|
Did he sort it by hand or fed the code to some elegant sorting algorithm he invented
|
|
|
|
|
Are you kidding?  He probably didn't know the meaning of the word invented and certainly didn't know what an algorithm was.
|
|
|
|
|
'-?Ibbdddeeeehiillnooooopssttuuuvwwy
oops, sorry, I mean:
I don't beleive you - who would be so stupid?
|
|
|
|
|
Impressive. I'm not sure if he'll make a good computer programmer but he sure as hell would make a good computer.
Steve
|
|
|
|
|
He may be the best bugger of the world 
Don't forget to Click on [Vote] and [Good Answer] on the posts that helped you.
Regards - Kunal Chowdhury | Software Developer | Chennai | India | My Blog | My Tweets | Silverlight Tutorial
|
|
|
|
|
<br />
";".ToCharArray()<br />
'nuf said.
|
|
|
|
|
Did I mention that this was an argument to string.Split() which is defined to take (params char[])?
They could have simply typed:
';'
|
|
|
|
|
It would have been a gem if the code was something like this:
"argument1;argument2;argument3".Split(";".ToString());
I have no smart signature yet...
|
|
|
|
|
Derek Viljoen wrote: Did I mention that this was an argument to string.Split() which is defined to take (params char[])?
That was only introduced in .NET 3.5 IIRC.
I have written similar code ages back too.
|
|
|
|
|
Same here - and until today I still would have had I not seen your post and tried using a single char parameter.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: No, see here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b873y76a%28VS.80%29.aspx[^]
Well, I can't say, the f***in page is stuck on C++ 
PS: IIRC C++ does not support .NET params.
Update:
IE to the rescue. I see it was there (in 2.0), maybe I am thinking of something else...
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what else you could be thinking of - you were talking about the params overload for .NET 2.0 right?
|
|
|
|
|
This is what I have seen years ago.
a.ToString().ToString();
Yeah... he was just tired... couldn't prevent a prank by Intellisence.
|
|
|
|
|
The one I loathe is
string s = "Hello";
string x = s.ToString();
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
or even ".".ToString(); 
Two heads are better than one.
|
|
|
|
|
What happened to your post titled "BitVector32 vs BitArray ???" in this forums? Did you delete it?
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry.
I deleted it because it could be a mere slander.
|
|
|
|
|
Who cares, we don't know the author anyway
|
|
|
|
|
problem:
why "i don't rember exactly the hard coded string".ToString.ToUpper(); ?
answer: I just hate writting using caps.
Concluzion: I'm sure he/she had his reasons.
I bug
|
|
|
|
|
Private Sub textBox1_KeyPress(ByVal eventSender As System.Object, ByVal eventArgs As System.Windows.Forms.KeyPressEventArgs) Handles textBox1.KeyPress
Dim KeyAscii As Short = Asc(eventArgs.KeyChar)
Dim Index As Short = textBox1.GetIndex(eventSender)
If InStr("ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" & Chr(8), Chr(KeyAscii)) > 0 Or KeyAscii < 32 Then
Else
KeyAscii = 0
Beep()
End If
eventArgs.KeyChar = Chr(KeyAscii)
If KeyAscii = 0 Then
eventArgs.Handled = True
End If
End Sub
Getting sick of these kind of codeblocks ...
oh yeah, remember Char(8) is a backspace 
If anyone knows why he might have written this line :
Dim Index As Short = textBox1.GetIndex(eventSender)
I have no clue ...
|
|
|
|
|
ddecoy wrote: I have no clue ...
Welcome to my world... 
-NP
Never underestimate the creativity of the end-user.
|
|
|
|
|
The best line in this function is Beep()!
|
|
|
|
|
We aren't in the Lounge now - no need to censor your language...
Did you know:
That by counting the rings on a tree trunk, you can tell how many other trees it has slept with.
|
|
|
|
|
The code isn't testing for alphanumeric--just alphabetic. That having been said, I don't see anything overly hideous. I would expect VB to recognize the string with the letters and backspace as a constant, so the code simply searches for an input character in a constant string. Not gorgeous (using a named constant called AllowableKeys or something would help), but the list of allowable characters can be easily adjusted by changing the string. If upper and lower case are going to be handled identically elsewhere, it might have been nice to convert to uppercase and just check against uppercase letters.
As for my own style, if I were just checking against one contiguous range of characters, I'd use the >= and <= to check the range. With two ranges, or one range plus one or two other characters, I'd still probably use those. With more than that, I'd likely just search in a string with all valid characters.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
