|
Style reminds me a lot like Clapton and Delbert McClinton
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer is finally available for download.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Clapton was a big fan of JJ Cale, and they even made some records together.
Quote: The two finally met in the late '70s following a Cale show in London, when Clapton introduced himself backstage. "He was very, very polite and friendly. He showed me a guitar he had rebuilt. I said, 'That's fantastic,' and he said, 'This is a piece of (garbage).
|
|
|
|
|
Clapton has been a favorite o9f mine over the years.
Have had the luck to see him in concert twice and he puts on a good show.
PartsBin an Electronics Part Organizer is finally available for download.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Turns out the payer's paler paper pager said nothing about a parer yesterday.
|
|
|
|
|
And a right git it was too ... 
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Did the pacer's say anything?
// TODO: Insert something here Top ten reasons why I'm lazy
1.
|
|
|
|
|
No, but his pater did ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
And the paver? Did they weigh in?
To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.
|
|
|
|
|
Just a bunch of pikers we all are.
|
|
|
|
|
Guess I was playing Poker
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
If they did, that would be RARER,!
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday I upgraded Windows 11 to build 22621 (currently only available to insiders). Everything seems fine, with one nice surprise: When I checked the free space on the systems drive, I had 5 GB more free space! Of course this was after I got rid of the old Windows backup files. I have Macrium systems images of the old installation, if I ever want to go back.
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
modified 17-Sep-22 7:10am.
|
|
|
|
|
See, deleting random user files does add up...
|
|
|
|
|
|
That's really well done! Thanks for the link.
|
|
|
|
|
it's not an either/or, it's both. Top down gives one a goal. Bottom up gives one flexibility to revise a top. Just saying. Clever video.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
That works great in software but not in economics. 
|
|
|
|
|
Does work with software, but I submit the US economy (and to some degree Canada) sort of works the same way just in very complicated slow motion (decades). I know you are going to disagree, but I still hold that opinion.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
The vid is about monetary policy; and it is not smart, as it implies a choice. We do not have one
Simple explanation. You own a lemonade stand, in the current economy, you need to grow with at least 2% each year;
So you grow bigger lemons. Sweeter lemons. Add more water. But at a certain point, you will reach a max, simply due to the amount of people passing. If that happens with our real economy, things collapse. If the economy collapses, war follows.
I'm not taking arms for some fools failing economic policy. The world is drowning in money, and now I should go to war to protect some characters in a database?
"We, the people", we had enough.
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: So you grow bigger lemons. Sweeter lemons. Add more water. But at a certain point, you will reach a max, simply due to the amount of people passing.
So you expand to another neighbourhood - buy up another lemonade stand there, hire workers, etc.
Eddy Vluggen wrote: If that happens with our real economy, things collapse. If the economy collapses, war follows.
Not necessarily. Lack of growth does not equal economic collapse. For that matter, neither does shrinking ("recession").
Most Western countries have stable or declining populations, so population pressure is no longer a reason for growing the economy.
The major reason why economies must grow is to pay for the over-spending of governments. As almost every government on the planet spends more than it collects in taxes, it must do one of two things: print money, which causes inflation, lessening the governmental debt as a proportion of GDP, or have the economy grow, again lessening the governmental debt as a proportion of GDP.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: So you expand to another neighbourhood - buy up another lemonade stand there, hire workers, etc.
That's what the US is trying. By force. And even if they take the planet, it is limited, innit? 
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: Not necessarily. Lack of growth does not equal economic collapse
Usually it doesn't; but paying existing debts requires the growth.
It is not some economic theory.
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: so population pressure is no longer a reason for growing the economy.
Which population pressure? The complete West would fold over without refugees to enter our workforce! The only pressure here is called interest.
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: print money, which causes inflation
IT DIDN'T!!
It is just numbers on a computer sitting there; if it were real cash, then yes, you'd have a shitload of inflation after we "rescued" the banks. It didn't, even though trillions more slosh through the system.
There's no inflation! You pay more for yer shite, yes, but that's not inflation, that's just price going up.
Lessening debt?
You do realize that money is never coming back ehr? By now that is obvious for anyone who can count.
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: lessening the governmental debt
Bastard Programmer from Hell 
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: That's what the US is trying. By force.
Not only the USA... almost every country with some strength tries it. Even Holand (you had colonies too, hadn't you?)
BTW, today I would say China is way more aggressive with the economical expansion than USA.
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Even Holand (you had colonies too, hadn't you?)
If you wrote it correct, then the name would still be wrong. And we do have colonies that we keep funding, not vassals.
Nelek wrote: BTW, today I would say China is way more aggressive with the economical expansion than USA.
China? Aggressive?
There's a US military base not far from here; to protect "the Netherlands" from the evil commies and Germans. Just like you protect American oil wells in the mid-east.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I said "economical expansion" not militar.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
To some, that's the same thing. It's a rather large part of that economy, innit? To invade and conquer? Largest budget to warfare?
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
