|
When I go to Articles | Search I just get a "Page Title Goes Here" page.
|
|
|
|
|
"This is not the search you are looking for".
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Sometimes the little orange dots indicate that a forum has new posts, but the first page of the forum does not contain said posts.
Perhaps we could have a button that brings us to the page of the new posts?
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest way to find the new posts at the moment is to use the forum's search box, and search for * - that will list all of the posts in the forum in descending date order.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It just happened again that an article got approved when it shouldn't have (ref.: Re: Plagiarised would be article - CodeProject[^]).
Suggestion: Once an article in moderation got 1 report of being spam or plagiarized don't publish it after it received 10 approvals but place it in a queue to be decided upon by a protector.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
In this specific case the article (at least according the revision history) never got published...It went from 'pending' to 'closed'...
In any case I would say to notify all those approved an article
1. If already has a spam/plagiarized flag on the article - to let him review it more
2. If approved and later someone flag it as spam/plagiarized
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter wrote: In this specific case the article (at least according the revision history) never got published...It went from 'pending' to 'closed'...
At least one submission got published - I reported it.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Why I am not receiving any email notification? My email is correct and I am accessing it every day?
Thanks,
Jassim[^]
Technology News @ www.JassimRahma.com
|
|
|
|
|
Have you checked your profile settings or tried resubscribing?
|
|
|
|
|
I checked but I did not try resubscribing..
I will do that...
Technology News @ www.JassimRahma.com
|
|
|
|
|
Deactivated users should be able to login the system with following limited privileges:
1. They should be able to discuss why they were deactivated and appeal against the decision
2. They should be able to delete their articles
|
|
|
|
|
panboza wrote: 1. They should be able to discuss why they were deactivated and appeal against the decision
They can email the CP Admin to do this. There is no need to keep a dead account available.panboza wrote: 2. They should be able to delete their articles
The CP team can do this.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
The ways to contact the CP Admin about those subjects should be mentioned in closing message.
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't know what was in the closing message - I've never done anything worthy of having my account closed, or articles rejected.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
We can arrange a closing message for you, if you are interested... 
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Fill your boots mate.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
webmaster@codeproject.com
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The author of the rejected article should be able to talk about the reasons why the article was rejected with the moderators.
|
|
|
|
|
How would this work? Would the author be contacting the people who rejected the article (there are lots of people who have the privilege)? A better bet is to raise the issue in the Article Writing forum.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
There was considerable discussion (including comments at your your article) which it seems you did not join in with.
Just repost with some new 'contents' ? - CodeProject[^]
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
modified 9-Feb-16 9:32am.
|
|
|
|
|
Your link doesn't point to a specific thread or message, just a page on the forum.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Amended.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Member Profile - CodeProject[^]
This member posted a joke, that had the exact bearing of a spam, and for that the post and the account removed...
I think that in this case it would be appropriate to reopen the account...
Your call @chris-maunder...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Ironically, it was spam. Who knew? Oh wait, those of us who voted to have it closed in the first place. 
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Yes...Our senses worked well after all...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
