The Lounge is rated Safe For Work. If you're about to post something inappropriate for a shared office environment, then don't post it. No ads, no abuse, and no programming questions. Trolling, (political, climate, religious or whatever) will result in your account being removed.
I've got a practice padlock and a practice door lock, and I can do the padlock pretty quickly, the door lock takes a bit longer. I've also got a practice disk detainer padlock that I can open in seconds (it's so badly made it opens with a tension lever or even a spoon handle...)
I've also got a real Euro "double sided" lock that was the one in the back door until I changed it for a "thumb inside" version, and I've picked that twice. Can I get it the third time? Nope!
I think it's a case of getting the "feel" of the lock right, and I'm still trying too hard I think.
But LPL and BL do make it look so easy!
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640 Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
I don't fan!
To answer your question, no. I just wanted to find a different approach to the theme to make it a bit more interesting: I knew from elementary Math classes there are relations in sets so I googled for it. Probably ended up making it a tad more difficult, so I added the hint.
Does anyone else use the JD Edwards E1 Timesheet system? I ask as it a constant pain in in the rear end. The user interface appears to Java, programmed by either an intern or someone who was a programmer by reading 'Java For Dummies' or similar. The worst thing was I googled it and found a web site for them? claiming awards, the Dilbert of the Day calendar for today (8-17-16) seems appropriate!
We use deltek, which sucks hairy donkey testicles.
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
But what I'd really like is reference where each element has a description of permitted attributes and styles. I mean, really, if I were writing a rendering engine (which I'm not) where is the gospel of what's permissible as an element's styles and how all these styles behave?
Actually, W3Schools has done a great job of making an interactive UI -- click on one of the style definitions, like "display", and you can see all the options and even how they behave. Still, I don't want to be clicking everywhere. Isn't there an actual document somewhere?
In my insufficient google-fu, I stumbled across something interesting but unrelated:
Start here: HTML 5.2: 3. Semantics, structure, and APIs of HTML documents[^]
The current spec has anchors to elements that an element inherits from so it's easier to search and browse in the page rather than in a search engine. It's not really authoritative though because browser and web developers do whatever they want, and that eventually gets reflected in the spec.
I don't know if there's anything quite as helpful for CSS rules, as far as I understand it there's some basic rules about defaults (block vs inline elements for example), but mostly that's decided by browsers.
CSS is much bigger, but I think you'd start here: CSS Snapshot 2018[^] (Links to all of the pages that I think you actually want)
Once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny, consume you it will.