|
N a v a n e e t h wrote: This is absurd. Why do you want to assign a signed value to unsigned type?
This is not as uncommon as you might think.
"Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown
"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
dipuks wrote: while(TRUE)
{ ..........
}
As suggested by Luc, use for ( ; ; )
dipuks wrote: if(1) { ......... }
Why would you ever want to do this?
You really do not need the condition check here.
dipuks wrote: unsigned short a = -1;
Assigning a signed number to an unsigned variable does not make sense.
You should either change the unsigned variable to a signed variable.
Or assign the value 0xFFFFFFFF to the unsigned variable.
A lot of work has been done in this field. Look at Inside SafeInt[^]
dipuks wrote: strcpy_s(&a[2], sizeof(a), b);
You may have to do strcpy_s(&a[2], sizeof(a) - 2, b);
«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.
|
|
|
|
|
these are discussable item, and to tell a long story short, there are different ways possible.
Code 1: writing loops with no "exit strategy" isnt fine
Code 2: common way to initialize with invalid data
Code 3: a[2] = 'H'; 
+ bug, buffer is false computed !!! strcpy_s(&a[2], sizeof(a) - 2, b);
+ i would use sprintf-style funktion "H%s" for extensionable coding 
Press F1 for help or google it.
Greetings from Germany
|
|
|
|
|
My title is probably not very well phrased, but here is the problem. Let's say I've got functions a(), b(), where a() calls b(), and b() calls vector<T>::iterator iter = someVector.begin().
b() needs to pass this iterator down to a() via a void* mechanism, without returning it (essentially using reference passing), so more explicitly, the two functions are:
void a(void*& param);
void b(void*& param);
The problem is, we can't simply do something like this:
vector<T>::iterator iter = someVector.begin();
param = reinterpret_cast<void*>(iter)
This is because the compiler (MSVC9) will complain about trying to cast an iterator to a void*:
error C2440: 'reinterpret_cast' : cannot convert from 'std::_Vector_iterator<_Ty,_Alloc>' to 'void *'
Likewise, I can't do something like...
vector<T>::iterator iter = someVector.begin();
param = reinterpret_cast<void*>(&iter)
...because even though this will compile, it will not work because begin() actually returns an iterator object and not a pointer to some memory location, so the memory address of that object will go out of scope (not sure when, but I'm guessing when you leave b()). So, because I can't do any of this, I thought that maybe I could do a memory copy of the iterator, pass it up as a void*, and then cast it back to an iterator, so something along these lines:
vector<T>::iterator iter = someVector.begin();
void* mem = malloc(sizeof(vector<T>::iterator));
param = mem;
And on the flip side, in order to decode my data, I'd do something like this:
vector<T>::iterator = reinterpret_cast<vector<T>::iterator>(param);
I'm wondering whether or not this idea of mine is feasible or will cause me many problems, or if there is a better way of doing what I'd like to do, given the limitations (can only pass by void* reference).
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Apart from the fact you're using malloc, the last idea's OK.
Use new instead - it's C++, man!
param = reinterpret_cast<void*>(new vector<T>::iterator(someVector.begin()));
Remember to delete it afterwards as well....
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, well, the way I see it, malloc just does a simple memory allocation, whereas new also calls the parameterless constructor. In this case, since I'm overwriting everything, I figured malloc was the better way, but from my testing, it seems that new works as well. I've managed to get some sample code working, and it seems to be fine when T = int, but I've been told that it may not work where T is a more complicated class.
|
|
|
|
|
Should be fine, no matter what T is - an iterator generally only holds a reference to an item in a container (for simple, container iterators).
Cyrilix wrote: new also calls the parameterless constructor
new will call whichever constructor you specify. In my example, I use teh copy constructor.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
In any recent version of VC, iterators are not simple pointers. There is some debug info kept around to detect dangling iterators and iterators that point outside of their containers. So doing a straight memcpy will work only as long as the original iterator exists.
What about this:
vector<T>::iterator* piter = new vector<T>::iterator ( someVector.begin() );
void* pv = (void*) piter;</T></T> ?
Last modified: 5hrs 10mins after originally posted -- fixde tpyo
--Mike--
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any function which can transfer date time string to SYSTEMTIME?
the string may be, such as, "2009-06-21 3:12:13" or "2009-06-21".
|
|
|
|
|
|
No single WIndows function, but VarDateFromStr[^] followed by VariantTimeToSystemTime[^]. That will use the date/time format(s) defined by your current locale.
Alternatively,
SYSTEMTIME st;
sscanf("2009-06-21 3:12:13", "%4d-%2d-%2d %d:%d:%d", &sy.wYear, &st.wMonth, &st.wDay, &st.wHour, &st.wMinute, &st.wSecond);
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
I need help with the GDI-function Alphablend() on Vista. Here's my code:
hMemDC:=CreateCompatibleDC(hdc)
hbitmap:=CreatecompatibleBitmap(hdc,width,height)
...
blendfunc.BlendOp=0
blendfunc.BlendFlags=0
blendfunc.SourceConstantAlpha=128
blendfunc.AlphaFormat=0
AlphaBlend(hdc,siPX,siPY,width,Height,hMemDC,0,0,Width,Height,@blendfunc))
//StretchBlt(hdc,siPX,siPY,Width,Height,hMemDC,0,0,Width,Height,SRCCOPY)
//BitBlt(hdc,siPX,siPY,Width,Height,hMemDC,0,0,SRCCOPY)
When i use StretchBlt() or Bitblt() it works OK, so coordinates are ok. My language is not C so @blendfunc seams wrong but im sure it is not (it means 'pointer to a structure'). I suspect AlphaBlend does not work (returns false) because my bitmap has no alpha-channel. Saw on the MS-website an example that uses CreateDibSection() to create a 32-bit bitmap but that doesn't work also.
