|
Ravi Bhavnani wrote: An agile organization makes sense to me today. Maybe because I learned agile isn't some voodoo you throw on a project to make it magically ship on time, but is a way of running a development organization.
I hear you. I'm partly hesitant as I'm feeling a bit out of the biz these days. I see the value in it. I'm resistant to the religion, but I've always pushed for many of the same ideas: small, rapid cycles, heavy customer involvement, etc. I'm sure if I were involved in a real agile project, I'd love it.
--------------
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I would say that Agile has always been with us. The problem is that then somebody thought that they way to do things was top down. Those projects tend to fail unless there is a lot of government money behind them, and usually they are never pointed to as being an example of how to do a project. A lot of people made a lot of money and fame by proposing to go with top down. Often they left the project before it failed and thus the blame was not pointed at them (ie FAA's Advanced Automation System). The government still has not learned that top down is an expensive approach.
|
|
|
|
|
It is used in places like Microsoft and SAP, so it must be mainstream.
Not that it makes any difference...
|
|
|
|
|
During the past year though I decided I don't want to write software for WinRT, simply because I find the .NET version Microsoft has released for WinRT beyond crap and I don't want to go through a Compact Framework nightmare yet again. "You can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave."
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for posting this.
This is a good heads-up as I was looking at getting one of these things.
|
|
|
|
|
There’s actually over 400 open source VM images available, made by the community and companies like BitNami, and hosted by MS Open Tech. It's like your work is virtually complete!
|
|
|
|
|
Master motivation and time management. Unleash your personal productivity. Set powerful goals. Focus and direct your attention with skill. Learn the secrets of work-life balance. Assuming you have the time to learn time management
[edit] I should add that JD was one of the more awesome individuals I had the great luck to meet when I was at the Fish Shop. He was one of the core drivers behind learning from the customers, that lead to the creation of these books/sites[^].
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Assuming you have the time to learn time management
And assuming you work in a vacuum. The minute you depend on someone else, your personal productivity literally goes into the sh*tter. (heehee[^]).
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
true. dat.
I literally literalled at that one.
--------------
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Do you literally mean literally, or do you mean not literally?
|
|
|
|
|
Uhm...
Yes?
No, wait. I literally mean literally, yes.
--------------
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
A few months ago in its "Scroogled" ad campaign, Microsoft was complaining about how Google uses your search terms and Gmail contents to deliver targeted ads. Now, Microsoft is touting how Windows 8.1 uses your search terms to deliver targeted ads, even when you're doing searches on local drives. "The All-seeing Eye of Agamotto sees all"
|
|
|
|
|
Petard! Fetch the Petard! Quick, tie us to it, then run it up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes...
And, yes, I do know what a Petard is...
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
And hoist they be.
They just aren't that good at this marketing thing at (most of the) times.
--------------
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Ptttthhhwep! You owe me a monitor wipe!
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: A few months ago in its "Scroogled" ad campaign, Microsoft was complaining about how Google uses your search terms and Gmail contents to deliver targeted ads. Now, Microsoft is touting how Windows 8.1 uses your search terms to deliver targeted ads, even when you're doing searches on local drives.
Except that they don't.
Quote: Editor's note: Microsoft has requested the following clarification: "Bing Ads are integrated only in the web search portion of Windows 8.1 Smart Search -- the ads are never shown in local device search results or searches."
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the local part was wrong, but even so: Microsoft complains that Google uses the search (and email) data to target ads, then does it themselves. It still strikes me as a little hypocritical, even if most of the article/rant was wrong.
--------------
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously? Whenever I see a link to a Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols article with Microsoft in the title, I know there's no point in clicking it, much less reading it. He is 100% predictable--the article will be yet-another-in-a-long-series anti-Microsoft rant of no value to anyone but his fellow We Hate All Things Microsoft cultists.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
True, but a stopped clock etc.
Occasionally, his rants are almost accurate. OK, not this time, but still
--------------
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: True, but a stopped clock etc.
... makes a half decent LART for use against fanbois and haters alike.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, waging all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I'll grant that sometimes his rants contain a grain or two of truth, as do all effective lies. But I maintain they are useless as part of any honest effort to evaluate a Microsoft product or service.
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.
|
|
|
|
|
Twenty people were injured, with seven sent to hospital, when a promotional stunt in Seoul for LG's G2 smartphone went wrong, the company has said. "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly."
|
|
|
|
|
The exact sales of Microsoft's Surface RT tablets are the subject of a newly filed class action lawsuit against the company. The lawsuit alleges that Microsoft has issued "false and misleading statements" concerning the sales of its first PC hardware product, which Microsoft launched in October 2012. Not that they're selling, but that they are not selling
|
|
|
|
|
Wow what people won't sue over.
I only got about half way thru that long winded complaint.
If they were stupid enough to buy in at that time on an iffy product then.....
|
|
|
|
|
then....
They deserve to be protected from those that would take advantage of them by making misleading claims.
An alternative may be to allow companies to advertise whatever and however the hell they feel like and just write-off any problems with 'truth abberations' with the phrase "Well, if you were foolish enough to buy X, Y or Z...."
I've always viewed them (Surface RT) as a plastic brick. But the question is, am I clever through my own work and efforts, or am I lucky thanks to my genes and the tendencies they've imparted? Is someone unlucky to be unable to see through the falsehoods or are they too lazy to have educated themselves more thoroughly?
I used to think the answer was very straight-forward. I'm no longer so sure. People are a lot more complicated than all of the things they construct.
"Science adjusts its views based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observation, so that belief can be preserved." - Tim Minchin
|
|
|
|