|
β¬π¨π¨β¬β¬
β¬β¬β¬π¨β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 926 2/6
π¨β¬β¬β¬π¨
π©π©π©π©π©
One of those rare lucky occasions, that too on New Year's Day.
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 926 5/6
π¨β¬β¬π¨β¬
β¬π¨π¨β¬β¬
β¬π¨π©π¨β¬
β¬β¬π©π©π©
π©π©π©π©π©
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 926 3/6
β¬π¨π¨β¬β¬
β¬β¬π©π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 926 5/6*
π¨β¬β¬β¬β¬
β¬β¬π¨π¨β¬
β¬π¨π¨β¬π©
β¬π¨π©β¬π©
π©π©π©π©π©
|
|
|
|
|
My wife and I have not been up for midnight in a long time, so this year feels special.
My best wishes to everyone here on the Code Project, and looking forward to seeing all they happens in this year....
|
|
|
|
|
GitHub - virejdasani/pythOwO: an UwU programming language[^]
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
|
UwU-ized Python.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Whooosh... right past me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess it is more caution than laziness. Some of us do not trust just any link to be "good natured".
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but what precisely is "UwU"?
|
|
|
|
|
Technology used for Python UwU-izing.
|
|
|
|
|
The author needs either a speech therapist or a spelling checker. Possibly both. What a waste of time, effort, and computer cycles!
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
For those wondering what this is all about:
"UwU is a joke esoteric programming language designed by User: KiraRose. It is exactly like Brainfuck but uses UwU faces making it a member of the TrivialBrainfuckSubstitution family of programming languages" according to UwU - Esolang[^]
|
|
|
|
|
When I searched for UwU online, all that came up was that this was some sort of Japanese emoji.
I couldn't see the relevance...
|
|
|
|
|
As if Python isn't bad enough
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
But is it Turing Complete?
|
|
|
|
|
is it f*ck
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
I just saw an ad on CP for Grammerly, a service that helps you with your writing by correcting spelling and grammar mistakes.
But imagine what it must be capable of in this age of Generative AI. It could do things like suggest a more sophisticated sentence structure, and be able to word it correctly even if the author writes on a 4th grade level.
Right now, we're probably reading articles composed by AI, or significantly enhanced by AI.
Pretty soon, you won't be able to trust anything you read online!
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
My New Year wish:
May all of us be granted the ability to clearly distinguish between AI concoctions and NI (natural intelligence) creations.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Pretty soon, you won't be able to trust anything you read online!
Do you actually mean to say that there is anything trustworthy online today?
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: It could do things like suggest a more sophisticated sentence structure, and be able to word it correctly even if the author writes on a 4th grade level.
Would that user be able to correctly recognize that the suggested structure was better versus just AI gibberish?
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Andrew x64 wrote: Right now, we're probably reading articles composed by AI, or significantly enhanced by AI.
Pretty soon, you won't be able to trust anything you read online!
Written that way, you make it sound like the "trustworthiness" criteria depends upon whether something's been written by a human vs an AI. I don't have that much faith in my fellow humans...
|
|
|
|