|
If you are still using System.Data.SqlClient, you just have to replace the old library with the new one, as it is a true drop-in replacement. All you code will still work as before. But it will be more future-proof. Just like it always was, but different
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: as it is a true drop-in replacement. All you code will still work as before. That's what they say about the windows update too...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Ouch!
So true, though.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, hey, hey, don't mock those new icons!
|
|
|
|
|
The team describes its technology as similar to the art of paper cutting, but a much smaller scale. Taping them back together may take a while
modified 22-Jun-20 16:35pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You might want to repair the link...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed, thank you.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
You are welcome.
BTW interesting read. But I suppose it will get a while until the can really reproduce it in more "conventional" conditions
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
True, but it did strike me as a simple solution (as far as nano-stuff goes anyway). So, perhaps it may be able to "scale" to non-lab situations?
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: perhaps it may be able to "scale" to non-lab situations? I hope so, that has potential to be a game changer. Not only in nano-electronics, it might get used in materials structures and other stuff too (if I am not misunderstanding it).
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 23-Jun-20 7:00am.
|
|
|
|
|
Amid the many details about this new hardware and plan was mention of the Developer Transition Kit (DTK), a product that will help developers build and test their Universal 2 apps for use with the new systems. Buy the SDK, get a free computer! (for a while)
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: get a free computer! (for a while) Probably until the go past the alpha status and then you have to buy the new computer for 3x times the normal price.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I certainly laughed at it at the time, but Steve Ballmer's 'Developer' rant is something Apple is sorely missing (with their 32 bit apps now worthless, and this coming C****** F***).
|
|
|
|
|
For $500, we'll throw in a BeagleBoard! (But it says Mac on it, so it's worth millions!)
|
|
|
|
|
During its virtual WWDC keynote, Apple showed off a new way to access your vehicle: CarKey. CarKey is a quick, virtual way to unlock and start your car with just your iPhone. I can't see anything going wrong with this feature
On the bright side, you'll only lose your 5-series BMW. I mean, those are cheap, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I can't see anything going wrong with this feature You need glasses. Really, you need glasses...
I only hope that the car manufacturesrs are not so dumb to get into the hype and don't produce standard keys anymore...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In many situations, there is only one possible type allowed in a given place. And yet C# still requires you to explicitly list the type. It's the new new
Assuming it ever makes it past the proposal stage
|
|
|
|
|
First came:
Dictionary<string, List<int>> field = new Dictionary<string, List<int>>();
Then came:
var field = new Dictionary<string, List<int>>();
Now they're proposing:
Dictionary<string, List<int>> field = new();
Heck, why not go for gold:
var field = new();
and figure it out from the future usage.
|
|
|
|
|
You're getting quite close to Javascript there!
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't new() implied if later used? Just use var field; !
|
|
|
|
|
Burn the heretic!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
If I could choose. I would keep with:Marc Clifton wrote: Then came:
var field = new Dictionary<string, List<int>>(); If the compiler doesn't care between #2 and #3, I find #2 easier to read
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Cloud security: Microsoft details how sophisticated attacks can move quickly from a small breach to a big problem. Maybe if you didn't just watch them, they wouldn't have taken over?
|
|
|
|
|
Oracle laughs at such pretention
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmarks suggest programming language Julia may be the best choice for big-data analysis using CSV format files. "Half of what I say is meaningless, but I say it just to reach you, Julia"
I'm not sure those are the two languages you want to be picking a speed fight with...
|
|
|
|