|
It doesn't, from experience.
My first attempt was running on a Pi and it was limited indeed, but worked. The current one is a cheap desktop.
State your arguments for your statement.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Non server operating system has a limited amount of simultaneous open sockets it can serve. So it either he ran out of sockets first, or the memory/processing power second. Either way I would go with linux server if the money is an issue
|
|
|
|
|
Given he's talking about "PC 2 and PC 3", I doubt he's expecting hundreds of simultaneous users...
|
|
|
|
|
You can't even copy and paste your own detritus ... how do you expect to copy and paste from others?
It was only in wine that he laid down no limit for himself, but he did not allow himself to be confused by it.
― Confucian Analects: Rules of Confucius about his food
|
|
|
|
|
nalb4242 wrote: for example let pc2 and and pc3 which are not on same network of pc1 to access pc1 That sound "local", not internet access. Which of the two are you trying to achieve?
If the latter; you may already have checked all config on your PC, and it not the problem. The router is. You'd need to allow outside stuff to access your server and have it respond.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't. You can get full IIS web hosting, with MySql and even MS Sql, oodles of space and a far more reliable and secure setup than you will be able to configure on your Win10 box, for under £3 / month. Managed using Plesk and with FTP access too. You can make your site(s) private if you wish as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Sleeping and holding his cellphone right up to his face.
I should take ransom photos.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Keep us informed of recent developments!
|
|
|
|
|
And _pleeeaaassse_ don't foget to post them on 'Where I am: Member Photos'
modified 27-Mar-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was my first thought, too ...
|
|
|
|
|
Given the amount of time you spend coding I don't blame him
"I didn't mention the bats - he'd see them soon enough" - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
well ,you're married... fml
Charlie Gilley
<italic>Stuck in a dysfunctional matrix from which I must escape...
"Where liberty dwells, there is my country." B. Franklin, 1783
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's twist again!
(unshielded)
|
|
|
|
|
Don't bogart that... oh no sorry, that was something later
modified 27-Mar-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
RickZeeland wrote: Let's twist again!
(unshielded) That sounds like something that might be triple X rated.
|
|
|
|
|
That was absolutely not my intention!
|
|
|
|
|
Triple X rated?
I never thought of that in all the years I heard the words "twisted pair", referring to the wires used to connect the telephone network. "Silver satin" took over in the 1990s.
modified 17-Feb-21 0:49am.
|
|
|
|
|
I went to download something this morning and I was downloading at a paltry 6MB/s and change. (about 50MBits/s)
Normally it's closer to 25MB/s (200MBits/s)
I spent 20 minutes dealing with my ISP - between furbling through their automated system and troubleshooting with the rep (a very pleasant and competent woman. On an unrelated note I always feel good about getting Indians versus Americans on tech support. For some reason they tend to know what they're doing more of the time, in my experience and I'm used to their accents anyway so they aren't hard to understand over the phone. I think that puts me in the minority with respect to that opinion though)
Anyway, after going through the motions of restarting the modem, and checking my wireless LAN for any interlopers, I finally rebooted my machine. I figured I might as well. I kind of enjoy it, since it starts windows so fast.
All of the sudden my download speeds are back up to where they're supposed to be, but my upload speed is now averaging about 1.7MBits/s. Far worse than what it was before the reboot, and obviously not even close to reflective of my ISP's connection speeds with this package.
What the heck, Microsoft? Your "security" updates *always* elephanted. Just stop trying.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: What the heck, Microsoft? Your "security" are updates *always* elephanted. Just stop trying. Complaining about updates? You can turn those off.
We choose not to.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Turning them off leads to other problems. With microsoft you just can't win for losing.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Turning them off leads to other problems. His choice; and the fact 'e's complaing, proves 'e think there a better alternative. Easy alternative is to not update.
honey the codewitch wrote: With microsoft you just can't win for losing Is it? Did you try OS4 warp?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
IBM doesn't know how to build operating systems. Every operating system they've ever inflicted on the world proves it.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: IBM doesn't know how to build operating systems. So, both IBM and MS make bad operating systems, that what you saying?
My favorite is the AmigaOS. Yours, I'd guess to be Linux, since you disapprove of the mainstream.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|