've seen Hospitals, Airports, Manufacturing all failed attempts at recreating complex business management systems. It seems the choice of choosing VB was the labour costs are alot cheaper than professional programmers/software engineers.
.net is a box of never ending treasures, every day I get find another gem.
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have to agree! I have seen some POORLY written C# applications as well as horrific Classic ASP pages. Poor programmers can get their bad practices and even worse code applied to just about ANY programming/scripting language!
JamminJimE
Microsoft Certified Application Developer
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We made the error in 1997 of believing vb was the tool to make our project, ms did whatever was necessary to make us belive in VB, and so we did it, ive spent last 3 years porting and normalizing code to move out to c++, probably next year it will be all finished, im talking about around a million lines of code, lots and lots of functionality, but this time, im not using any .net monstrosity.
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan Rodriguez wrote: made the error in 1997 of believing vb
Jan Rodriguez wrote: but this time, im not using any .net monstrosity
So back in 1997 you were using .net? or I am reading this wrong?
.net is a box of never ending treasures, every day I get find another gem.
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, I think he meant that he was using vb back in 1997. .NET wasn't around at that time 
WM.
What about weapons of mass-construction?
"What? Its an Apple MacBook Pro. They are sexy!" - Paul Watson
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think you are reading wrong. He says they did a huge project using VB that they started in 1997. in 2004 they find out that if they want to survive they have to move, because MS decided to kill theirs support to VB. Off course after that bad experience no one want to go back with MS and follow them in their new trend. That is why he says: "but this time, im not using any .net monstrosity"
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | 5.00/5 (1 vote) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ofcourse you read it wrong
Probably he mean, he chose VB6 in 1997...
As the other threads states, C++ is useful for Critical Implementations, Ever growing functionalities & code, Ever Maintained Projects which goes beyond Programming Languages... something thats was started at 90s now getting converted to VB.NET/C#.NET apps (this excludes few time updated personal software like budget planning, birthday tracking etc.,).
VB in any form is somewhat uncomfortable (but not completely) to write million lines of code or 1000s of functionalities...
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Were doing our GUI-Software mostly via C++ with MFC-use and we have tried one C#-Solution and it makes a lot of additional working and testing.
But nobody wont to blame C#, I am uppset about this dishonisty. 
I think MS will drop MFC/C++ Development to push people to .net, so in future we will have to make a decision whether using C# or another class library as QT (Trolltech).
Greetings from Germany
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont think ms will remove suport for unmanaged c++ compiling, i dunno about MFC, i saw their last move trying to mix ATL and MFC in a desperate attempt to save MFC, even if it meant breaking a bit of ATL.
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
KarstenK wrote: I think MS will drop MFC/C++ Development to push people to .net, so in future we will have to make a decision whether using C# or another class library as QT (Trolltech).
hopefully we'll be able to use QT and boost libraries or something alike and c++ will always be
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think sticking to C/C++ will be worth it, because you can successfully target other platforms like Linux and MacOs.
But most of all: I love programming C++ 
Greetings from Germany
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | 5.00/5 (1 vote) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have a few applications that haven't been given the okay to upgrade, port over, or just abandon all together. I actually spend quite a bit of time tweaking these applications to meet new demands from our users.
Personnally I would be happy to just be done with it all together, even though I'm thankful for all the experience that I've gotten from working with the applications.
An American football fan -
Go Seahawks!
Lil Turtle
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's our case too. Wishing for those apps to die, but it just seems like they never will...
Enhance the trance
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We (ok, at my _previous_ work, i dont technically have one now) had a VB.Net application that was no longer being developed, just maintained. All new things done in C#.
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its the only VB I deal with, we have a couple little Access Forms applications, which are of course in VBA.
|
| Sign In·View Thread·PermaLink | |
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Question 
Answer 
Joke 
Rant 
Admin 
Suggest a survey
