Hello! I recently made some valuable (to my opinion) updates to my article, but it did not go to the top of the list. At the same time I remember that some of my articles were moved to the top after even minor updates. So what is the criterion for the article to be moved to the top after being updated? Also as far as I understand, few points should have been awarded for editing the article, which also did not happen. Is it a issue with the site?
There is a check box at the bottom of the article editor: Mark this article as updated?
If that is not checked the update time stamp of the article is not set and the updated article will not be shown in the list of updated / new articles.
Thank you for the suggestion, but I cannot really find this checkbox. I only see two checkboxes in my editor: I have read and agree to the contributor's agreement and Work in progress: don't publish. I used text search on the page to make sure I did not miss it.
I asked about the points because this is not the first time it happened, and last time there was a problem with the site, so this may be somehow related this time.
Expert mode checkbox is most likely missing because my site reputation is lower than yours. Not sure if this is also the case for the Update checkbox.
I will try the bugs forum. Thank you for you suggestions!
Please help me out to find a method of changing the width of particular columns and cells colors when editing tables with articles editor. I've tried both using the editor and html-formatting, *BUT* useless. When using the editor, the column width changing pivots are not responsive. When I've used html-formatting, specifying such attributes as style="width: 500px;" or width="500px" of <th>,<tr>,<td> - tags are omitted.
This is a new unfinished revision of the currently published article, *BUT* anyway you can review it.
At the present time, I'm working on a large update of this article, that would introduce a slightly different point of view on the process of data sorting itself by implementing a different sorting algorithm. That's what this article's contents are all about.
For the justification and to prove the content is authentic. I have updated the article and also added source code and video link which explains about the implementation of the real-time data acquisition, consumption and processing.
here is the youtube video link:
I have put in hard efforts to present the authentic work on the reputed platform like codeproject. Despite my three updates to the same article attempt is not fruitful for me yet.
I wanted to publish first article on codeprojects platform, so I have put in enough efforts, my work is novel contents including images, results are original and I have given enough content to prove the same. I declare this is my last attempt with codeproject if you approve it and publish it. I will be happiest in the world. Please consider original content and appropriate content. else I will be withdrawing the content from the platform.
Dear sir, I am a new member to codeproject.I have written an article on live data acquisition and consumption.I wanted to write basics about the live bio signal processing. I had written to Sean sir who told me to check English, content, and add analytics and decision along with full code. I am not good in English. I took help from friend to change as much as possible, I have been started basics of data science since 15 days, I found the app mentioned in the article in google play store and have explored features it offers.
I have not plagiarised any images used in the article, and have written the article based on my recent learnings please do have a look at the code here is the iPython Notebook link:
My humble request to you is run the code and check. and if you still suggest any changes, I will accept your suggestions and will make changes as per your suggestions. Please Help me out to publish article on codeproject. It's always been dream of mine to be part of reputed programming community. Eagerly waiting for your valuable suggestions And I am on toes to see my article published on codeproject.
would you please guide the criteira of considering the blog as article or tips/trick. I have uploaded an article but now its created with tips/trick. Althoug the article was explaining the topic in easy and understandable way alongwith picture. Even I could not find the exact result on any other side aswell thats why I decided to write the article. but the codeproject has considered as tis/tricks.
I think you're on the right track trying to make something understandable, but there are indeed topics like this on CodeProject and other sites.
Tips and tricks are supposed to be succinct solutions to a very specific problem. Articles are meant to be exhaustive explorations of a topic. Sometimes members or editors find a post that isn't an article and it isn't a tip; it's somewhere inbetween and it may get filed incorrectly.
Truthfully, I'm not sure that post was right for CodeProject and I've removed it. For your next article I recommend keeping in mind the idea of describing something you haven't seen described somewhere else, but staying away from areas like fundamentals. Try to find a really unique topic to your experience and describe it in great detail. I recommend looking very closely as this article for guidance: A Guide To Writing Articles For Code Project[^]
I saw a brief flash of a message saying my article was deleted. Now the article is gone and the message is gone. I have no idea how to get it back so all of my work is also gone. I didn't get the opportunity to copy and paste it to something/somewhere else.
I went to the trouble to update a solution that is a few years old (Using native LogonUser code in advapi32.dll gives unsatisfiedLink error[^]) as a way of giving back because the existing solution was helpful but unusable in its existing form as it was very much out of date. Then I get an email saying that my solution "has been reported by Dave Kreskowiak, Graeme_Grant, Kats2512 and has been closed, with the reason being given as Content has been posted that is spam." There was nothing about the solution that was spam, it was one sentence and a code block. I'm perplexed and a little miffed.