|
Having thought about this some more, I think there is an easier way. You should really be using the UpdateData[^] function to exchange information between the class variables and the dialog box. You just need to initialise the variable (if necessary) before calling DoModal on the dialog. Then you (i.e. the user) fill in the values in your various boxes and click OK, and the data is transferred into the variables. If you want interim values saved by pressing some other button, then you need to call UpdateData(TRUE) in that button's click handler. You may also need to modify the data exchange routines for some complex controls, so check the documentation for the control you are using.
|
|
|
|
|
I am not understanding the reply.
Quote: Having thought about this some more, I think there is an easier way. You should really be using the UpdateData[^] function to exchange information between the class variables and the dialog box. You just need to initialise the variable (if necessary) before calling DoModal on the dialog.
The new project is an MFC dialog and the net address control has been dropped on to the dialog. Why would I be calling DoModal?
Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree. I have seen and used many apps where I enter an IP address that display a small window with four fields of up to three digits, each field separated by dots. How is that display created and put in the dialog?
Thank you for your time
If you work with telemetry, please check this bulletin board: www.irigbb.com
|
|
|
|
|
bkelly13 wrote: Why would I be calling DoModal?
If it's an MFC dialog then that is effectively how it is run. The dialog is displayed on the screen, the user fills in the data and presses OK. At this point the code in the OnOK override captures the data from the dialog window and saves it in the class object's variables by a call to UpdateData(true).
I think you would be better with the CIPAddressCtrl Class[^], which is added to the dialog in the same way, as far as I am aware.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: If it's an MFC dialog then that is effectively how it is run.
When I drop a control onto a dialog, there has never been a need to call DoModal for that control. I tried dropping the Net Address Control onto the dialog and it did not work out well.
EDIT
After spending a couple of hours on this I managed to get the "IP Address Control" to display in the dialog tool box. Its under the Dialog Editor section of the toolbox. Now that I can drop that on to the dialog, my extended question about manually creating the dialog is no longer needed. (That would be the long reply that I am deleting and replacing with this.) Now that the dialog is there, adding a variable and getting the address is no trouble.
So thank you for your patience.
Thank you for your time
If you work with telemetry, please check this bulletin board: www.irigbb.com
modified 19-Oct-14 18:18pm.
|
|
|
|
|
dear Sir/madam,
I am pretty much familiar about working with c. Recently, I am supposed to do a project on serial port communication between two PCs using RS232 protocol with c. I am unfamiliar with the keyword and syntax required to accompany this task..kindly help with a tutorial on it
|
|
|
|
|
|
How do you know the poster is using Microsoft's tool or platform? Plenty of other compilers and platforms, and a C developer is more likely to be working on Unix variant or embedded system these days. I'd skip the "visual".
|
|
|
|
|
I guessed Visual C because this message board contains mostly windows development related posts. If OP needs another platform then modifying the search parameters isn't difficult. RS232 is a topic for which you can find very good tutorials on any platform very easily just by googling. I think OP was simply lazy to try that before posting here.
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough. I think it's likely OP posted in the wrong group, as neither A, W, or S TL are C libraries.
|
|
|
|
|
The syntax and APIs available depends on your operating system - Windows, OSX, Linux, Net/FreeBSD, Solaris, embedded OSs etc. First, do a search for "Serial port API" and your operating system.
As for how serial communications work, check Wikipedia[^], and pay attention to the hardware signalling and the fact that if you connect two computers, you need a "twisted" cable, and if you connect to a device, you need a "straight" one.
Oh, and this question rightly belong in the "C/C++" discussion forum rather than "ATL/WTL/STL".
|
|
|
|
|
Windows XP, Visual Studio 2008, MFC, Dialog, c++
A button in the main MFC dialog opens a second dialog with options to control the main app. In there is a button that starts disable and after a method is run, is to be enabled. The event handler that initiates that task and enables the button looks like this, so far:
void C_Prog_Control::OnBnClickBtnGetCurrentStates()
{
HWND *button_handle = NULL;
BOOL status = FALSE;
Get_Current_States();
GetDlgItem( IDC_DO_THIS, &button_handle )
status = EnableWindow( button_handle, TRUE );
}
Please forgive, but not ignore, any obvious typos as my work computer is in another room and cannot be connected to the internet. I cannot cut and paste. And now that's worse. I cannot post a message from work and must send the text home and post from there.
