|
But I can see only one message...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
There were two - it's possible the OP deleted one of them.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Bug or not, but I'm affected as well.
|
|
|
|
|
This will be back in a couple of hours.
Sorry about that: some maintenance (read: refactoring with extreme prejudice) has been going on and bits and pieces have been disconnected and plugged up while we address the bleeding.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 8-Oct-16 22:37pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I think something is wrong with the "spam and abuse" mechanism that a link to, and explicit discussion of, sexual practices involving insertion of devices into orifices is left up on the Lounge, after I, and I assume others, have reported it. In fact, I wouldn't want to see it on the SoapBox, either, although the tolerance there for "smut" is, perhaps, a fact of life.
thanks, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
The spam and abuse filter has no morals: it merely categorises text based on a yes/no history of previous text.
I've moved the offending post.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Chris, I meant to refer to the process (whatever that is) of reviewing messages after they are reported, which, I assumed, is done by folks on the spam and abuse forum.
cheers, Bill
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - inappropriate for the lounge.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I've just edited a question at 21:39 BST / 20:39 GMT. My settings are set to GMT with DST. And yet the revision history[^] tells me that I edited it at 16:39.
Unless I've accidentally turned my computer into a TARDIS, something's going wrong somewhere. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I looks like you're doing a sh*tload of stuff in Quick Answers at the moment. Here's another thing to add to your list.
I just tried to "Improve Answer", and once submitted, it chopped of half of the original answer. No matter how I tried to improve it, it would not put it back. I ended up deleting and resubmitting from scratch.
Cheers,
Mick
------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter how often or hard you fall on your arse, eventually you'll roll over and land on your feet.
|
|
|
|
|
That's not good. If you can replicate it then let me know.
I have a suspicion, though. Did it contain HTML that wasn't HTML encoded?
Our new HTML Sanitiser has no mercy - none - and I need to tweak it to be a little less agro.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
There is still another typo in the same one. The questioner has already acknowledged the answer, so I'll pop in there now and see what happens. The entire response is in a <pre> block.
Cheers,
Mick
------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter how often or hard you fall on your arse, eventually you'll roll over and land on your feet.
|
|
|
|
|
OK, it DID do it again. But it had unencoded generics brackets (<string>) in it. Once I encoded them, it updated OK.
If you want something to test it all with, the answer is here[^] - just unencode the <string> and you should be able to reproduce.
Cheers,
Mick
------------------------------------------------
It doesn't matter how often or hard you fall on your arse, eventually you'll roll over and land on your feet.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
Added back.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
|
When i hit F12 and change tab to "Console" i see:
TypeError: n.getEditorObject is not a function in qa.min.js:1:6085
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Same here.
Not yet able to give answer to any question. 
___@sHubHa
|
|
|
|
|
When posting a message, the "Cancel" button does nothing. The console shows:
ReferenceError: CancelMsg is not defined
Browser check:
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0
Browser Firefox
Device Type Desktop
Version string 0.0
Version 0
Platform Win10
Platform Version 10.0
Chrome False
Edge False
IE False
Opera False
Safari False
Blink False
EdgeHTML False
Gecko True
Trident False
WebKit False
Desktop True
Tablet False
Mobile Device False
Small Mobile Device False
Touch Device False
Standard True
Display Mode Normal
Editable Elements False
Modern False
Semi-Modern False
CRC 286369546
Cookies OK? True
Looks like the browser detection script needs another kick. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
The appropriate bit has been found and large boot applied.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Clicking "Quote Selected Text" is doing the same thing as Post Message button in Replies. This happens in the Lounge and in Soapbox 1.0. Click Reply, highlight some text from the message, click Quote Selected Text and if nothing is in there yet you get the message that "You must supply some content..." and if there is content it just posts it after giving a prompt from browser to leave or stay.
Happening in Chrome on Win10.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
