|
That's the turkeymonkey from a 1995 computer game featuring the band Devo, called "The Adventures of The Smart Patrol".
I scanned the image from Wired Magazine over 20 years ago.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. After all these years that mystery is solved.
I think I need to go sit down somewhere quiet.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
You should print this thread on paper, and store it in a secure, cool, and dry place for reference later when the topic comes up again. Because it WILL come up again.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting. 
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: You mean an old fart's icon? Or do you mean an icon that represents the wisdom, self-restraint and all round nurturing grandfatherly ways our elder members exhibit?
Yes. (Either way, that's me. Because you know how restrained and nurturing I am.  )
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Well, exactly.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q3/4/5: My guess would be "no" and "hell no"!
Until scoped CSS[^] gains widespread browser support, there's no way to restrict a block of CSS to only apply to a particular part of the page. If you apply a user's custom stylesheet to every page with one of that user's posts, we'll end up with an unreadable mess. Some users will do it by accident; others will do it deliberately.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Well you can do css "scoping" of a sort now with inline styles on the element. (Of course, I can do that myself now). But Christ said no and I'll take what I can get. But at least I have some style control. For now.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
- Yes
- Yes. It applies to the whole page.
- GOTO 1
- No
- No.
- No.
3-5: We've spent an awfully large amount of time ensuring the site works as we intend it to work, on the devices on which we intend it to work, and with the look that represents our branding. Allowing anyone, anywhere to change the CSS of the entire site would be wicked fun, but we may as well have no CSS at all and just open it up to the hordes. It would be crazy fun and very quickly unusable.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for considering... at least I got 50% yes answers. 
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
Why I'm forced to re register as a new member again ? I already done over a year ago (On Wednesday, December 24, 2014 9:28 AM).
I also forward the original email to webmaster account.
Waiting response
Song.
|
|
|
|
|
If your original account was deactivated, you would have received an email stating why it was deactivated. This is typically because someone violated the terms of the site, whether by posting spam or by being abusive or trolling.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
No emails so far. I was receiving daily and weekly news letters continuously till last week. I've not posted any offensive messages that I know. I don't even think I posted any messages.
The strange thing is that its not only me, my co-worker account is not working too. He is also waiting my response.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have a link to your old user id here?
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I got from the web master email.
http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11333117
|
|
|
|
|
So that account still looks to be active. Have you tried logging in with it?
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Are you sure? That doesn't look like an active account to me. Where's the link to the messages / questions / answers / etc? Where's the display name and user name? Where's the "report" flag? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Where's the beef?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Is this possible? Same email for multiple account. The reason I created this account is that I couldn't able to login to the old/deactivated account with the same email address to the current account. My suspicion is that someone or somewhere went wrong and deleted or removed my previous account. Same happens to my coworker too.
|
|
|
|
|
It shouldn't be possible, no. In fact when it happens, the system kind of loses its mind. Don't worry, I can fix it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sean Ewington wrote: Don't worry, I can fix it
Why does this remind me of this famous quote?Quote: My old man is a television repairman, he's got this
ultimate set of tools. I can fix it. - Jeff Spicoli
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
For example, this: Find the default gateway[^] which has two users listed:
Closed because this post is not a question, or has not been phrased in a way that allows a reasonable answer to be provided. Reported by F-ES Sitecore, ppolymorphe on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 1:55pm
The reason I ask is that it's actually spam, and needs five reports to close and feed to the spam detector. But since two members didn't spot that it can't be learned from. Surely, the number of reports to close something should be the same regardless of the reason?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK QA-questions take any kind of 3 reports to be closed and if there's less than 3 reporting members mentioned that's because the other(s) reported for a different reason than the stated one.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
![Jig | [Dance]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/jig.gif)
![Beer | [beer]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/beer.gif)
and a 