.NET (Core and Framework)

Santiago Perez25-Jun-07 8:32

25-Jun-07 8:32

With this scenario I would have to cast property Personnel_List everytime I need to get a property value from one of the derived objects. Doesn't this defeat the purpose of Generics? I guess I'm trying find the most efficient and scalable way to do this.

I tried a different approach as follows. I can't seem to find a way to have the Base class properties populated without having to re-wite the property assignment code in the derived classes.
Anyone encountered this before?

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;

namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
B objB = new B();
List oBList = new List();
objB.GenerateList(ref oBList);

}
}

public interface iClass
{
string Full_Name
{
get;
set;
}

string Short_Name
{
get;
set;
}
}

public class A : iClass
{
private string _PhoneA = "";
private string _Full_Name = "";
private string _Short_Name = "";

public string PhoneA
{
get { return _PhoneA; }
set { _PhoneA = value; }
}

public string Full_Name
{
get { return _Full_Name; }
set { _Full_Name = value; }
}
public string Short_Name
{
get { return _Short_Name; }
set { _Short_Name = value; }
}

public virtual void GenerateList(ref List List)
{
A objA = new A();
objA.Full_Name = "Tom";
List.Add(objA);

objA = new A();
objA.Full_Name = "Bob";
List.Add(objA);

objA = new A();
objA.Full_Name = "Gerry";
List.Add(objA);

}

}

class B : A, iClass
{
private string _SSN = "";

public string SSN
{
get { return _SSN; }
set { _SSN = value; }
}

public new void GenerateList(ref List List)
{
base.GenerateList(ref List);

foreach (B oB in List)
{
oB.SSN = "123";
}

}
}
}

Andy L 226-Jun-07 0:16

Andy L 2

26-Jun-07 0:16

Maybe I am missing the point somewhere but I cannot see why you need to use generics to do this.

In my previous example by placing all the initialisation properties into iPerson for example would enable you to initialise all classes derived from iPerson i.e.

// Interface that defines properties and methods to be called during initilaisation
public interface I
{
string Prop1 { get; set; }
int Prop2 { get; set; }
void Initialise(params object[] arrParams);
}

// Classes to be initialised
class A: I
{
private string _prop1 = null;
private int _prop2;

// Interface implementations
string I.Prop1
{
get { return _prop1; }
set { _prop1 = value; }
}

int I.Prop2
{
get { return _prop2; }
set { _prop2 = value; }
}

void I.Initialise(params object[] arrParams)
{
// Do some initialisation on params
Initialise(arrParams);
}

// Option for in class initialisation - could use virtual.
protected abstract void Initialise(params object[] arrParams);
}

class B: A
{
protected override void Initialise(params object[] arrParams)
{
}
}

class C: B
{
private string Prop3 = null;

protected override void Initialise(params object[] arrParams)
{
}
}

Now using interface I to initialise instances of A, B or C as follows:
//Create list
List<I> items = new List<I>();

// This could equally be:
// ArrayList items = new ArrayList();
....
if (ClassType == eType.A)
{
items.Add(new A());
}
else if (ClassType == eType.B)
{
items.Add(new B());
}
else if (ClassType == eType.C)
{
items.Add(new C());
}

// Initialisation can be performed on object instances of type A, B and C this way using interface I no casting required.
foreach (I item in items)
{
// Initialise object properties
item.Prop1 = source.P1;
item.Prop2 = source.P2;

//Or even call an initialise method on the object itself.
item.Initialise(source.P1, source.P2, "P3");
}

This example relies on a single interface structure defined at compile time, this is also a requirement that applies to generics - if what you are looking for is to try and initialise objects by examining their structures at run-time then this falls into the realms of Reflection - and only do this if for some reason you really need to.

If you are requiring to initialise properties that apply to the derived classes (i.e class C)
you could used the Initialise() method shown but you would have to either apply strict parameter ordering or employ a mechanism for identifying which parameter goes to which property.

Santiago Perez26-Jun-07 16:41

26-Jun-07 16:41

Sorry man, you went out to left field and away from the topic at hand. Thanks for your help anyway.

