|
Yes.
Next best is to relabel "All statuses" to "non-members" or "turned down."
Jon
'When once a republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.' ~ Montesquieu
Soap Box 1.0: the first, the original, reborn troll-less
|
|
|
|
|
Just fixed this. Uploading now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I am impressed at the length of your ToDo list {grin}
Remember in November:
But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security.
|
|
|
|
|
And he's as aggravating a little tit as ever. Clickety[^].
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The last few weeks/months our own messages are getting a slightly different color.
But now I notice reply's to those messages are getting that same color, is this by design?
(I noticed on your (Chris) reply to previous post here)
|
|
|
|
|
The message subject is also a permalink address. Any message you post redirects to the permalink, any message you reply to via email you click the permalink. In both cases it is then shown in the clicked url color.
The latest nation. Procrastination.
|
|
|
|
|
Should have know that
|
|
|
|
|
Don't feel too bad. When it 1st started happening there were loungers who wouldn't accept that was the cause.
The latest nation. Procrastination.
|
|
|
|
|
Subject says it all
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry - it was a little delayed this morning. It's on its way now.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hamster had a night out in the town again yesterday? Damn that union
|
|
|
|
|
My friend was recently looking for a web monitoring service - where (for a fee) you enter a url and it will be checked each day (hour?) to make sure it is still up and accessible; if not, an alert will be sent via email or sms.
So I looked in the CP catalog, but there is no category for "Services". You may want to add this.
|
|
|
|
|
We've deliberately tried to avoid extremely open-ended categories like "services" since every man and his dog will plonk their service (web service, backup service, care hire service, questionable rodents in latex service etc) in their.
Would a more flexible tagging system be more useful? In think about it I would have thought "Hosting" or "Web Development" might be appropriate (though maybe not) but the ability to add a "Monitoring" tag may help.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: every man and his dog will plonk their service
What if someone adds a detective novel in Books & Training? Or adds a photo library of nude women under Graphics & 3D Modeling? Adding a Services category would require the same scrutiny as the categories you already have. Haven't you already removed some catalog entries as being inappropriate?
IMHO, I think that by not having a Services category you are deciding that you do not want the ad revenue of service providers.
P.S. Where are you going to put the cloud services catalog entries?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not saying a services category would encourage inappropriate content. I'm saying a services category probably isn't narrow enough to encourage people to properly classify their entries correctly.
I'm also definitely not trying to say we have enough, or the correct categories. Cloud Hosting would fit in Web Hosting, or if it's non HTTP related then we could probably use a Web Services category.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, I see your point. Yes, calling it Web Services would probably be better.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I'm trying to upload my article using article submission wizard, but step 2 won't load - I could wait forever.
What can I do ?
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please try again? I've just done a small site update and you may have been caught in the middle of that.
I've tested the wizard and it's working fine for me at the moment.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Still, it doesn't work, neither on IE8 nor FF3.5. Request is send immediately, but I get no reply... ok, I get a one reply for 10 send requests. I don't use any proxies, firewalls, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
I think this is network problem, because the wizard works, when using proxy server. I do not know why, without a proxy server set, everything works fine except the wizard.
Traceroute to www.codeproject.com is:
<br />
Trasa śledzenia do www.codeproject.com [69.10.233.10]<br />
przewyższa maksymalną liczbę przeskoków 30<br />
<br />
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1<br />
2 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.0.1<br />
3 1 ms 2 ms 3 ms 88-199-169-***.tktelekom.pl [88.199.169.***]<br />
4 3 ms 1 ms 2 ms 88-199-219-253.tktelekom.pl [88.199.219.253]<br />
5 * 2 ms 3 ms 212.73.253.237<br />
6 16 ms 17 ms 17 ms ae-5-5.ebr2.Berlin1.Level3.net [4.69.134.18]<br />
7 30 ms 23 ms 26 ms ae-3-3.ebr2.Dusseldorf1.Level3.net [4.69.133.146<br />
]<br />
8 23 ms 23 ms 23 ms ae-1-100.ebr1.Dusseldorf1.Level3.net [4.69.141.1<br />
49]<br />
9 27 ms 26 ms 26 ms ae-2-2.ebr2.Frankfurt1.Level3.net [4.69.132.138]<br />
<br />
10 117 ms 116 ms 117 ms ae-43-43.ebr2.Washington1.Level3.net [4.69.137.5<br />
8]<br />
11 133 ms 133 ms 134 ms ae-2-2.ebr2.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.132.69]<br />
12 140 ms 144 ms 144 ms ae-5.ebr2.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.140.193]<br />
13 135 ms 134 ms 135 ms ae-24-54.car4.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.68.101.104]<br />
<br />
14 133 ms 134 ms 133 ms PEER-1-NETW.car4.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.71.102.9<br />
8]<br />
15 145 ms 146 ms 144 ms oc48-po1-0.tor-1yg-cor-1.peer1.net [216.187.114.<br />
142]<br />
16 145 ms 144 ms 145 ms 10ge.xe-0-0-0.tor-151f-cor-1.peer1.net [216.187.<br />
114.134]<br />
17 143 ms 143 ms 144 ms oc48-po7-0.tor-151f-dis-1.peer1.net [216.187.114<br />
.149]<br />
18 147 ms 146 ms 147 ms 65.39.201.132<br />
19 147 ms 148 ms 148 ms 69-10-224-202.onx.com [69.10.224.202]<br />
20 148 ms 148 ms 148 ms 69-10-224-120.onx.com [69.10.224.120]<br />
21 147 ms 146 ms 147 ms www.codeproject.com [69.10.233.10]<br />
<br />
Śledzenie zakończone.<br />
modified on Sunday, September 27, 2009 9:46 AM
|
|
|
|
|
The wizard is on the same servers as the rest of the site so there's no reason I can think of for there to be a difference in how things work. I'm puzzled.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Just give up. The wizard is evil.
|
|
|
|
|
Okay, I added my technical blog to the site, and the articles are getting pulled in and I can view them here, but they are not showing up when browsing blog posts or in search. Is there something else that needs to be done?
|
|
|
|
|
New Blogs, like new articles, go through a moderation process. Once a gold (or above) member has checked and approved the article it will appear on the site.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|