|
den2k88 wrote: coworkers
Is it that some of them were just pretending to laugh, even while being equally un-privy to?
|
|
|
|
|
We went to college together, are roughly the same age and all have a similarly deranged sense of humour. They are coworkers but I can easily call them friends.
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Watch out for cow orkers
CQ de W5ALT
Walt Fair, Jr.PhD P. E.
Comport Computing
Specializing in Technical Engineering Software
|
|
|
|
|
The older one gets, the higher the humor threshold becomes.
If you eliminate finding humor in other's mis-fortune your basically no fun anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll never take someone serious that can't laugh on himself.
Said that... other's (specially if trusted friends) misfortunes can be so damned funny...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Celebrating little victories by combining some hobbies together
Maybe I'll make a Pip-boy[^]
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 5/6
⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨
🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜🟨🟨🟩
🟨⬜🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 4/6*
⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟨⬜⬜🟩
🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 4/6*
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 3/6
⬜🟩⬜🟨⬜
🟨🟩🟩⬜⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Within you lies the power for good - Use it!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 4/6*
⬛🟨⬛⬛🟩
⬛⬛⬛🟩🟩
⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 3/6
⬛⬛⬛🟨🟩
⬛🟩⬛⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Ok, I have had my coffee, so you can all come out now!
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 4/6
🟨⬛🟨⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛
🟨🟩🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 3/6
🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜
🟨🟩⬜⬜🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 2/6*
⬜⬜⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Happiness will never come to those who fail to appreciate what they already have. -Anon
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music. -Frederick Nietzsche
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 5/6
⬛🟨⬛🟨🟨
🟨🟩🟨⬛⬛
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Wordle 1,160 3/6
🟨🟩⬜⬜⬜
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Edit: Actual photographic evidence of victory non-trivial SVG document[^]
parse_res.attr[0].strokeDashCount = 0;
It has taken me a day of extremely stressful hair pulling to find that this line of code didn't exist and it should have.
It was manifesting as a stack overflow, so I spent my day, tracking that, and pruning the stack.
Here was the offending code that caused the memory corruption that reported as a stack issue.
for (i = 0; i < attr->strokeDashCount; i++)
shape->stroke_dash_array[i] = attr->strokeDashArray[i] * scale;
Here the strokeDashCount value was a ridiculously high garbage number, with (un)predictable results.
This never would have happened in a high level language.
I love me some C and C++. It's an incredible programming language family, but also a very powerful weapon you can wield against yourself if you're not careful.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
modified 21-Aug-24 23:38pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I utilize the subscript operator w/ extreme caution. Only if the size is confirmed and the index checked against it do I utilize it.
|
|
|
|
|
It was checked. But the number it was checked against was garbage.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
Am a bit surprised you did not utilize an assert to verify the size of the indexed object is in fact the presumed quantity as stored in variable.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't like using assert() because it simply causes a bootloop on these devices when hit. I don't have a debugger.
Also this code did not originate with me. I forked it from another project, and have done a lot of work to it, but a significant portion I have yet to touch.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
May I inquire means by which garbage value originated.
|
|
|
|
|
solar flares probably.
It's what happens in C and C++ when you don't initialize a value explicitly on a release build. It's garbage. leftover bits in stale ram.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|