Santiago Perez26-Jun-07 18:28

26-Jun-07 18:28

Ok, I apologize again. Just having a frustrating day. I think I follow what you were trying to explain. I've also watched the webcast from Juval Lowy. What I was trying to explain in my previous post is that I got my function (not a method) to return a generic list of an interface that all my classes implement. What I don't quite understand is how I use this list in the referencing call if I'm expecting a List of of a specific type that implements that interface. Basically it looks to me like I have to iterate throuh the list and cast each object to my desired type in order to get the intelisense etc. Are you saying that I should have my function call look like this based on my last example? If so this won't compile because I get the following error on each result.Add()

Error 1 The best overloaded method match for 'System.Collections.Generic.List<t>.Add(T)' has some invalid arguments C:\Projects\ConsoleApplication1\ConsoleApplication1\Program.cs 95 17 ConsoleApplication1
Error 2 Argument '1': cannot convert from 'ConsoleApplication1.A' to 'T' C:\Projects\ConsoleApplication1\ConsoleApplication1\Program.cs 95 28 ConsoleApplication1

public static List<t> GetList<t>() where T : A,iClass
{
List<t> result = new List<t>();
iClass oC = null;
if (typeof(T) == typeof(A))
{
oC = new A();
((A)oC).Full_Name = "A_Tom";
result.Add((A)oC);

oC = new A();
((A)oC).Full_Name = "A_Bill";
result.Add((A)oC);

oC = new A();
((A)oC).Full_Name = "A_Jack";
result.Add((A)oC);

}
else if (typeof(T) == typeof(B))
{
oC = new B();
((B)oC).Full_Name = "b_Tom";
result.Add((B)oC);

oC = new B();
((B)oC).Full_Name = "B_Bill";
result.Add((B)oC);

oC = new B();
((B)oC).Full_Name = "B_Jack";
result.Add((B)oC);
}
return result;
}

Santiago Perez26-Jun-07 20:19

26-Jun-07 20:19

I got it , I got it, I got it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

f
public static List<t> GetList<t>() where T :B, iClass, new()
{
T obj = new T();
List<t> result = new List<t>();

if (typeof(T) == typeof(A))
{

((A)obj).PhoneA = "444-4444";
result.Add(obj);
}
else if (typeof(T) == typeof(B))
{
((B)obj).SSN = "123-12-1111";
result.Add(obj);
}

return result;
}

Andy L 226-Jun-07 22:37

Andy L 2

26-Jun-07 22:37

You are still having to cast classes A and B though???? Confused | :confused:

Santiago Perez27-Jun-07 5:05

27-Jun-07 5:05

Here's my thing that I don't understand about what you presented earlier, you say to use the Initialise method of the Interface on each individual Derrived class to initilise that instance. My problem with this sample is that you're using an array of type object[] which in itself will do implicit cast on each item thus degrading performance. Secondly you're example of

//Or even call an initialise method on the object itself.
item.Initialise(source.P1, source.P2, "P3");
}

tells me that you will need to write an Initialisation override on each generation of the object, in this case to be able to handle "P3". I guess if it's a virtual you could call base.Initialise and pass it the same params. WOuld that be way to go?

Santiago Perez27-Jun-07 5:29

27-Jun-07 5:29

I got it, I got it, I got it.........Again! I found an elegant solution I think. A light bulb is starting shine!!!! Tell what you think about this solution. THis will allow me to use a static function. WOuld it be better to use an instance virtual function and have each derrived instance call the base.function instead?:

namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
B objB = new B();
List<iclass> oBList = new List<iclass>();
List oList = A.GetList();
}
}

public interface iClass
{
string Full_Name
{
get;
set;
}
string Short_Name
{
get;
set;
}
}

public class A : iClass
{
public A()
{
}
private string _PhoneA = "";
private string _Full_Name = "";
private string _Short_Name = "";
public string PhoneA
{
get { return _PhoneA; }
set { _PhoneA = value; }
}

public static List<t> GetList<t>() where T : iClass, new()
{
T obj = new T();
List<t> result = new List<t>();
obj.Full_Name = "Susan";
obj.Short_Name = "Su";

if (typeof(T) == typeof(A))
{

(obj as A).PhoneA = "444-4444";
result.Add(obj);
}
else if (typeof(T) == typeof(B))
{
(obj as B).SSN = "123-12-1111";
result.Add(obj);
}
return result;

