|
Concise communication can help technical teams clearly relay complex information, a crucial collaborative element as the workforce shifts online. Because
|
|
|
|
|
|
really?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is giving Windows users far greater control over graphics settings to allow anyone with multiple GPUs to customize how and when they are used. Now I can always run FreeCell so it sounds like I'm in a wind tunnel
|
|
|
|
|
Yale physicists have developed an error-correcting cat — a new device that combines the Schrödinger’s cat concept of superposition (a physical system existing in two states at once) with the ability to fix some of the trickiest errors in a quantum computation. But cats are infallible (at least that's what my cat tells me)
If it looks like they made a mistake, they intended to do it that way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting read, even though I basically don't play computer games. Thanks for posting.
|
|
|
|
|
Does anyone else think you are getting substituted to a worse product?
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. I hate YouTube Music's UI, especially in comparison with Play Music.
The only plus to YouTube Music is that it has more music (videos that others have posted).
|
|
|
|
|
Black silicon photodetector breaks the 100% efficiency limit
Serious question: if true, how is this not an example of entropy of a system decreasing? I must be missing something, because entropy always increases, but the article doesn't give enough info to tell. Could it be that the energy level of the photon was initially higher than the energy level of the electron?
After some thought, that must be it. So the title is a little misleading??? Even though it says "...The external quantum efficiency of a device is 100% when one incoming photon generates one electron to the external circuit..." Kind of a misleading definition of efficiency?
|
|
|
|
|
Efficiency may be defined in many ways, not necessarily related to energy usage.
- Energy efficiency - the ratio of energy going in to "work" coming out
- Particle efficiency - the ratio of photons going in to electrons coming out
- ...
It all depends on what you want to measure.
In a photomultiplier, which is hardly a new device, a single input photon can trigger multiple output electrons, at the cost of supplying additional energy to the system.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Be careful you measure the right things. You will optimize for what you measure, not what you need.
Remember when programmers were measured in Lines of Code, and number of Bugs fixed.
Also known as the Cobra effect - Wikipedia
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
But if the rat is making bar presses and you're busy tallying the number of food pellets delivered by lifting your pencil to make a scratch mark in your notebook, the rat might see you being inattentive and change his behavior accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apple and Google are acting like bullies, but Epic has tried to fool the rules.
IMO both sides are right, what actually means too that both sides are wrong.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Calls via the LTE mobile network, also known as 4G, are encrypted and should therefore be tap-proof. Posted entirely to scare the bejeebers out of you (but don't worry too much)
One of the most obscure hacks out there, IMO: "They were able to decrypt the contents of telephone calls if they were in the same radio cell as their target, whose mobile phone they then called immediately following the call they wanted to intercept."
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: One of the most obscure hacks out there, IMO ... and relies on the cell violating the GSM spec and reusing keys.
Cheers,
Peter
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
How many hacks do you know that don't rely on incompetence, lack of ability, lack of ethics, greed or a mix of all along the chain of the product?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Unless you define incompetence/lack of ability as anything short of perfection, not many
|
|
|
|
|
Jon McKee wrote: Unless you define incompetence/lack of ability as you don't often visit the Q&A section... do you?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, I meant it more like if you define it that way, the answer is none, but if you don't, there are some that are reasonable because they deal with some really complex stuff (like many of the linux kernel exploits).
|
|
|
|
|
fair enough
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: many hacks do you know that don't rely on incompetence, lack of ability, lack of ethics, greed or a mix of all along the chain of the product?
Not sure it really matters. Nothing is unhackable.
Social Media - A platform that makes it easier for the crazies to find each other.
Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it.
Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.
|
|
|
|
|
ZurdoDev wrote:
Not sure it really matters. Nothing is unhackable. That is what doesn't really matters... There is no 100% security, that's something already known... but has to be that easy so often?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In this post, App. Dev. Manager Vishal Saroopchand showcase similarities and differences on important topics for C# developers learning Go.
|
|
|
|