Click here to Skip to main content

Survey Results

The size of the .NET redistributable.   [Edit]

Survey period: 4 Jun 2001 to 10 Jun 2001

What is the maximum acceptable size for the .NET redistributables? (For reference: W2K SP2 - 100Mb, Netscape 6 - 16Mb, Java 2 RE - 7.4Mb, Adobe Acrobat - 5.2Mb)

OptionVotes% 
< 1.44Mb2710.5527 votes, 10.55%
< 5Mb4818.7548 votes, 18.75%
5-10Mb4316.8043 votes, 16.80%
10-15Mb176.6417 votes, 6.64%
15-20Mb155.8615 votes, 5.86%
20Mb+145.4714 votes, 5.47%
It's irrelevant, as long as it fits on a CD and doesn't take up too much of my HD6023.4460 votes, 23.44%
I'm never going to install it - so it's a moot point.3212.5032 votes, 12.50%



 
GeneralMFC looks sexy!! PinmemberAnonymous5-Jun-01 7:40 
GeneralRe: MFC looks sexy!! PinmemberAnonymous5-Jun-01 7:47 
GeneralRe: MFC looks sexy!! PinmemberTomasz Sowinski5-Jun-01 7:53 
GeneralRe: MFC looks sexy!! PinmemberChristian Graus5-Jun-01 21:26 
GeneralRe: MFC looks sexy!! PinmemberJim A. Johnson6-Jun-01 16:57 
GeneralRe: MFC looks sexy!! PinmemberAlex Taylor6-Jun-01 17:00 
GeneralRe: MFC looks sexy!! PinmemberChris Meech8-Jun-01 10:27 
GeneralRe: MFC looks sexy!! PinmemberChristian Graus8-Jun-01 14:16 
GeneralWhy should .NET be a redistributable? PinmemberChristian Skovdal Andersen5-Jun-01 7:03 
GeneralRe: Why should .NET be a redistributable? PinmemberAnonymous5-Jun-01 7:35 
GeneralRe: Why should .NET be a redistributable? PinmemberChristian Graus5-Jun-01 15:21 
GeneralRe: Why should .NET be a redistributable? PinmemberUlf5-Jun-01 20:19 
It probably depends on how often .NET will be updated after the initial release. For instance, I always distribute MDAC, because there are so many versions and mixed pieces of different versions floating around on people's computers.
 
> it will be something that people download once or install
> with IE/Service packs etc.
 
Once? Really? I wish I could share your optimism Smile | :)
 
--------------
"Criticism is often constructive because it makes you feel superior when you give it"
-- Dogbert
GeneralRe: Why should .NET be a redistributable? PinmemberNorm Almond6-Jun-01 4:35 
GeneralRe: Why should .NET be a redistributable? PinmemberAlex6-Jun-01 3:02 
GeneralRe: Why should .NET be a redistributable? PinmemberJoseph Dempsey6-Jun-01 3:57 
GeneralIrrelevant because don't use it! PinmemberAjit Jadhav4-Jun-01 7:33 
GeneralRe: Irrelevant because don't use it! PinmemberEarl Rex Arao-arao4-Jun-01 17:45 
GeneralRe: Irrelevant because don't use it! PinmemberRussell Morris5-Jun-01 7:31 
GeneralRe: Irrelevant because don't use it! PinmemberAjit Jadhav5-Jun-01 8:42 
GeneralRe: Irrelevant because don't use it! PinmemberKannan Kalyanaraman6-Jun-01 21:53 
GeneralIt's irrelevant, as long as it fits on a DVD PinmemberStephen Kellett4-Jun-01 6:15 
GeneralRe: It's irrelevant, as long as it fits on a DVD PinmemberTomasz Sowinski4-Jun-01 9:04 
GeneralNo F'in way... PinmemberChris Losinger4-Jun-01 4:33 
GeneralRe: No F'in way... PinmemberChris Maunder4-Jun-01 5:16 
GeneralRe: No F'in way... PinmemberChris Losinger4-Jun-01 5:20 

General General    News News    Suggestion Suggestion    Question Question    Bug Bug    Answer Answer    Joke Joke    Rant Rant    Admin Admin   

Use Ctrl+Left/Right to switch messages, Ctrl+Up/Down to switch threads, Ctrl+Shift+Left/Right to switch pages.


Advertise | Privacy | Mobile
Web01 | 2.8.141216.1 | Last Updated 10 Aug 2007
Copyright © CodeProject, 1999-2014
All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service
Layout: fixed | fluid