}

public string Full_Name
{
get { return _Full_Name; }
set { _Full_Name = value; }
}
public string Short_Name
{
get { return _Short_Name; }
set { _Short_Name = value; }
}

}

public class B : A, iClass
{
private string _SSN = "";
public string SSN
{
get { return _SSN; }
set { _SSN = value; }
}
}

}

Santiago Perez27-Jun-07 5:45

27-Jun-07 5:45

It works both ways!!! Generics is incredible!! It changes the whole game.
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;

namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
B objB = new B();
List<iclass> oBList = new List<iclass>();
List oList = A.GetList ();

List BList = new List();
objB.GetThisList(ref BList);
}

void GetNames()
{
Collection OBC = new Collection();
OBC.Add(new B());
}
}

public interface iClass
{
string Full_Name
{
get;
set;
}
string Short_Name
{
get;
set;
}
}

public class A : iClass
{
public A()
{
}
private string _PhoneA = "";
private string _Full_Name = "";
private string _Short_Name = "";
public string PhoneA
{
get { return _PhoneA; }
set { _PhoneA = value; }
}
public static void DoSomethingtoObject(iClass obj)
{
A objA = (A)obj;
objA.Full_Name = "Tom";
}
public static List<t> GetList<t>() where T : iClass, new()
{
T obj = new T();
List<t> result = new List<t>();
obj.Full_Name = "Susan";
obj.Short_Name = "Su";

if (typeof(T) == typeof(A))
{
(obj as A).PhoneA = "444-4444";
result.Add(obj);
}
else if (typeof(T) == typeof(B))
{
(obj as B).SSN = "123-12-1111";
result.Add(obj);
}
return result;

}

public virtual void GetThisList<t>(ref List<t> List) where T : iClass, new()
{
T objA = new T();
objA.Full_Name = "Mary J";
(objA as A).PhoneA = "123456";
List.Add(objA);
}

public string Full_Name
{
get { return _Full_Name; }
set { _Full_Name = value; }
}
public string Short_Name
{
get { return _Short_Name; }
set { _Short_Name = value; }
}

}

public class B : A, iClass
{
private string _SSN = "";
public string SSN
{
get { return _SSN; }
set { _SSN = value; }
}

public override void GetThisList<t>(ref List<t> List)
{
base.GetThisList<t>(ref List);
(List[0] as B).SSN = "123-11-1111";
}

}

}

Santiago Perez28-Jun-07 7:34

28-Jun-07 7:34

I found the solution I was looking for, thanks for your guidance Andy.
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using Wintellect.PowerCollections;
using System.Collections.Specialized;
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
B objB = new B();
List<iclass> oBList = new List<iclass>();

List oList = A.GetList (); //Static function that evaluate typeof(T)
List BList = new List();
objB.GetThisList(ref BList); //Uses inheritance to call base.GetTHisList<>
}

public interface iClass
{
string Full_Name
{
get;
set;
}
string Short_Name
{
get;
set;
}
}

public class A : iClass
{
public A()
{
}
private string _PhoneA = "";
private string _Full_Name = "";
private string _Short_Name = "";
public string PhoneA
{
get { return _PhoneA; }
set { _PhoneA = value; }
}
public static void DoSomethingtoObject(iClass obj)
{
A objA = (A)obj;
objA.Full_Name = "Tom";
}
public static List<t> GetList<t>() where T : iClass, new()
{
T obj = new T();
List<t> result = new List<t>();
obj.Full_Name = "Susan";
obj.Short_Name = "Su";

if (typeof(T) == typeof(A))
{
(obj as A).PhoneA = "444-4444";
result.Add(obj);
}
else if (typeof(T) == typeof(B))
{
(obj as B).SSN = "123-12-1111";
result.Add(obj);
}
return result;

}

public virtual void GetThisList<t>(ref List<t> List) where T : iClass, new()
{
T objA = new T();
objA.Full_Name = "Mary J";
(objA as A).PhoneA = "123456";
List.Add(objA);
}

public string Full_Name
{
get { return _Full_Name; }
set { _Full_Name = value; }
}
public string Short_Name
{
get { return _Short_Name; }
set { _Short_Name = value; }
}

}

public class B : A, iClass
{
private string _SSN = "";
public string SSN
{
get { return _SSN; }
set { _SSN = value; }
}

public override void GetThisList<t>(ref List<t> List)
{
base.GetThisList<t>(ref List);
(List[0] as B).SSN = "123-11-1111";
}

}

}

Regards,
Santiago "Saint" Perez
Florida's Turnpike Enterprise Santiago.perez@dot.state.fl.us

Andy L 229-Jun-07 5:33

Andy L 2

29-Jun-07 5:33

I am glad to have helped although you did most of it yourself.