I have looked up the GetDlgItem() here: (When I paste in the Microsoft URL it will not display.)
And the EnableWindow function here: (Same for this link).
So the first looks like this on the MS web site:
HWND WINAPI GetDlgItem(
_In_opt_ HWND hDlg,
_In_ int nIDDlgItem
);
and the second looks like this:
BOOL WINAPI EnableWindow(
_In_ HWND hWnd,
_In_ BOOL bEnable
);
The EnableWindow code will not compile. The error is:
… error C2660: ‘CWnd::EnableWindow’ : function does not take 2 arguments.
The compiler does not see, or does not like that I want HWND::EnableWindow rather than CWnd. When I try to use CWnd there are other problems.
Intellisense shows the following signature:
BOOL EnableWindow( BOOL bEnable = 1 )
This differs from the MS page and there is only one signature.
So, given a button with the ID of: IDC_DO_THIS, how can I enable it?
EDIT RESOLVED
While at work, I stopped what I was doing several times and searched for the answer to this several times at work, through the Air Force Firewalls. After giving up there and posting this question from home, I finally found the good idea of searching from home. There in one of the first few pages was a good answer. Tried it, it worked. Just for the record:
void Cvs_2008_get_port_numberDlg::OnBnClickedButton3()
{
CWnd *pfield = GetDlgItem( IDC_BUTTON2 );
pfield->EnableWindow( FALSE );
}
My lesson, try a search at work, but if it does not turn up the answer, search again from home. I presume the Air Force, and all military sites, are attacked so often that they have little choice but to set up things the way they are.
Thank you for your time
If you work with telemetry, please check this bulletin board: www.irigbb.com
modified 8-Oct-14 22:20pm.
|
|
|
|
|
When searching MSDN for a particular Windows function you will generally find two links. One of them wil be in the form FunctionName(parameters), and the other Classname::FunctionName(parameters). If you are coding pure Win32 then you take the first form, and if you are using MFC you take the second. There are certain functions that do not have MFC equivalents, but that is generally clear from the context.
|
|
|
|
|
I had not noticed that, but will take the time to look for it now. It will probably help to incorporate those into my searches.
Thank you for taking the time to post that.
Thank you for your time
If you work with telemetry, please check this bulletin board: www.irigbb.com
|
|
|
|
|
Windows 7, Visual Studio 2008, MFC, C++, dialog
Making this short, after failing elsewhere I created a test project. The dialog has one edit box with the default ID of IDC_EDIT1. A button was created and the following code added for that button.
void Cvs_2008_get_port_numberDlg::OnBnClickedButton1()
{
UINT port_number;
BOOL status = FALSE;
int last_error = 0;
port_number = m_box_get_port_number.GetDlgItemInt( IDC_EDIT1, &status );
last_error = GetLastError();
}
Run the code, type in 123 in the edit box, press the button, and port_number gets zero. last_error gets value 1421, Control ID not found.
Some searching indicated that there may be a windows problem: http://www.errorfixes.net/error-1421-windows-7.php[^]
But I find myself skeptical of that.
Do I have a simple error that I can correct? Or is this a deeper problem?
Thank you for your time
If you work with telemetry, please check this bulletin board: www.irigbb.com
|
|
|
|
|
What is m_box_get_port_number in the above code? I would have expected to see something more like:
BOOL status = TRUE;
port_number = GetDlgItemInt( IDC_EDIT1, &status );
if (status = FALSE)
last_error = GetLastError();
Also, where is the button that this handler refers to: on the dialog or the main window?
|
|
|
|
|
I state up front that I am not experienced with GUIs. My tasks include VS MFS dialogs to control how the app runs and show its performance, but the app is a number cruncher and has no significant user interface. Once started there is no user interaction. The problem is probably a beginner's error so do not hesitate to ask or point out the basics.
This test app is an MFC dialog and has only one dialog. I don't know your intent in differentiating between "dialog or main window." It is only a few steps beyond a just created MFC dialog project.
So far in the test project there is one edit box, one check box, and one button. A right click on the edit box produced a drop down and "Add variable" was selected. The name used was m_box_get_port_number. I added the check for status per your code and it is returned with value 0, false. The error code remains 1421.
The one button has the event handler shown in the OP and runs that code.
Is all that of any use?
