|
It seems to me that MIT is doing its absolute best to destroy its a-bit-higher-than-middling reputation -- and is making a spectacularly good job of it.
It might be time to look for the bad apple who is leading colleagues in that direction.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Developers have been lauded as being early adopters when it comes to technology products, but they seem to be late bloomers when it comes to dropping old habits. IOpinion
Or I guess rather, "HeOpinion". IHaveNoOpinion on the matter. (actually, I like IInterface, but perhaps I need to listen to him or something)
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Let it go. It’s over. Hungarian Notation lost in 2003.
I hate excessive Hungarian as much as the next man - "intCount", "strName" and so forth are so absolutely dripping in redundancy that it hurts to look at them - but I'm not sure that the Great Hungarian Notation War should have led to total annihilation.
Yes, the "I" is a Hungarian throwback to some extent but effectively, it's telling me something in the way that a lot of other naming conventions are telling me something so that makes it no different from the case of the initial letter or a preceding underscore. Nobody has a problem with those.
Does it encourage people to think of a 1:1 relationship between interface and implementation? Yes, I think it does to an extent. This really is the nub of the anti-I argument and I do get where it's coming from, but personally, I'd rather have the same conventions running through everything and that for me is the clincher. Whether we like it or not (and heck, I'm not going to lose any sleep over it, either way) any .NET library that you'll ever work with is going to use the "I" prefix and for me code consistency is often more important than ideological purity.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for stating the case so well. Hungarian notation may be officially dead, but I still use it, though I have adapted my thinking somewhat, and I have begun to refrain from using it on the inputs to public methods that resemble or augment widely used interfaces.
IMO, Hungarian notation encapsulates essential information in a name, so that it conveys basic type and scope information without requiring an upward search of the code in which it appears.
David A. Gray
Delivering Solutions for the Ages, One Problem at a Time
Interpreting the Fundamental Principle of Tabular Reporting
|
|
|
|
|
The only place I really see Hungarian Notation at work is in our databases; and that is limited to the names of tables and views.
As for this article... While this is mostly about one person's opinion the opening code sample has a bigger vulnerability; and we wonder why SQL Injection still exists
public class clsPerson
{
var strName = txtName.Value;
public fnGetByName()
{
var strQuery = "SELECT * FROM tblPeople WHERE Name = " + strName;
}
}
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
I know some C# developer who - after reading some chapters of Uncle Bob's Clean Code - decided to omit the "I" in interface names, but to add "Impl" for classes implementing an interface...
Oh sanctissimi Wilhelmus, Theodorus, et Fredericus!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: A bonus third level is that interfaces should be used like classes. They are, after all, abstractions of those classes.
Should be used like Classes: over my dead keyboard. This is like saying a curly tail is an abstraction of a pig 
I find Hungarian useful in naming Controls because the VS Property Browser (F4) shows them in alphabetical order.
«Where is the Life we have lost in living? Where is the wisdom we have lost in knowledge? Where is the knowledge we have lost in information?» T. S. Elliot
|
|
|
|
|
Pick a style guide, and stick to...
... No, on second thoughts, burn the lot of 'em, and do what's best for you and your colleagues.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Different styles are like different sauces... perfect for spaghetti code
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
Google emails users: "the following apps may no longer be able to access your data." They've run out of their own apps to shut down?
Yes, that's also the featured comment, but I came up with it independently.
|
|
|
|
|
Slap on some solar panels and a control board and it flies for a half-second. Then we mount the autocannon on it for real fun!
Black Mirror as documentary, part B.
|
|
|
|
|
Nuthin' special.
Doctor Doom had these in the 1960s.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The software update was supposed to improve safety after the jets were grounded worldwide following two fatal crashes. Who needs tests when you can just keep poking at the code until the planes stop crashing
We're Agile!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Boeing has traced the issue to a microprocessor and how the chip handles data
Is that the new way of saying 'we found a bug in the code'?
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
I know I blame Intel whenever a bug is found in my code. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
The old 'It's a hardware problem' defense, a classic from way back.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Pilots testing the MCAS update in a simulator, however, found that it took them too long to recover the airplane if the software was trying to avoid a stall
My god, how hard is it to have a button that says "screw you, MCAS, give me control?" OK, yet another button, but there must be other alternatives equally simple. But what do I know?
Latest Article - A 4-Stack rPI Cluster with WiFi-Ethernet Bridging
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Marc Clifton wrote: But what do I know?
More than some Boeing engineers, apparently. 
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
From my understanding there is a switch/toggle to turn off MCAS.
The problem is that if you switch off MCAS while the trim is down the only way to retrim the aircraft is with the trim wheel, as using the trim switches on the yoke switch MCAS back on. That means if you switch off MCAS when the aircraft is in a dive you have 250+ turns of that wheel to make before the trim is back to its neutral position.
“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.”
― Christopher Hitchens
|
|
|
|
|
Also, the higher the airspeed, the more difficult it is to move that wheel. Based on multiple news reports, at any rate.
|
|
|
|
|
They'll find a missing hyphen in the code.
|
|
|
|
|
The goal of this post is to explore some concrete applications of this strange new operator and its associated counterpart, the operator== (yes it has been changed, for the better!), all while providing some guidelines for its use in everyday code. And I think it's gonna be a long, long time before I use this one
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not the programmer they think I am at home... ![Rose | [Rose]](https://www.codeproject.com/script/Forums/Images/rose.gif)
Actually, this is pretty cool. <=>!!
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
The latest version of the bot detector reCaptcha is invisible to users and has spread to more than 650,000 websites. It’s great for security—but not so great for your privacy. You had me at Google and 'dark side'
They have cookies!
|
|
|
|
|
In the days of ReCaptcha mk 1 (type out the non-words written in illegible text) I used to think that it was the worst thing ever.
Then came ReCaptcha mk 2 (tick the pictures which have x in them, even though they arguably all do or don't) I was forced to update that opinion.
Now we have one that assumes that anyone with a Google account is human and anyone without one is not and I sense that I'll soon be updating that opinion again.
Taking something awful and successfully making it worse with every single iteration is clearly a skill of sorts, but it's not one that should be inflicted upon the public.
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect. - Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
