|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam cleared. Members on 4-5 atm.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
Top one gone - I took the liberty of updating the post.
Rest on a varied amount of kicks ... between 6 and 9
|
|
|
|
|
Final kick applied to most survivors. Only this one[^] left, currently on 9.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
No more...
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Question Removed Member on 3
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Kick Applied. Gone
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
|
This[^] taken from here[^]
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Member and Article Gone
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbelievable!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hard to believe that Mr. Maunder would be a co-author in this[^]
|
|
|
|
|
I think it's possible to add co-authors without they have to confirm. However, looking at that, I believe it would be a good idea to require confirmation from the co-author before they're added.
The quick red ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
I just posted a comment stating my doubts about Chris being involved in this.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
|
|
|
|