|
hey.. everyone see how he nonsense. this is how civilized person talk.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
same goes to you. let me try again.
"Could u go other places to sh*t?"
Better??
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
Considering that is what your article amounts to, you were the one who started shitting on CodeProject first, "LOW LIFE".
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
take a mirror and look at yourself. the mirror might crack~!!
1. WREY
Status Gold. Member No. 4650
View Member's Blog.
Messages Posted
(while logged in) 880
Articles Submitted
0
Biography None provided
Location United States
Occupation Software development, Software Components, Research
Interests C++, MFC, ATL, COM, Database
Member since Thursday 6th July, 2000
(4 years, 3 months)
Homepage
Hahaha LOL!
you are contributing more and more!!! got improvement from 871 to 880 msg now. shame u! 880 message posted. and still 0 article submitted.
u judge yourself, who is shitting around. CONGRAT!!
if you realise from now on, you may have "some" hope... pls take ur hope and go away~
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
under, "INTERESTING", and it got you nowhere.
As the other poster suggested, let's go with this offline, "LOW LIFE", and I'll deal with you there.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
do i need you to remind me that? this is your improvement that u've made, that's why i want someone to look at it. because i am PROUD of u. you are extraordinary, man.. *melting*
yo, how come you delete away your own post in this article? where's your BALLs? where's your mojo? come on, tell us why u wanna do so? must be very shame right? dun worry, again, i am proud of you..
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
Since everything MUST be explained to you, I keep forgetting how easy it is for your "LOW LIFE" mind to misinterpret and twist things around.
I started deleting my post to show I was SERIOUS about continuing this lesson offline with you, but then stopped when I realized either you wouldn't have the BALLS to do it, or you might interpret it as me backing off.
Just as I suspected, your twisted "LOW LIFE" mind has misinterpreted it as shame being the reason. If that was true, then I would have continued deleting ALL of them. No "LOW LIFE", I stopped because I just had a feeling you would come up with the same excuse you just did.
So the rest of the post will stay up just to correct your twisted "LOW LIFE" way of thinking, and as for shame, that is something you don't have!!
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
hey ball less guy.. so call civilized people. i dun have such free time like u do, so the lesson u wanna practice is to try it in front of the mirror.
U made me repeat many many times already, dun u bored? as i said, pls use your time diligently, go and write at least one or more article rather shitting around. dun pollute here and there. u are basically worse than chemical waste. please listen to me k? dun try to be bad.
Hopefully you will become more useful person one day. nah!
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
... a senseless misfit of evolution that is seeking ways of enhancing its survival chances. Wait your turn for evolution to catch up with your miserable "LOW LIFE" existence. In the meantime, GO BACK TO YOUR CAVE and cleanse mankind of your pitiful "LOW LIFE" contamination.
One only has to look at what you have written to determine what's worthwhile of it. It's better if you weren't throwing trash around than to claim you have done something meaningful.
It's BETTER to write NO TRASH, than to write one and believe you have done something meaningful and worthwhile (but you wouldn't know that, "LOW LIFE").
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
u are nothing worth compare to a trash. u are still the same, mojo.. u contribute nothing but less than nothing. plus a bonus, u pollute here and there. u actually have some hope, but u didn't appreciate it. now i think, you can't be saved. may god forgive u one day.
so long..
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
You copy!
That's one way you seek to improve your survival chances. You copy! But it's not working!
The other way (you believe) is by mixing with higher forms of existence, ... people!
I used to think it's evolution that has not caught up with you. Now I more believed it's evolution which REJECTED you; left you behind. YOU ARE A REJECT OF EVOLUTION!! There's NOTHING redeemable about you.
You need to go back to your cave and stop contaminating the outside world, you PUTRID MASS OF PROTOPLASMIC PUS.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
I dont want to be rude here mate.
If the article doesn't suit your needs then perhaps you might like either fix it yourself or not use it at all.
