Click here to Skip to main content
15,868,141 members

Comments by MrKBA (Top 5 by date)

MrKBA 22-Apr-13 4:51am View    
yes.thank you
MrKBA 22-Apr-13 4:51am View    
Deleted
yes.thank you
MrKBA 18-Apr-13 5:04am View    
So conclusion, it is impossible to ensure this ?
And caller should have at least the new version of COM to works ?
MrKBA 17-Apr-13 12:31pm View    
sorry for that
Normally the backward compatibility was planed to ensure that if one soft is compiled for an old version of the library, it can continue to work with the new higher version of the library without recompilation or special adaptation.(situation 1)

is the reverse also true?

means if the soft is compiled with the new higher version of dll it can continue to work with the old version of the library without recompilation or special adaptation.(situation 2)

My situation is the first one, So I ask if should I have also situation 2 works ?
MrKBA 17-Apr-13 12:27pm View    
sorry for that
Normally the backward compatibility was planed to ensure that if one soft is compiled for an old version of the library, it can continue to work with the new higher version of the library without recompilation or special adaptation.(situation 1)
is the reverse also true?
means if the soft is compiled with the new higher version of dll it can continue to work with the old version of the library without recompilation or special adaptation.(situation 2)
my situation is the first one, So I ask if should I have also situation 2 works ?