|
I guess we need more tools to enforce programming discipline^^
|
|
|
|
|
I thought the article was terrible. For example, the engineers I've worked with have been very expert in their vertical markets. (In one company, the lead engineer and CEO knew the market as well, if not better, than the customer. The sales manager, on the other hand, was a moron.)
A bigger problem with the article is that the author lumps all software and tools to improve that software together. The solution for software which drives actuators based on sensor input is different than software managing a warehouse which is different from software managing a bank and so on.
Then I cracked up when he just accepted the claims that such-and-such system worked. But, he got paid by the word so....
|
|
|
|
|
Most scientists equate tool use with intelligence. Hmmm.
|
|
|
|
|
Shortly after I graduated, I started seeing the second iteration of this technique. I started seeing companies look for a “Rock Star Developer” or “Code Ninja” to join their team in the Web 2.0 era. "Gotta keep on rockin', that boy has got to stay on top"
|
|
|
|
|
OH...  This explains why my recent application got rejected. Being a world-class geek isn't that cool after all. 
|
|
|
|
|
"He heard one guitar, just blew him away"
Someone's therapist knows all about you!
|
|
|
|
|
Do developers really identify with such inane role titles? Or is it flashy startups thinking this is how you attract the best talent?
I would never go near a role or company that advertised such role titles. At best it shows a level of vanity and narcissism in anyone who actually does identify with such role titles.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
The generation who views taking dozens of mugshots of themselves daily as normal instead of an indication of extreme narcissism does. /ElphantItImtooYoungToBeAGrumpyOldMan
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
what is a developer "rockstar"? Putting labels like that IS THE problem. There are in many teams mediocre but super ambitious types, who love to play politics by putting labels like that on the very people who actually do the job.
I have such a mediocre idiot on my team. Every time we sit down to discuss something, he completely avoids his part and immediately starts to nit pick and argue about my part. After arguing for around 15 minutes, I tell him to go f*** himself, things get escalated to the boss, we discuss it again, waste another 30 minutes, then we agree to do it my way and I feel pissed off and exausted.
Now he goes around and tells everybody I'm the rock star.
modified 20-Oct-19 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
The problem isn't hiring "rock star developers", but the expectations of those who want to. Having interviewed at such companies, more often than not, what they believe software can do and how long it takes to do it are completed at odds with reality.
|
|
|
|
|
With only a couple more months left of the year, Gartner is already looking ahead to the future. "The future will soon be a thing of the past."
|
|
|
|
|
My prediction is that Gartner will continue pulling ideas out of their ass and suckers customers will continue to pay them to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
90% more accurate than most of Gartner's as well!
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Technologies from several projects will provide a pipeline of new capabilities in Java 18.3 and later versions Checks current C# feature set...
|
|
|
|
|
The new system would make use of tiny disturbances in magnetic orientation, which have been dubbed "skyrmions." Sorry, I took an arrow to the knee and can't come up with a blurb
I think that might not even be funny if you get the reference.
edit: yeah, I has brain hurtz
modified 4-Oct-17 10:30am.
|
|
|
|
|
I used to be a coder like you before...
But then you know, the arrow... 
|
|
|
|
|
Wow.. I sense a disturbance in the force with that one! 
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I took an arrow to the knee
"Message for you, Sir!"
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
I fail to see the connection between the phys.org article and the debunking of beliefs about the best way to manage emails, unless the improved speeds of computers will necessitate managing, as there will be so many more emails?
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you used the wrong subject for this message. (see below)
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
You could have said remoove instead of bypass. Yeah, I'm not getting anything either.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: magnetic orientation
Monopoles? Where's Sheldon? Or was that the can opener?
|
|
|
|
|
Do you believe emailing gets in the way of more important tasks at work – or that checking your inbox only a few times a day is the most efficient approach? So ignoring them until the sender retires isn't a good idea?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: So ignoring them until the sender retires isn't a good idea?
It's worked for me so far... If you disagree, just email me - I can wait.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
For someone relatively new to the field of programming, the subject of code comments would cause some definite confusion. That’s because experienced folks in the field can’t seem to agree on the topic. /* ' # REM <!-- something goes here --> */
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
