|
Please note I did not offer ANY help on that subject - it does not make any sense to me so I concentrated on the other areas hoping they may have an impact on your results.
To me a query cannot return inconsistent results!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, that's my core question. even if my table design is not good, even if SQL may internally converting date into float or even if i need to put 'ASC' after Order By, still question remains same. Why on earth SQL query is not consistent? Why not it's producing same results 100 out of 100 times? Is that means any internal bug in the SQL Server? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, based on the query results, within a loop creating new records and putting into a new SQL table 'Timesheet'. Now, when I see this new table 'Timesheet', it's rows are not created based on that sorting. For example, output of the query I got as 1/1/2012 to 1/31/2012 and now in the new table, inserting records like :
1/1/2012 - 51 - 12
1/2/2012 - 10 - 13
1/3/2012 - 15 - 20
..... till
1/31/2012 - 40 - 30
Now, sometimes (as I said earlier), it's creating rows in 'Timesheet' table that looks like:
1/12/2012 - 10 -20
1/13/2012 - 15-12
.. then
1/31/2012 - 40 - 30
..then
1/1/2012 - 51 - 12
1/2/2012 - 10 - 13
1/3/2012 - 15 - 20
It's not that all errors are starting from 1/12/2012, it can be 10th or 15th. So no possible pattern in these output which are giving error.
May be it will give more light into this matter. thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
..and the table "timesheet" holds the day as a VARCHAR? That's not a bug, that's by design. Strings are sorted depending on the settings, should have been DATE type.
|
|
|
|
|
No sir, the sorting is made on 'ToDate' column which is of Date type, not varchar type, as I already given my column types before.
|
|
|
|
|
AnirbanM 2 wrote: No sir, the sorting is made on 'ToDate' column which is of Date type, not varchar type, as I already given my column types before.
Still, it sorts like it would be. Can you create a TSQL-script that reproduces the problem? Seems I can't, my dates keep returning ordered in a way that could be expected;
DECLARE @TEST TABLE (SD DATE);
INSERT INTO @TEST (SD) VALUES ('20010101');
INSERT INTO @TEST (SD) VALUES ('20011010');
INSERT INTO @TEST (SD) VALUES ('20010310');
INSERT INTO @TEST (SD) VALUES ('20010210');
INSERT INTO @TEST (SD) VALUES ('20010301');
INSERT INTO @TEST (SD) VALUES ('20010201');
SELECT * FROM @TEST ORDER BY SD;
Results:
2001-01-01
2001-02-01
2001-02-10
2001-03-01
2001-03-10
2001-10-10
|
|
|
|
|
I would think the error is happening after the query is returned. Test the query in SQL alone and see if you get the error you describe.
|
|
|
|
|
AnirbanM 2 wrote: Please suggest where is the problem, thanks to all in advance.
Some posssible reasons.
- The problem originates from some other place in the code. So nothing to do with the code that you posted. And one very obvious possibility is that there is code somewhere that is sorting based on alphabetic ("10", "11" versus "1", "2) instead of using the sort that you gave.
- You are not looking at the actual data.
- You are not running the code that you think you are.
|
|
|
|
|
hi every one
i'm not sure if it's true to brought my question here but I want to make clear how much Datawarehouse is useful for a company.what i want is a query example in sql which is long and hard for operational database and is a piece of cake for analytical database.
I've searched a lot but I can't fine one may be I searched wrongly but I would be so thanks full if any one could help me with this as soon as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of trying to find a "query" difference try researching the uses of the different types of database, a datawharehouse is a snapshot, usually delayed from real time, of the transaction (OLPT) database that is optimised for reporting (querying).
It is not an either/or question, once you reporting queries begin impacting on your transaction processing you need an OLAP solution as well as the OLTP.
This is a very simplistic view, there are entire libraries written on this subject!
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
thanks so much,i almost know what you are talking about. but I really want a query .
this is a an extract from a book :"Although many decision-support queries can be written in SQL, others either
cannot be expressed in SQL or cannot be expressed easily in SQL."
I want an example of this kind of query which is written in both.
|
|
|
|
|
a.fatemeh wrote: I want an example of this kind of query which is written in both.
Good luck with that, even if you could get the examples it would take a lot explaining to get the context of the requirement. You might want to look into the Microsoft example databases, they have various OLTP and OLAP dbs (AdventureWorks etc), there may be such comparative examples based on them but I doubt it.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
thanks by the way.
it seems I'd hardly find one.
|
|
|
|
|
i have made a network group and i have installed sql in server pc so i m having problem of instance name while logging in sql management stdio in other network pc's ... plx give any solution to this prblm
|
|
|
|
|
As we are not telepathic we cannot help you without knowing what the error is. Try giving us some detail on the error message you are getting!
The instance name is the name you gave the server when installing OR then name/IP of the server you installed it on.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
We are discussing a new project that will do lots of word matching, including some fuzzy logic in the matching.
We are deciding between using SQL and ACL for this job, and I've been told that SQL has more fuzzy logic facilities than ACL.
Anyone know about this or what the additional fuzzy facilities are?
Thanks in advance - Ben
|
|
|
|
|
That's a pretty broad assumption. What variant of SQL database are you talking about here, because different engines have different features?
|
|
|
|
|
Currently we're using Microsoft SQL Server 2008 but could upgrade to the latest for this project.
|
|
|
|
|
At the most basic, you're talking about Soundex matching, which isn't great. You might want to consider Full Text Indexing, which will return misspelled items if they are close enough. Of course, you can always implement your own fuzzy logic inside SQL Server, using CLR functions.
|
|
|
|
|
I have the following query:
select CASE when EA.Address1 <> '' and EA.Address2 <> '' and EA.Address3 <> '' then Replace(EA.Address2, ',' , ' ') + '' + Replace(EA.Address3, ',' , ' ')
else EA.Address1 end as employeeaddress
from EmployeeAdress EA
However employeeaddress should hold a maximum of 35 characters irrespective the number of characters in columns Address1, Address2, Address3.
Any advice how to do this?
Thanks
Berba 
|
|
|
|
|
Try:
SELECT LEFT(CASE ... END, 35) As EmployeeAddress ...
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. It works
|
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
We want to disable the windows authentication mode in the sql server, because we use the sql authentication and we don't want the user to login from the management studio using windows authentication.
so we need a sql script to disable the windows authentication from our windows application, what is the script please.
Thanks all
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rather certain that isn't possible nor logically advisable.
SQL Server supports Windows authentication and as an option SQL identification. The later is an option the former isn't.
Additionally you seem to think that you can disallow access to SQL server completely. Which suggests that you think that there will never be problems that need investigation. Which is unlikely to be true.
If you don't trust your users then either address that at the management level or the contract level. And don't try to solve it with technology.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
