The Lounge is rated PG. If you're about to post something you wouldn't want your
kid sister to read then don't post it. No flame wars, no abusive conduct, no programming
questions and please don't post ads.
I was hoping more along the lines of only some insignificant percentage believing it (and of the course the rest pretending to believe, out of fear). There is of course also the possibility that none of them believe it, and instead they think we're the ones who will believe it and think that they are something special.
God, another mouth to feed. I'm surprised they manage to breed (the expectant father looks like Tim-Nice_But-Dim in the Torygraph). On the up-side he married out, so there us every chance this one will not have webbed feet or six toes.
I'd thought she was up the spout a few months back when they were in the Phillipines and she wasn't drinking alcohol, but this can't be the same pregnancy.
The Reincarnation wrote:
When does morning sickness warrant a few days in Hospital?
To be fair, what she has can get pretty hairy[^] but to be even more fair, I doubt being married to the heir to the throne has counted against here.
The Reincarnation wrote:
I wonder which mugs will be picking up the bill for this?
"I controlled my laughter and simple said "No,I am very busy,so I can't write any code for you". The moment they heard this all the smiling face turned into a sad looking face and one of them farted. So I had to leave the place as soon as possible." - Mr.Prakash One Fine Saturday. 24/04/2004
That's one thing you can't blame them (the Royal Family) for. The press should get off its collective ass and look for more newsworthy material.
The Duchess of Cambridge, the former Kate Middleton, is understood to have found out last month that she was pregnant, and had not intended to go public with the news until she was at least 12 weeks pregnant.
So they can't even respect her privacy? Oh I forgot, they already published candid photos of her, they've got no idea what the word means.
.....to find out who the real contributors are. Basically the Hamsters are finding out who still contributes when not motivated by points and those who do are going to be rewarded with money and the latest gadgets.
(I waited three threads before bringing it back to Rep Points again. )
....to find out who the real contributors are. Basically the Hamsters are finding out who still contributes when not motivated by points and those who do are going to be rewarded with money and the latest gadgets.
Your logic is quite flawed. Why would they reward those who contribute anyways?
While it may seem wrong to you, from an economic standpoint it would be more likely that those that do not contribute unless rewarded would reap rewards in the hopes that they will contribute more.
Computers have been intelligent for a long time now. It just so happens that the program writers are about as effective as a room full of monkeys trying to crank out a copy of Hamlet.
Last Visit: 31-Dec-99 18:00 Last Update: 26-May-17 21:12