|
Not sure if already reported, and too lazy to check right now, sorry 
My red indicator shows "1" but when I hover the mouse I get a list with 5 items.
IE and FF same behaviour
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For me is not missing (most of the time), it just shows a number, that has nothing to do with the real quantity.
But yes, it seems to be the same bug
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect there's a caching issue involved. I've just seen a notification flag for the first time this week, and I don't have any unread notifications. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Don't get any notifications since about last Monday. And yes there where comments to some of my Posts 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Is "Personal Forum For Member CodeProject Authors" supposed to be there? It's locked, so it doesn't seem to serve any purpose.
CodeProject Authors - Professional Profile[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Ugh. Set the wrong flag when making that board. It'll slip away quietly in a few.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Or this bug is peculiar to noone else but me. Filter now can't be cleared.
Steps to reproduce behavior:
1. Go to QA.
2. Observe filtered-by text box content (the bug "Interested" -> "C#2.0, C#3.0, C#, C#4.0, C#3.5, C#5" & "Ignored" -> "(e.g. Homework,LOLCode)".
3. Highlight content of both, hit delete, hit update.
4. OK, not "Ignored" ... (but LOLCode? Come on, really?)
5. Hit "Update" (see that "Interested" becomes the old cp liverbird "(e.g. C++, VB)")
5. Change to another webpage, then return to QA.
6. See that the Filter has reverted to the bug (as described above).
modified 15-Nov-18 17:38pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't mean the watermark, do you?
(and LOLCode was a tag at one point)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Right, I guess it is a "watermark". But, as in this image, "Interested" is "(e.g C++, VB)" and it's behavior, which is the old behavior and the good behavior, upon update, REMOVES all filters.
Focusing then on just "Interested" ... when navigating away from the page and then returning to the page, the NO-FILTER behavior where all the posts are shown is no longer exhibited. SO there's two things that have changed. One -> after update, anything as a watermark exhibits active FILTER (which I don't want ... from a default watermark, right). Two -> I can't return to a NO-FILTER condition under any circumstance.
modified 15-Nov-18 17:39pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Here's what I see, the good:
And the bad:
The second one persists and in order to get all posts I have to manually clear the control everytime I return to the page. Notice how there are no parentheses in that new watermark. Nor is there a "e.g" signifying the default condition.
Also please note that any NEXT movement through the returns reapplies the bad filter. So no NEXT page is really available.
modified 15-Nov-18 18:24pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Should be better now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I have 19 articles on Codeproject. I can configure the "Email Alerts" in all articles except 4 of them:
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/15397/Cabinet-File-CAB-Compression-and-Extraction
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/6136/Type-safe-Callbacks-in-C
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/6780/Type-safe-Signals-and-Slots-in-C-Part-2
https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/12200/DHTML-Editor-with-Table-Support-and-Source-Editor
Only in these 4 articles the second checkbox "Replies to posts" is disabled.
I looked into the HTML source code and I find:
<input disabled="disabled" id="ctl00_MessageBoard_SubscribeReplies" type="checkbox">
<label for="ctl00_MessageBoard_SubscribeReplies">Replies to Posts</label><br>
As you see the server already sends it as disabled="disabled"
Would you please fix this?
I cannot see any sense why this checkbox should ever be disabled.
|
|
|
|
|
If you choose a daily notification schedule you only get new posts, not all replies
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Once again, I want to submit a request for a new major forum section, called "Linux Development", and within this section, have the following forums.
- Python
- GTK+
- QT
- C++
- Mono
- Database
This request is *not* satisfied by the existing forum under Web Development called "Linux Apache, MySQL, PHP". In point of fact, the current web dev forum for LAMP could also be moved to the new section as a move to consolidate all Linux dev into one section.
As we all know (or at least should know), development for the Linux desktop is wildly different from Windows desktop development.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Will there be enough posts?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I can't tell the future, of course.
If you decide at a later date that the traffic isn't high enough to warrant the maintenance time required, you can certainly eliminated the forums.
I realize this is primarily a Windows-oriented site, but you do have mobile-oriented forums, so I figured Linux forums wouldn't be a leap too far. Besides that, there's nothing at all wrong with helping devs explore other environments.
(BTW, I ddn't get a notification that you had responded to my original post.)
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
We do get a lot of .NET articles but we're primarily a developer site, and that includes all technologies.
OK, so let's give it a go [^] and see.
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 19-Nov-18 9:53am.
|
|
|
|
|
Still empty, hopefully people won't post "first" posts there 
|
|
|
|
|
Kids these days are just too serious, eh?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't gotten the insider since the 12th, and am short at least one forum reply over the same time period (several others have gotten  through).
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I really need to update the autocorrect feature on this system...
We've had email slowness over the past couple of days that have resulted in emails being delayed. In some cases such as the daily newsletters we had a situation where they didn't complete by the end of the day and so were cancelled and the new day's email started.
The issue was an interesting one: we do a big cache of data which takes a fair bit of time, and has a large timeout associated with it, but the volume grew to a point where it was just a few seconds past the timeout so kept getting into a try/retry spiral. We've (a) increased the timeout, (b) optimised the requests, and (c) are redoing the whole thing so it's chunked better in order to speed it up by a couple of orders of magnitude.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
My sympathies. Timeout to short - retry failure loops really suck. Nothing's worse than something that always just works, right up to the point that it fails for something totally unrelated to whatever you're doing.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - I love the "it always works until it doesn't" bug.
Our hosting guys are always asking "what did you change??".
Apart from several thousand lines of code, nothing, really.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure if this is the right place to post this but the last Insider newsletter I received was on November 15. I had been getting them daily for several years. I miss them, what's up?
There are only 10 types of people in this world; those that understand binary, and those that don't.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
