The Lounge is rated PG. If you're about to post something you wouldn't want your
kid sister to read then don't post it. No flame wars, no abusive conduct, no programming
questions and please don't post ads.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
My email service provider decided that patching their servers because of spectre and meltdown in the middle of the morning is a great idea. I've been unable to access my email for nearly 2 hours and they are not responding to support requests other than to tell me it's all done and fixed! NO IT ELEPHANTING ISNT!!!
Keep your friends close. Keep Kill your enemies closer.
Do you have any articles about the real and juggernaut Jewish influence on US elections and policy or just short, pithless articles that make unsubstantiated and unverifiable claims against the Russians?
What you posted was unsubstantiated and unverifiable rubbish. To call it 'newsworthy' is an example of uncritical thinking and passive acceptance. We would all be better served if you contrasted that feeble excuse of a 'newsworthy' article with something something like this. The difference between these two articles is immense and reflect just how devoid in facts and analysis the 'item' you referenced is.
To retort with false and feigned claim of antisemitism is a deceptive and misleading tactic. It is designed to terminate all discussion and redirect attention from the irrefutable fact of real and significant Jewish influence in US elections and policy. We would be better served if you attempted to refute this fact instead of parroting a worn out political tactic. For example read this article and then think long and hard before responding again with another feeble cry of antisemitism.
Again, you appear unprepared, unwilling or unable to offer anything in the way of a credible response.
If you post unsubstantiated and unverifiable information, with no attempt on your part to be objectively critical of that information, then you should expect to be challenged on it.
You are blindly willing to accept unsubstantiated news items that, until proven otherwise, really constitute nothing more than propaganda against Russia. You are also blindly willing to ignore the real and pervasive Jewish influence in US policy. Why is this?
I do not make any statements that I am not prepared to support with well researched references. So here is a challenge for you. If you can prove your point that the statements I have made and information I have provided is antisemitic then I will agree to stop posting any and all comments at CodeProject. This is your chance to make certain I never post another comment at CodeProject. Will you have this exchange with me?
[Edit] If we have this exchange then we will let Chris decide if I have violated the terms of agreement at CP. If he decides in your favor then I will stop posting comments at CP.
Since you haven't bothered to even try to substantiate your asinine claims with a link, the onus is upon you to back your statements with verifiable sources, not on Cornelius. He/she at least provided a link to a source; you haven't responded in kind. If you intend to engage in a battle of wits, I would advise you to bring some ammunition; you don't appear to have any.
By the way, in case you missed the memo, the Lounge does not allow political debates; we have a Soapbox forum for that, and I suggest that you spend more time there.