|
Now with added "reasons why I think it's spam" display.
Like it! 
If nothing else, it gives the more anally retentive amongst us (such as myself) something to stroke our beards over... 
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome.
Still needs improving, but it's a start (and has already highlighted an algorithm issue to us)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Edit: Initial comment a bit harsh. I am of the honest opinion that this may not be working as planned. 
I know you are aware of this, but really, nothing I post should be marked as spam, if you think about it. --> No comment required. 
modified 7-Jul-15 16:41pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Auric Goldfinger wrote: I know you are aware of this, but really, nothing I post should be marked as spam
Is this the "high rep members don't post spam" argument? I would give you counter-examples if it wasn't a breach of decency.
[Edit: send me a link to the message that was pipped. We can now see more clearly why the message was marked as spam]
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 8-Jul-15 0:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auric Goldfinger wrote: Question though, if the flagged message goes into moderation, who/what says it is ok?
A dedicated team of hamsters (called moderators) was called into action to handle those messages. They read every one of them very carefully and dissect the message to determine whether or not it's spam.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Deketelaere wrote: They read every one of them
Wow! What an important job. 
|
|
|
|
|
Interstingly it was the word "succumb" that triggered it. It's a word not used that often and given the rest of your message was so brief the spam filter decided better safe than sorry.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting, indeed.
Thanks for replying. I won't post any more issues with this...I sort of promise.
|
|
|
|
|
If you don't tell us what's wrong we can't fix it
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi dear
At this time, I wanted to publish an article. But the text editor does not appear! and checked it out in any browser (Chrome, IE, Firefox)...
Please help me... of fix this bug asap.
regards
Dariush Tasdighi
Dariush Tasdighi
http://www.IranianExperts.com Web Master
|
|
|
|
|
It works fine in Chrome for me. Maybe it would help if you post the link that is not working for you.
|
|
|
|
|
Have you tried hitting Ctrl+F5?
It's working fine for me.
[Edit: There was an issue after all. Found, fixed, deployed]
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 8-Jul-15 0:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
In articles forums,
When a notification lead to a post that is the first of page 2, it fail.
CP simply display the article with page 1 of forum ans stops here instead of jumping to the post.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
Link?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately,
Notification links disappear after usage.
And the problem only show id the message is #1 on page 2
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I assumed that , to prevent plagiarized article being published here, Moderators do extensive due diligence before approving the article. But For some reason, mine was approved in few minutes after informing Sean about image issue. Sean answered that he cannot fix the issues on pending status. So my question is, does it not make sense to put the article back in moderation queue after Sean fixed the bug?
I am not complaining, actually I was pleasantly surprised at fast approval and just wanted to make sure,there is no loophole for article to be published ,when image issue happens.
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Do ... do you want me to check your article for plagiarism? :p
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Lol, You can if you want to but there is nothing to find. 
I posted this question because I felt , my earlier joke about fast article approval would be misused by others
cheers,
Super
------------------------------------------
Too much of good is bad,mix some evil in it
|
|
|
|
|
Every few days, the site seems to forget my settings - the layout gets reset to "fixed", the forum display options are reset to the default, and the "email me" and "allow private email" options are re-selected.
Is there a bug lurking somewhere, or is it just me?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I find that if you visit one of the forums without being logged in it will randomise the forum display messages. When I then log-in it keeps these random settings rather than loading my saved ones. Perhaps this is what you are seeing?
|
|
|
|
|
Nope - I'm always logged in.
Apart from a brief bug at the end of May, I don't think I've been logged out since 2002.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I don't think I've been logged out since 2002.
That's more or less how I use the site. I have noticed on a couple of occasions that the forum appearance sttings changes, but not the other issues. Maybe a cookie gets trashed by some other process.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I don't think I've been logged out since 2002.
You've had the same machine since then?
|
|
|
|
|
No, but I've transferred the browser profile between machines.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
