|
Read the file in and replace the | character with an empty string if you don't know what else to do with it.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please tell me what you are trying to do? then I can help you. Every times you need call for help you should give detail information about your problem so that someone could help you immediately.
Regards,
Sokhanh
modified 26-Mar-17 10:40am.
|
|
|
|
|
reference: FastColoredTextBox
output is "example"
event:
private void codeBox_TextChanged(object sender, FastColoredTextBoxNS.TextChangedEventArgs e)
functions:
my_Parser.FunctionParse(singleLine);
var fileLines = System.IO.File.ReadAllLines(IncludesFolder + "\\" + output + ".inc");
foreach (var singleLine in fileLines)
{
string lastOutput = "";
foreach (char m_str in my_Parser.FunctionParse(singleLine))
{
if (m_str.ToString() == "(")
{
break;
}
else
{
lastOutput += m_str.ToString();
}
}
e.ChangedRange.ClearStyle(PinkStyle);
e.ChangedRange.SetStyle(PinkStyle, @"" + lastOutput);
}
|
|
|
|
|
And?
What does it do that you didn't expect, or not do that you did?
This is not a good question - we cannot work out from that little what you are trying to do.
Remember that we can't see your screen, access your HDD, or read your mind.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm doing some research for a project I'm going to start.
What's involved in running a MEF Plugin in a separate thread? How hard it is? Any pitfalls/issues I need to know about?
The basic idea is to have a Windows Service load & run MEF plugins in their own threads.
Thanks
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.
Everything makes sense in someone's mind.
Ya can't fix stupid.
modified 17-Mar-17 11:06am.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry I'm late to the party. I've played with MEF(1) quite a bit, and a tiny bit with MEF2.
So there are a couple gotchas with parallel MEF. The first is re-composition: do you want to be able to rebuild the application assets on the fly? That requires some careful coordination and disposal in long-running processes and a bit of gamesmanship with AppDomains.
The other biggie is making sure to use shared and non-shared components appropriately. If you're careful with it, you get well behaved standard and singleton instances that work together well. If you munge it, you get surprise bugs that you won't find until you hit regression testing; best case scenario.
The other "gotcha" is for all MEF-based projects is when multiple versions come into play. That will break your application every time unless you've put a mechanism in place to handle versioning. I'm playing with the idea of each module providing a Loader class which exposes a local AssemblyCatalog and a mechanism to resolve versioning disputes, but still not quite in love with that idea.
I hope you've dug in by now, MEF is a blast to work with!
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
I pass value jquery Ajax call object value. It passed on script side . but controller side i get counts only and that field values are only null. Filters: dataFilter This value only not got. other values are passed. other value only single,but this value is object.
So how can sent/get? jquery to mvc controller side
read: {
url: "/xxxxx/xxxx/xxxxx",
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8",
dataType: "json",
//async: false,
type: "GET"
},
parameterMap: function (options, operation) { if (operation == "read" && options) {
var filtercust = DataSource.filter();
if (typeof (filter) != "undefined" && filter != null) {
<pre>
<big>ViewModel.pushKendoCustomFilter(filterAndCondition);</big>
var dataFilter = ViewModel.Filters;
return { showInActive: sad, skip: options.skip, take: options.take, pageSize: options.pageSize, filter: filter, <b><u></u>Filters: dataFilter</b> };
}
return { showInActive: sad, skip: options.skip, take: options.take, pageSize: options.pageSize, filter: filter };
}
pushKendoCustomFilter: function (filterAndCondition) {
ViewModel.Filters = [];
for (var i = 0; i < filterAndCondition.filters.length; i++) {
ViewModel.Filters.push({ Field: filterAndCondition.filters[i].field, Value: filterAndCondition.filters[i].value });
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
Bad formatting made me go cross-eyed.
Anyhow, I think this is a question to ask over at Telerik, as it's pretty meaningless outside of their (paid) framework. You should have a support contract with them if you're using Kendo.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
- Benjamin Disraeli
|
|
|
|
|
With C#6, there is the beautiful feature of string interpolation. I tried to use it as follows:
public class MyClass
{
private string baseMessage = $"{DateTime.Now:yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff} [{NAME}] {Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId} .";
public void DoSomethingSpecial(string param1, ...)
{
string message = baseMessage + $"{nameof(DoSomethingSpecial)}({nameof(param1)}={param1}, ...)");
Console.WriteLine(message);
}
} Nice idea, eh?
Well, I was wrong: the parameters of baseMessage are evaluated when MyClass is instantiated, and then don't change anymore, never reflecting current time and thread. I then decided to write a function for creating the message (which defines baseMessage locally), and solved the problem that way.
But I am curious: is there a way to get the content more "dynamic" with string interpolation, thus allowing for baseMessage to be defined at instance level?
|
|
|
|
|
Makeit readonly and set it in the constructor?
Or if you need it to change, create baseMessage as a property instead of a field.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
How about using a property? With C# 6's expression-bodied members, you only need a single extra character:
public class MyClass
{
private string baseMessage => $"{DateTime.Now:yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.fff} [{NAME}] {Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId} .";
public void DoSomethingSpecial(string param1, ...)
{
string message = baseMessage + $"{nameof(DoSomethingSpecial)}({nameof(param1)}={param1}, ...)";
Console.WriteLine(message);
}
}
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that works. Nice idea!
|
|
|
|
|
select source and destination and show all toll plazza list..and show in google map..using asp.net c#..
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a good question, we cannot work out from that little what help you need.
Remember that we can't see your screen, access your HDD, or read your mind: we only get exactly what you type to work with. So we get no context to tell us what a "toll plazza list" might be, or what problem you might have showing it in maps - let alone what you have done so far that our code might have to fit into.
So stop trying to type as little as possible, and explain the context around your problem; tell us what you have tried; where you are stuck; what help you need. The better your question, the better our answers...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
What is your question?
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: What is your question? snd codz urgentz!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: snd codz urgentz!!! But a question will have one of these thingys "?". Am I the only one that knows that?
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes sir?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Can anyone please tell me what would be the most efficient way to calculate data.
I have to calculate 10000 items with 1000 algorithms each.
1. Have 10 different groups of data 100 algorithms each in various parts of my program, where it locks and unlocks the DataTable when storing.
or
2. Calculate 1000 algorithms all at once, locking and unlocking the DataTable only once.
Because 2 is a larger set of data to calculate other processes might have to wait more.
However 1 locks and unlocks many more times slowing down the process.
What is considered the best practice or rule to follow.
Thanks in advance,
Michael
|
|
|
|
|
Given a choice I would do this in a stored procedure in the database.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Are there any other constraints you did not tell us about?
If you don't mind the fact that you could loose all work that has already been done, then you calculate all results in memory and write them in one go. Otherwise, you'd best be working in batches.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
There's a lot of context missing here that means we can't advise you on the best approach. Do the algorithms work on the same data out of the DataTable? Do they each work on a different row? Do the effects of their calculations update the DataTable? Is this DataTable loaded once and then readonly for the lifetime of the application?
This space for rent
|
|
|
|