William mojo, stop shitting here and just go away~ i wonder how your stomach able to contain so much sh*t! u are not listening and continuing shitting. u basically no hope at all. i wonder how you can survive..
what articles have *you* posted, you f***ing loser? (nothing)
What *precisely* have you contributed to the site? (justshit)
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
No, "LOW LIFE" it's YOU who is not listening, because you won't go back to your cave, and stay there. Stop trying to mix with species of a higher order. Can't you understand, "Evolution has REJECTED YOU!!!"
You are an EVOLUTIONARY REJECT!!!
In a way I can understand why you're fighting like hell not to go back to your cave. You so DESPARARTELY want to survive.
I will keep fighting like hell to send you back.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
do you ever see dead man walking. u won't see it, because u are the one.
your whole body is dead, ur brain is corrupted and malfunction, only left your mouth still shitting... u are evil.
what articles have *you* posted, you f***ing loser? (nothing)
What *precisely* have you contributed to the site? (justshit)
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
... and fighting like hell to send you back to your "LOW LIFE" cave.
Ask yourself the same question, "LOW LIFE", "What have YOU contributed?" Nothing but a piece of TRASH that you threw some words together, calling it an article but which only shows your ignorance, because as the other poster stated, "Profiling is Pointless!!!" You didn't get it then, and you still don't get it now. So it is YOU who is the f***ing loser, "LOW LIFE", and the one who is contributing sh*t to the site.
If you say it's sh*t I'm contributing, it's to the piece of TRASH you have posted.
What's worst, is that you are adding more SH*T to the same piece of SH*T you call an article.
You are so f***ing IGNORANT, that you believe only someone who has written a book ought to be able to say something about another book.
I am NOT surprised that you are so f***ing IGNORANT, "LOW LIFE", it's why evolution REJECTED you!!!
I am happy to be contributing sh*t to this piece of SH*T you call an article, and I'm even more thrilled to see you are doing the SAME!!!
Go back to your cave "LOW LIFE" and stop contaminating the world outside. You are a REJECT of EVOLUTION.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
supprise! WREY is trying to wakeup from dead..
i know you have gone through the EVOLUTION process. so now times up already, u are dead.
so now your whole body is dead, but unluckily ur mouth somehow can still shitting. it is still an unknown subject over here. all kinds of bacteria and viruses will slowly eating up your body, any finally your mouth will be gone as well. i understand is quite a pain and you are struggling to survive. keep it up WREY!!! you should able to make it through! if you have faith in it, you should try with no end to wakeup from dead.. this is another generation of Mutated Resident Evil.
what articles have *you* posted, you f***ing loser? (nothing)
What *precisely* have you contributed to the site? (justshit)
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
You are simply recycling your own sh*t, "LOW LIFE". Copying from me what I've described you to be. That's all you're doing. Copying from me the things I've described you to be. "PROOF" again that you didn't evolve fully. EVOLUTION HAS REJECTED YOU, "LOW LIFE", but you feel that by copying things that I've described you to be, you can FAKE that you're not an EVOLUTIONARY REJECT. No matter how much you try to copy my description of you as an EVOLUTIONARY REJECT, it's NOT going to save you. You are already MARKED!!!
Your article is a piece of TRASH, "LOW LIFE". How many times do I have to say it for you to understand that it's BETTER to write NOTHING, than to write TRASH. Do you understand that, "LOW LIFE"?
It's BETTER TO WRITE NOTHING, THAN TO WRITE TRASH!!!
Somehow you feel that by submitting a piece of TRASH, you can prove that EVOLUTION did not REJECT you. TRASH is TRASH, no matter which way you look at it.
I just love the fact that you know I'm shitting on your article, and even better that you are helping in the process. Keep shitting "LOW LIFE",it's obvious you are used to being shitted upon.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
WREY wrote:
You are simply recycling your own sh*t, "LOW LIFE". "PROOF" again that you didn't evolve fully.
exactly what you are doing. well done.
WREY wrote:
It's BETTER TO WRITE NOTHING, THAN TO WRITE TRASH!!!
exactly what you are doing. i love this statement. this is more than well done. (i give u 5 on this!)
what articles have *you* posted, you f***ing loser? (nothing)
what *precisely* have you contributed to the site? (justshit)
from,
-= aLbert =-
ps: do you have anything new? otherwise i am bored already... if u keeping repeating at ur joke, ur joke is not new, i can't laugh anymore. hardly visit your joke next time.
|
|
|
|
|
Granted, for some people, this article might have little or no meaning, while for others, it would be the opposite.
