|
That's probable as I found that posting the complete line produced the same effect (of superflous quotes). So I edited my post just to show the part where the error occurred.
Cheers!
"With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine."
Ross Callon, The Twelve Networking Truths, RFC1925
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I don't know is this bug at this new GUI or something is wrong with my web browser.
When I position mouse pointer over drop down menus title, for exmple discussions,
drop down menu opens, but when I move pointer down to select next option it closes.
I struggled until I started this discussion group to report this.
This happens randomly but it is very annoying,
and refers to all titles except the home title which do not have drop down menu.
My browser is IE ver 8, OS MS Windows XP Home SP3.
All the best,
Perić Željko
|
|
|
|
|
I have same issue and I also have same config. IE8 on XP.
If you can move the mouse really, really, really, really, fast, then the list will stay open. 
[EDIT]
If you click and hold the menu text, eg. 'discussions', while the list appears, then move your mouse down to the list, the list doesn't disappear and you can now select from the list okay.
However with some further playing, I can make the word completely disappear and be replaced by a block of orange. Tres weird.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Chris,
I confirm that the speed have something to do with it.
All the best,
Perić Željko
|
|
|
|
|
I confirm that too.
Thanks for ansver.
All the best,
Perić Željko
|
|
|
|
|
Perić Željko wrote: IE ver 8
I already see the root cause of your issue.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Reputationator - CP Narcissists Rejoice! Part 2 of 4[^]
It's broken for all four parts (they all link to the same file, so that's probably why they're all broken), but this is the one where it was reported.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for letting us know. I believe we have fixed it across all four articles
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
Slightly off-topic, did you ever get around to using the article API I whipped up for you? Just wondering if it's needed, if it's used, and if it would cause you pain if I changed it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
your new web's layout is very beautiful. I have a trouble in article "Charting-in-NET-4".The archive file is browsable but where is the dowload command for it?
Thank you
Roberto Guerzoni
|
|
|
|
|
If you mean this one: Charting in .NET 4[^] please try to give a link in future - it helps people to find the exact article you mean (and there are a lot of them!)
If that is it, then I see no download either, but then I don't really see an article there either - that is at best a Tip.
While it is possible that the recent changes have lost a lot of content (including the download) I can't see any reason why that was let through in the first place!
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, the link is just that. This is not an article as I incorrectly reported but of a tips.
In the future I'll try to add the link to the page.
Thanks for your help.
Roberto Guerzoni
|
|
|
|
|
http://i.imgur.com/v3hFo.png[^]
Hapenning to me in chrome under weven when I re-size. The screenshot is @125%, other zoom levels have differing levels of correctness.
FF seems fine, IE seems to have very minor problems at high zoom in & out.
modified 20-Sep-12 9:23am.
|
|
|
|
|
I see it as well in Firefox. The offset seems random and does not depend on the zoom level. It seems to happen while zooming in or out, then it resets. I am guessing it has something to do with how fast the rendering engine works.
I think computer viruses should count as life. I think it says something about human nature that the only form of life we have created so far is purely destructive. We've created life in our own image.
Stephen Hawking
|
|
|
|
|
Dear CP,
At the bottom of every article there is a link Article Top tat should bring you at the top of the page. Since the new version got in, it is not working (tried on Chrome, latest version).
Cheers
“The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser men so full of doubts.”
|
|
|
|
|
Is the Metro UI against separators in menus?
|
|
|
|
|
... ask a few of us oldies to beta test the new UI ? (Or maybe I just reckoned I am not member of the club).
I am feeling microsofted.
Feedback (if any required): Overall very good, for the rest, same as everyone (separate threads more clearly (with a light orange shade?), grey on white is not senior-friendly, too much space kills the space, too much white kills the white.)
Thanks for keeping Bob and bit of orange
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
Because the oldies are stuck in their old ways?
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, but there is always some good advice to be taken from them.
~RaGE();
I think words like 'destiny' are a way of trying to find order where none exists. - Christian Graus
Do not feed the troll ! - Common proverb
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, I'm (reasonably) happy with the new layout, and using it as I type. It's even better when I set text size to 90% in Chrome. Pah, you kids know nothing. 
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like some oldies didn't like that comment. 
And no, I don't think it was you, you would have told me so.
I have to admit that I'm not generally negative to the new layout, even if it might seem so from my posts.
I'm only negative to specifics. And it seems to me that most people have similar opinions about which shortcomings there are.
And they will be ironed out soon enough I believe.
I'm also using 90% size by the way.
|
|
|
|
|
Jörgen Andersson wrote: I don't think it was you
Of course not, your comment was perfectly reasonable. I did try and counter it, but it looks like some heavy hitter (older and more miserable than me) got upset.
One of these days I'm going to think of a really clever signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Must be more than 1. My 5 didn't counteract much either.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps he did. With Chris, you never can tell - cards close to the chest, he plays.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