Thank you for your time
If you work with telemetry, please check this bulletin board: www.irigbb.com
|
|
|
|
|
If I understand what you are saying you have an MFC application that is a dialog; that's fairly standard. Within the dialog are a few controls, one of which is an edit box. You then say, "A right click on the edit box produced a drop down and "Add variable" was selected.". That part I don't understand, an edit box is just that, a box that you type text into which allows simple editing. What I would expect to happen would be that you would type something into the edit box, and then click the button. Your button handler would be something like:
void Cvs_2008_get_port_numberDlg::OnBnClickedButton1()
{
UINT port_number;
BOOL status;
int last_error = 0;
port_number = GetDlgItemInt( IDC_EDIT1, &status );
if (status == FALSE)
last_error = GetLastError();
When you prefix your call to GetDlgItemInt with m_box_get_port_number (the edit box variable name) you are trying to find the item IDC_EDIT1 within the edit control. But the edit control does not have a child window with that ID so the call fails.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello Richard,
Quote: You then say, "A right click on the edit box produced a drop down and "Add variable" was selected.". That part I don't understand, an edit box is just that, a box that you type text into which allows simple editing.
My understanding was that to get the value from a control a variable had to be attached to the control. A right click on that control solicits a dialog to add said variable. This method works when I want to get the state of a check box.
However, Now it is clear that this method does not work with the edit control. Following your template, heck, the exact code you wrote, I am able to get the value entered.
I need to take care when examining the results. A zero return value is legitimate only when status is also TRUE. If status is FALSE, then the returned integer is to be regarded as invalid.
OK, I will work with that.
I thank you for the time you spent explaining this.
Edit: Now I realize, or think I do, that my code was trying to reach inside that edit box, which is really a window itself, and try to find another control with that ID of IDC_EDIT1.
Thank you for your time
If you work with telemetry, please check this bulletin board: www.irigbb.com
|
|
|
|
|
bkelly13 wrote: A right click on that control solicits a dialog
I get it now, you were talking about the MFC Class Wizard being used when you develop the application; a long time since I used MFC.
bkelly13 wrote: Now I realize, or think I do, that my code was trying to reach inside that edit box ...
Yes, you got it.
Glad you got things working.
|
|
|
|
|
I have the following structure defined inside my DLL and a COM component we developed.
struct ContentStr
{
ContentStr():ptr(NULL), contSize(0), structSize(0), X(0), Y(0){}
const BYTE* ptr;
int contSize;
int structSize;
//output
std::vector<byte> m_v_Data;
int X;
int Y;
private:
ContentStr ( const ContentStr & rhs );
ContentStr & operator= ( const ContentStr & rhs );
};
The COM component invokes a DllExport method in the DLL which accepts the structure as reference and fills its value. It was working fine in VS2008. Recently I ported my code base to VS2013. Now the method throws exception when invoked. When I checked the size of the structure using sizeof operator, I was surprised a bit.
VS 2008:
/*Inside COM*/ sizeof(ContentStr) = 40
/*Inside DLL*/ sizeof(ContentStr) = 40
VS 2013:
/*Inside COM*/ sizeof(ContentStr) = 36
/*Inside DLL*/ sizeof(ContentStr) = 32
I could see that the difference in size is due to the difference in vector size. Searching the internet gave me huge confusion hence I am posting this question on the expert forum. Could someone please explain me why is this difference seen in the sizes and help me find a solution.
Kings
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see how std::vector m_v_Data; will compile; vector is a template class and needs a type to define it.
[edit]
In VS2010 I get 20 for the size of a vector<int>, and in VS2013 I get 16. There must be some other difference in your DLL code that reduces the total by another 4 bytes.
[/edit]
modified 2-Oct-14 3:39am.
|
|
|
|
|
it is vector of BYTE, sorry the code got modified when entered in the editor
Kings
|
|
|
|
|
My apologies also, I think your code got mangled by the HTML tags, you need to use <pre> tags around it (use the code button above the edit window) so it shows up, like:
std::vector<BYTE> m_v_Data;
int X;
int Y;
There is obviously some difference between your application and your DLL. Are they both compiled with the exact same definition for your structure, i.e. using a common header file?
|
|
|
|
|
No they are not, the DLL contains a Util method which is exposed using DLLExport and the COM loads the DLL and creates a method pointer out of it and asks it to fill the data.
Kings
|
|
|
|
|
Well you need to show us the exact code in the application and the DLL, so we can try to figure out what the difference may be.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