It goes like this:
hMemDC:=CreateCompatibleDC(hdc)
memclear(@bmi,_sizeof(_winBITMAPINFO))
bmi.bmiHeader.biSize:=_sizeof(_winBITMAPINFOHEADER)
bmi.bmiHeader.biWidth:=width
bmi.bmiHeader.biHeight:=height
bmi.bmiHeader.biPlanes:=1
bmi.bmiHeader.biBitCount:=32
bmi.bmiHeader.biCompression:=BI_RGB
bmi.bmiHeader.biSizeImage:=oDim:width*oDim:height*4
hbitmap:=CreateDIBSection(hMemDC,@bmi,DIB_RGB_COLORS,pBits,NULL,0)
SelectObject(hMemDC,hbitmap)
So im out of options... Has anyone an idea, or a codesnippet that does work, so i can try that one?
Thanks,
Rozis
modified on Sunday, June 28, 2009 5:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
I've been working in C# and Java for a while, with only a little experience in using C++, and I'm having a little trouble finding information on if there is anything like base or super in C++. If for example I have this:
class foo {
public:
virtual void myMethod() { cout << "this part is in foo" << endl; }
};
class bar : public foo {
public:
void myMethod() { base.myMethod(); cout << "\tthis part is in bar" << endl; }
};
Such that, base.myMethod() would perform the tasks of myMethod() in the base class, and then it would carry out the new implementation from there; is anything like this possible in C++?
thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. Just use the base's name:
class bar : public foo {
public:
void myMethod() { foo::myMethod(); cout << "\tthis part is in bar" << endl; }
};
There's no specific keyword, since C++ allows multiple inheritance and therefore it is not guaranteed that one class has one and only one base class.
Regards.
Stupidity is an International Association - Enrique Jardiel Poncela
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks  ! Going back to C++ continues to remind me how different it really is from C#
|
|
|
|
|
Visual C++ provides a non-standard keyword __super[^] that does that. Not that I recommend it
|
|
|
|
|
To expand on Fernando's answer - you can't really have a 'base' or 'super' keyword in C++ because a C++ class can inherit from multiple non-abstract bases.
Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I'm trying to save image from webBrowser control after a open webpage.
It is like right clicking on the picture and clicking at "Save Picture As..." Context menu, except I wanted to do it
programmaticaly with out showing save dialog box.
I tried
this->webBrowser1->Document->execcommand("Save As", false, strFilePath);
it does not work.
Some one Knows better way?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
im using the below code to increase the size of the DialogBox along with the controls inside it during Runtime...ie im overriding DoModal()function...
CTestDlg is my application name....
INT_PTR CTestDlg::DoModal()
{
CDialogTemplate dlt;
int nResult;
// load dialog template
//CTestDlg::IDD is the ID of my resoource...
if (!dlt.Load(MAKEINTRESOURCE(CTestDlg::IDD))) return -1;
// set your own font, for example "Arial", 10 pts.
dlt.SetFont(L"Arial", 12);
// get pointer to the modified dialog template
LPSTR pdata = (LPSTR)GlobalLock(dlt.m_hTemplate);
// let MFC know that you are using your own template
m_lpszTemplateName = NULL;
InitModalIndirect(pdata);
// display dialog box
nResult = CDialog::DoModal();
// unlock memory object
GlobalUnlock(dlt.m_hTemplate);
return nResult;
}
The issue is the font of one of the control (CheckBox) is not getting increased...
Please let me know...
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
i know it might be a basic question but still i have to ask as i didnt find it that how i can replace " with \"
Thanks A Ton
Ash_VCPP
walking over water is just knowing where the stones are.....
|
|
|
|
|
If you are trying to insert a backslash using a string literal you need to escape the character. The escape character is of course a backslash so that means you need two consecutive to produce one.
"\\"
Otherwise I have no idea what you are trying to do.
|
|
|
|
|
You can use CString::Replace or string::find and string::replace.
«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not a C++ programmer, but I have some work to do with fixing a Memory Leak. I created a reference to an object called myObject:
myObject = CreateObject();
right?
So if I recreate that myObject by using:
myObject = CreateObject();
Again and it creates a new object will it overwrite that memory space and destroy the old object or do I have to delete myObject first and then write to that reference again?
Thanks for your help, I've been looking everywhere for this.
|
|
|
|
|
You have to delete the previously created object before creating a new object.
If you have used new or new[] inside CreateObject you have to call delete or delete[] respectively.
If malloc is used, you have to call free.
If it is a COM object, you have to call its Release method.
«_Superman_»
I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
