|
Quote: OVHcloud data centers engulfed in flames
OVHcloud data centers engulfed in flames[^]
I like this statement: Quote: Impacted clients have been urged to turn to backups to minimize downtime and disruption.
What if the cloud was your backup?
And:
Quote: "Firefighters continue to cool the buildings with the water,"
I hope those servers can swim! 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
modified 10-Mar-21 18:16pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Eek! The cloud is turning into a cloud...
Backup your cloud data to... somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
|
I have a deep seated mistrust in anything to do with the cloud. Nothing of any importance is stored there! 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
I with you, I like to keep a copy of what is current on my local PC. That way if something breaks (yes I'm looking at you TeamCenter!) you can carry on. For backups OneDive, cloud is good but anything else is a bit dodgy in my opinon.
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to my paranoia. Our corporate IT department intensely dislikes the fact that I control three servers that are on the company domain, yet not under their administration. The three machines back up to each other, in addition to an external hard drive.
Our group has never had a critical data loss in the last 20 years. We have never had a malware incursion in that same time. The same cannot be said of corporate IT.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I live just a bunch of km away from this data center. Interestingly, the fire extinguishing system was made with water sprinklers, instead of inert gas or ... water clouds, that would have far less damaged the servers. I guess the firemen damaged more than the fire itself.
|
|
|
|
|
Rage wrote: instead of inert gas
The BOFH has brought disrepute on the use of Halon for extinguishing fires... 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
You can still use other gases to extinguish fire
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The BOFH - the Bastard Operator From Hell
(Not an official organization of any type...)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
I was answering the Halon bit  
but thanks for clarification... I didn't know what BOFH meant 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: The BOFH has brought disrepute on the use of Halon for extinguishing fires...
OTOH he's greatly developed the use of Halon for extinguishing management and sales.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Impacted clients have been urged to turn to backups to minimize downtime and disruption.
On Firebase[^] of course!
|
|
|
|
|
Cp-Coder wrote: What if the cloud was your backup?
As long as you haven't lost your live system, then you can still do a new backup
The problem comes when your live system and your backup were in the cloud... then you are probably screwed
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
How was it in the JSOP's thread the other day about the "I told you so"?  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've been building a tiny graphics library for IoT devices to supplant Adafruit's offering which is huge, especially if you want jpeg loading support, and I think might be tied to the Arduino framework.
I've been working on JPEG decompression all morning with the idea that I would take a std::istream and a std::ostream in jpeg::convert(). (There is no load() function because there's no memory for that on these devices)
Come to find out, JPEG decompression returns a series of rectangles - i'm not sure of the dispersal/locality of them yet - but I can't produce for example, a 16-bit color depth bitmap stream (which expects pixels left to right, top to bottom) with something that takes rectangles without allocating enough memory (depending on the locality) to hold much, if not all of the buffer.
*headdesk*
*headdesk*
*headdesk*
I've already got 80% of it implemented and I'm asking myself how I got that far without realizing this fairly obvious problem.
 
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
Read the title and I thought you actually shot your foot off.
Glad you are alright. 
|
|
|
|
|
FWIW, that's a side-effect of how the image is processed. It isn't scanned left-to-right, top-to-bottom. It is scanned in a diagonal traversal pattern and that results in the rectangular sections that you saw. That scanning pattern results in better compression of the data than plain, old, horizontal or vertical scanning.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, and since I was adapting the decompression algorithm from some other code, I should have put two and two together well before I did, hence my frustration.
Real programmers use butterflies
|
|
|
|
|
But not your deputy 
modified 5-Apr-21 21:01pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it's any consolation, a couple of years ago I spent days designing a C# system that was so elegant and beautiful it would have been a doddle to implement and update.
Only to remember that for very good reasons you can't override static functions and the whole damn thing was a pile of cr*p. 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: you can't override static functions
Damn! Didn't occur to me. Must remember that! 
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't the design work if you simply made the functions non-static so that you could override them?
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
