|
Be happy that it is ok now, I am happy so far 
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I've asked a question at QA[^], and got an answer...but got 20! notifications about it...(I left 18 there to see)...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guessing the original poster had his post marked as spam and then kept trying to repost.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 14-Oct-15 9:54am.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 14-Oct-15 10:04am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a blog which uses Jekyll and Octopress to generate a static site. For code highlighting I use OctoPress's triple-tick
syntax. Apparently it generates an ugly HTML which makes it unreadable when imported to CP.
When a blog article is consumed, would it be affected by any changes I make to the original source?
My plan is to publish the post with pre tags around the code snippets then once it's consumed and looks nice on CP I can update my original post with the triple-ticks.
Of course I'd appreciate if you recommend an easier/better way.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please send me a link to your blog's RSS or a sample of the HTML it generates? Email chris at codeproject.com and I'll see if I can make things easier.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Chris. I sent an email with the information you requested. Octopress is generating somewhat weird HTML with lots of spans.
In the meantime if I update my blog after it has been consumed it wouldn't effect the version on the CodeProject, right?
I'm not sure if they are updated or it consumes only the new posts.
|
|
|
|
|
Apologies for not getting a chance to reply to your email. The html is definitely odd. I was actually curious as to why octopress is doing what it's doing because when I view it he code isn't actually colourised- it's monochrome.
The easiest thing for me to do is sniff whether or not the colouriser is seeing an octopress mess and if so clean the pre block before colorising.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
While updating my profile picture, my pictures contain some special characters and your system refuse to update it and show me the error page of evil hamsters with warning of illegal characters passed in your profile picture path.
THis error stick while updating the other settings as well with profile picture remove, error seems to come in every page i visit and try to update my profile info atleast i try to refresh it with cache clear by pressing ctrl + f5 key combination and it work well.
kindly look into this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Took me a second to figure it out too, but we simply plotted a little ahead. Don't let that spoil the magic, though.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
crudeCodeYogi wrote: I can see news for 16-Oct
go fast to the lottery or sport winners and tell me 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
When I'm reporting spammers in the spam forum, please don't mark my post as spam. Honestly, the number of messages I have had lately that are getting flagged as spam - the spam detection system is doing a very poor job.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry mate.
Can you point me to a message of yours being marked?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry for chuckling ... but I just passed this through the spam moderation check 
|
|
|
|
|
I'm truly not sure what to do in this situation.
Your message was basically: 4 high probability keywords (some repeated) in the title + 4 URLs.
The spam filter took one look and went off its nut.
Options are:
- Remove those keywords from the filter. Not really an option, really.
- Not run the spam filter when it's you posting. This is the easiest, but we have had high(er) rep members post spam. Maybe we start with a "Anyone over 10K rep" or something gets excused.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
If I post spam, I promise to report the message as spam.
|
|
|
|
|
Only if you promise.
(FWIW I've made the spam filter more tolerant of Gentleman Of High Esteem And Honesty such as yourself)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
To be honest, I've had messages pended for less "spammy" content when reporting other spam, but I'd rather have a message of mine pended than some so-and-so's real stuff sneaking through. At the end of the day, it's only a short delay (hmm...didn't mean that to rhyme)
We had a real hit at the weekend again ... In those circumstances I'm happy to wait (and go into moderation and clear my own message  )
I've (others have too) stopped putting the the gist of the spam in the report to avoid the situation ... if it's ended up in moderation and someone goes to the effort of reporting it as well then ... it's spam! No need to repeat the stuff they've (the spammer) has posted.
Maybe some guidance in the sticky post?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHill60 wrote: No need to repeat the stuff they've (the spammer) has posted
Last time were some complaints about "blind trusting" our reports.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