But that's besides the point, because for everyone who reads it, IT SHOULD HAVE MEANING, which is what it lacks.
Look at the article, it premises to show the difference in performance by calculating 'pi' using one thread, and then in another instance by using two threads. Other than saying someone would obtain better result running the sample application on a dual processor machine, there is very little information the author reveals about how he proposes proving his point!! His article did not even say he would be using the calculation of 'pi' as the focus of his experiment. You are learning about this from my message.
The statistics he shows at the end of the article, I'm sure has a lot of meaning to him and his work. But if the reader doesn't understand how they are obtained, and what they represent (singularly, or generally), what's the point?
I had to look through his code to derive understanding of what was happening, because running the sample simply showed the calculation of 'pi' (if you could immediately recognize it), followed by a number after each calculation (for which you'd have to look through the code to learn what they represent). The article explains very precious little, which is why I say it is a very poorly written article.
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
The statistics he shows at the end of the article, I'm sure has a lot of meaning to him and his work. But if the reader doesn't understand how they are obtained, and what they represent (singularly, or generally), what's the point?
Come on...
The article will only show some light in the tunnel, it won't get you far. By the time I don’t know how to spend my time, then I will spoon feed you one by one. well, have you learn how to do profiling already? i am shame for you. hope you are learning.. (oh gosh, why should i bother such people whether is learning or not? i should let them rotted.)
I only respect doer. Never respect talker.
and I dun talk nonsense.
anyway, thanks for your effort.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
Don't be ashamed for me for not even remembering about profiling. I gave up profiling over 6 years ago when I got my first dual processor machine and saw its benchmarkings. Since then I've never bothered to profile anything simply because the applications I have been running, have ALWAYS done better (as expected) and there was no need to do further profiling. However, for your article, I had to recall somethings about it and soon remembered how to obtain it (long before you even replied).
Don't be ashamed for me!! If you want to be ashamed for anyone, BE ASHAMED FOR YOURSELF!! who wrote a wishy-washy article by throwing some words together without much of anything that explained what it's about. Then when someone points out its lack of meaning, you get all riled up when the truth is exposed.
Face the facts and look at it for what it is, and in the process try and learn something about how to improve your writing skills. You could certainly use some spoon-feeding of your own in that department!!
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
are u rotted already? oh really, ur knowledge was rotted. your comment was totally out of topic. your comment was no value added to this article. thanks for your English literature lesson. here is technical. by the way, are u going to wrong site? writing competition? please wake up.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
What are you talking about, "rotted"? What does "rotted" have to do with the few words you threw together you call an article? Where is your mind at? Are you sure you're on planet Earth?
Get a hold of yourself if you want to sound intelligible!! You make no sense!!
William
Fortes in fide et opere!
|
|
|
|
|
oh by the way, what's the result u are getting it run on your machine? i remember u have dual-processor machine right?
come on.. no heart feeling right?
please contribute something to share with others.. today i went to my office but forget to do the profiling to complete the article.
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|
1. WREY
Status Gold. Member No. 4650
View Member's Blog.
Messages Posted
(while logged in) 871
Articles Submitted
0
Biography None provided
Location United States
Occupation Software development, Software Components, Research
Interests C++, MFC, ATL, COM, Database
Member since Thursday 6th July, 2000
(4 years, 3 months)
Homepage
Hahaha LOL!
take a look at this! you are really a good talker!!! shame u! 871 message posted. 0 article submitted. such contribution u've given, well done man... "i.. feeling.. so.. touch.." CP really lack of this type of people...
listen, CP may want you. but please don't appear in my article. u are not welcome.
i only appreciate technical comment. not english lesson. if you dun like here, please go somewhere else. dun sh*t around. well, 871 is quite a lots of sh*t u have made. again, CONGRAT!!
from,
-= aLbert =-
|
|
|
|
|