|
That goes to Moderation queue (In some cases e.g. Filter smells it like a spam). It gets displayed when someone approves it. Whenever such case happens, go to homepage as you can approve your own messages also! 
I'm not sure MVP's have access to Message Moderation or not.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Rohan Leuva wrote: I'm not sure MVP's have access to Message Moderation or not.
No, I think that's restricted to "Protectors".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I can't see it. It's reserved for Protectors and up.
It would probably be helpful if there was a message that said your post is in the moderation queue or something to that effect.
That's the first time I've had anything hit the moderation queue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I hope it's not in progress! ... we'd be training spammers and trolls how to word their messages in order to get through. As things stand they are in blissful ignorance until they get blasted.
If a few of us have to wait a wee while to get genuine posts through then I think it's a small price to pay
|
|
|
|
|
Depends on how it's implemented (only show the message to users with rep of 10k or more, or something like that)
Also depends on what 'In progress' means, could just be that it's being discussed internally.
We will have to wait and see I guess
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Actually that rep thing is a really good idea! 
|
|
|
|
|
And I've just implemented it.
cheers
Chris Maunder
modified 19-Jun-15 15:23pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Me thinks it might need some more testing 
Server Error in '/' Application.
The resource cannot be found.
Description: HTTP 404. The resource you are looking for (or one of its dependencies) could have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable. Please review the following URL and make sure that it is spelled correctly.
Requested URL: /instances/500x/9689481.jpgit.
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Sigh[^]
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, figured it was that one hence the little jab at testing
But hey at least I now know that I'm not the only one (forced) to test code in production (yeah I know you where kidding, unfortunately I'm not )
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
I love that you think I'm kidding. 
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Don't destroy my believes, I'm surviving on the believe that the god's of the web haven't fallen pray of the deploy first, fix later disease  .
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
I have my moments, very few and far apart but sometimes ...
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
This is my account : http://www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=10339426[^]
details for closing :Composite Words using C#[^]
I think i done some mistakes i don't know what i done exactly.sir please reopen my account.
I have some confusion regarding posting an article in codeproject.i think that is the only reason my account closed now.i am active in code project in this year.please reopen soon.
Personally apologize for that.
Closed because this item is a copy of an existing article : the existing article is also wrote my self, but i forget to put the ref.
modified 17-Jun-15 8:52am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your account was closed because you have posted links to your own blogs as answers and articles. It amounts to site-driving spam.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hai chris,
i posted article in codeproject via technical blog.one author said that the format of technicl blog article not good,resubmit again,i tried to resubmit that but another one said that it is a tip and trick,i just changed that in to tip and trick,then one author said that its not a tip tricks it's a techblog..each authors are different thought.finally closed my account.i don't understand who's decision is correct.please reopen my account..first time i am submiting artcle to codeproject,before submission i mention that my article is not good for codproject criteria authors can delete my article with reason.becoz thats reason will helping for my next post..if u not believe my thought you can check my articles comments..
I am very active in codeproject in this year most of them accept my solution in codeproject.i am very happy to debug the code if u please reopen my orginal account.
|
|
|
|
|
Your article was closed and your account was voted out by the CP community because you attempted to post a plagiarised article. You are not the author of this[^] post, which is where your solution originated. Plagiarism is not allowed.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you check the output pattern of both article,in my article content it's reading from text file line by line.then it's concatinate with input data..after concatinating it's providing the output..i refferd both site but both output and input are different.
|
|
|
|
|
I reffered both article but i am not copy the same article in here,you can check it..in my article content text file data read by line by line then concatinate those data into the given input,then only it's provided the permutation and combination and count..that article will provide the input content combination and count..reffernce are mostly help to build some new concept.
|
|
|
|
|
You used the same variable names and the same method names. The algorithm is a direct copy. Seriously, do you think we are stupid? Do you have that low an impression of our intelligence that you think we would be fooled? The only real difference is that yours is reading from the file - but this is trivial. The heart of the algorithm is a letter by letter copy and that's plagiarism and that's why your account was closed. Plagiarism is a serious offence in lots of countries, and CP is rightly proud of the zero tolerance approach to plagiarism.
|
|
|
|
|
K sir, i apologize for that.there have any way to reopen my CP.
I have some doubts,It's my first mistake in cp.before submiting article i mention to authors suggestions when my article not follow cp criteria then authors can delete my article directly with reason.no one warning me and they directly delete my account.that's y i ask you to reopen my cp account.i am one of the active member in cp in around 2 year but i didnt do any mistakes in cp.this is the first time i am posting some article through tech blog..warning is the important manner to inform a new author mistake.the author done the mistake again and again you can delete the account directly.
|
|
|
|
|
Member 11772743 wrote: i am one of the active member in cp in around 2 year
Then you should know about the rules
Member 11772743 wrote: but i didnt do any mistakes in cp.
This (asking and explaning) and honest regret might get your account reopened if the admins of the site (the only ones who can do that) think you deserve it. I recommend you to be patient, people asking to reopen the account are usually taken into consideration. You will get an answer from them with the decission.
Member 11772743 wrote: warning is the important manner to inform a new author mistake.the author done the mistake again and again you can delete the account directly.
I know it might sound unfair, but being honest:
The number of legitimate errors and people who learn from it is soooooo small if you compare with people blatantly copying+pasting others work to get "reputation" or spamming or abusing... that it is more effective to close and then reopen some of them (see my 2nd comment), than making the close process slower.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
