The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.
Tern still makes embedded controllers running 186 to 486 compatible chips. so there's still manufactures building with those chips. I worked with one of their 286 boards a couple years back, it was a lot of fun writing SPI and 2-wire code to communicate with the various other chips on the board.
Haven't touched assembly in years, for now c, is good enough in what i'm doing.
The virtual DOS support in the 386 was, inadvertently, one of the worst things to ever happen. Because of that, Microsoft bailed out of OS/2, and went back to making money on DOS and started Windows 1.0 on top of DOS, and the rest is history.
Without that, OS/2 would have likely stuck and we'd have a vastly more sane environment to work in today. OS/2 threw out the Win32 API and created a completely new one that was consistent, and actually designed, not excrementally grown.
That's not exactly what happened. Windows 1.0 was quite a while before OS/2. A dispute over Windows 3.1 was what led to discontinuing joint development on OS/2. Microsoft took that API and developed NT with it and the end result was still very, very similar to OS/2 . In fact, the older documentation of the Win32 API would note compatibility with OS/2 for the various functions.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
They were about 2 years apart, but that's initial release, not when planning and work started on them. Anyhoo, the bottom line is that once it became possible to 'multi-task' DOS applications, OS/2 was pretty much doomed because Microsoft could continue to milk that cow instead of forcing the adoption of a new standard. Obviously forcing a new standard is hard, but we'd have all been far better off for it.
As to the compatibility there isn't much that I can see. The OS/2 API was extremely consistent in terms of naming and parameters and such. The Win32 API was basically a hacked up version of the previous Windows APIs. Win32 is a mess in comparison to the OS/2 interfaces.
IBM took OS/2 on to the 32 bit form and it was nice, though of course back then it took like 25 floppy disks to install or some such.
A lot of science fiction and non-fiction discussions concern the next evolution of mankind. The Nazis and other villainous organisations tried to force it forward through misguided selective breeding programs or gene manipulation or whatever.
For example: I just recently watched a movie called I Am Mother (2019) - IMDb[^] wherein *** Warning! Spoilers ahead *** a robot AI decides to kill off all humanity to breed and train a better human race from selected embryos.
All these incidences seem to only ever allow for one type of human as the "future of mankind" except one I have come across. In H.G. Wells' excellent book The Time Machine - Wikipedia[^] and for those illiterate enough to need it, the movies: The Time Machine (1960) - IMDb[^] and The Time Machine (2002) - IMDb[^], the latter having flashier effects but less close to the book, IMHO. In these *** Warning! Spoilers ahead *** there are two "future human" types, the "Morlocks" and the "Eloi".
My question is, given the appropriate circumstances, which do you think you would most likely become, or what other human "evolutions" do you think are actually possible?
Personally, I, or my descendents, would expect to and up as a Morlock as I would hopefully be in the underground bunker come the nuclear apocalypse.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
I watched it this weekend as well. That was a pretty good movie.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013