Andy

XML 3 BulkLoad Error

Panchal Hardik25-Jun-07 2:25

Panchal Hardik

25-Jun-07 2:25

I have following error in window service same code is working in window Application

"QueryInterface for interface SQLXMLBULKLOADLib.ISQLXMLBulkLoad failed."
Dim objbl As SQLXMLBulkLoad3
objbl = New SQLXMLBulkLoad3
objbl.ConnectionString = "Provider=SQLOLEDB.1;Data Source=pcDB;Initial Catalog=webdb;User ID=sa;pwd=sa"
objbl.ErrorLogFile = "c:\error.log"
objbl.BulkLoad = True
objbl.KeepIdentity = False
objbl.CheckConstraints = False
objbl.Transaction = False
objbl.Execute("c:\Items.XSD", "C:\Items.xml")

Thanks

Hardik Panchal

Re: XML 3 BulkLoad Error

Dave Kreskowiak25-Jun-07 4:04

25-Jun-07 4:04

Don't cross post in multiple forums. It's considered very rude to "spam" the forums and makes it quite difficult for multiple people to collaborate on an answer.

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]

Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP
Visual Developer - Visual Basic
2006, 2007

installation .net 2005

Sumanth Pereji25-Jun-07 2:19

Sumanth Pereji

25-Jun-07 2:19

hi all,

installation failed when i tried to install .net 2005 on windows 2003 server with sp1

Any one please help me

thanks and regards
sumanth

this is sumanth, completed m.c.a from india.

Dave Kreskowiak25-Jun-07 4:09

25-Jun-07 4:09

Would you care to tell us what the error message is?? Or should we just guess at the 1,000 or so possible causes for failure...

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]

Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP
Visual Developer - Visual Basic
2006, 2007

Pete O'Hanlon25-Jun-07 5:13

Pete O'Hanlon

25-Jun-07 5:13

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
Or should we just guess at the 1,000 or so possible causes for failure...

I suspect that it's a PEBKAC failure.

Please visit http://www.readytogiveup.com/ and do something special today.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

Dave Kreskowiak25-Jun-07 5:56

25-Jun-07 5:56

Pete O`Hanlon wrote:
I suspect that it's a PEBKAC failure.

I had to Google that one! Laugh | :laugh:

I normally call it a short between the keyboard and ground.

A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]

Dave Kreskowiak
Microsoft MVP
Visual Developer - Visual Basic
2006, 2007

Pete O'Hanlon25-Jun-07 8:32

Pete O'Hanlon

25-Jun-07 8:32

Dave Kreskowiak wrote:
I normally call it a short between the keyboard and ground

I like that.

Please visit http://www.readytogiveup.com/ and do something special today.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

Getting a the real object from it's handle

originSH25-Jun-07 23:03

originSH

25-Jun-07 23:03

I normally use EBKAC or an ID10T error, but that one only really works when you say it (ID ten T).

Shyam K Pananghat24-Jun-07 20:24

Shyam K Pananghat

24-Jun-07 20:24

Hi,

I am having the handle to a combo box's dropdown list control which i have grabed by subclassing and overriding the "WNDProc" to receive window message. is there any way by which i can know what is the real object behind this handle.So if it is list control can i assign it to a .Net list control and start using that list control in .Net. i tried control.FromHandle.. Listbox.Fromhandle and and some methods inside the marshal class in .Net

so can you please help me getting the real control behind this handle

Shyam
my blog dotnetscoups.blogspot.com .

swthoughts.blogspot.com .

Re: Getting a the real object from it's handle

Dave Kreskowiak25-Jun-07 4:07