|
...and a witness protection thingy.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
I think I married her sister!
Life is hard....
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome! maybe you can tell something about yourself, what your interests are etc.
You can also add this to your CodeProject profile of course.
|
|
|
|
|
Proper spelling and grammar are key.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome user 1566... You probably want to change your display name so we can more easily recognize and remember you.
You can do this at the top right of the site.
Hover over your name and click "My settings".
You can change your display name and username there (your username is how people can @mention you and how people can link to your profile /members/username).
To sum up over 10 years of CP for me:
I still don't get the daily CCC (Cryptic Crossword third C).
We've recently started playing Wordle.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the third 'C' is Clue. If someone left it out, I'd expect to see an entire crossword. 
|
|
|
|
|
Please don't suggest that to OG, you know he would post an entire crossword. 
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome
The most expensive tool is a cheap tool. Gareth Branwyn
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome. Check it regularly and you will learn some handy things.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Recently I got a comment on one of my articles here, and I couldn't tell if it was a defective spambot or not due to the title "Language Basics Crash Course" and a message that was completely out of context (about javascript on a C++ article)
I replied because of the ambiguity, and corrected their comment since the article was C++. Then another commenter (a real one) joined in the discussion. A couple replies later, I get a spambot replying to my reply.
I suspect within a decade the spambots here will have whole conversations with each other.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I suspect within a decade the spambots here will have whole conversations with each other.
Pretty sure they already are on certain social media.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
When it comes to 'social media' the spambot-spambot conversations are, with few exceptions, the most intelligent ones.... 
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I suspect within a decade the spambots here will have whole conversations with each other.
In this country, we call that Parliament.
|
|
|
|
|
In America, we call it Congress.
__________________
Lord, grant me the serenity to accept that there are some things I just can’t keep up with, the determination to keep up with the things I must keep up with, and the wisdom to find a good RSS feed from someone who keeps up with what I’d like to, but just don’t have the damn bandwidth to handle right now.
© 2009, Rex Hammock
|
|
|
|
|
If "con" is the opposite of "pro" then Congress is the opposite of Progress.
Kelly Herald
Software Developer
|
|
|
|
|
All of us are spambots. You are the only human user.
|
|
|
|
|
harold aptroot wrote: All of us are spambots.
Me2.
harold aptroot wrote: You are the only human user.
I am not sure.
|
|
|
|
|
The person who developed The Simulation should have known that.
|
|
|
|
|
Is a feature, not a bug. "Works as designed."
|
|
|
|
|
You know there's a whole lot of AI/ML going on behind those bots?
If it offered you a language basics crash course you probably need it (it probably saw your single line if-statements) 
|
|
|
|
|
It/they actually told me I didn't need semicolons at the end of my lines.
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Heresy! *grabs torches and pitchforks*
|
|
|
|
|
Some JavaScript lines do not need semicolons. Maybe it thought your C++ was JavaScript? Needs to crunch some more languages whether human or AI.
|
|
|
|
|
englebart wrote: Some JavaScript lines do not need semicolons.
Just because they don't doesn't mean you shouldn't
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: I suspect within a decade the spambots here will have whole conversations with each other
That'd be awesome. That means we could send them off to their own forum we could ignore and they could keep themselves busy.
Can we take that model and extend that to the whole internet?
(although I suppose this is what Facebook is doing today - I have all their properties blocked in Pi-Hole, and I remain blissfully ignorant of anything that's going on there...)
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
