|
I seriously doubt the approval process since last month or so.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
Likewise.
To be a moderator, I think you should have gold Author - nothing else is important.
That way, only the people who write good articles decide if it's suitable.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: To be a moderator, I think you should have gold Author - nothing else is important.
That way, only the people who write good articles decide if it's suitable.
Are you suggesting that all gold authors are writing good articles.
Some of them just write many.
But then again, I don't have any better suggestions at the moment.
|
|
|
|
|
No, but it's somewhere to start - at least people who get to gold know how much work is involved in writing a good article!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: at least people who get to gold should know how much work is involved in writing a good article!
FTFY
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Then the last month was quite long. The 'article' has been published nearly 3 years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm talking about all the cases. We've seen too many such Article/Tip getting approved recently. Looks like Approval mechanism needs some improvements.
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
I would like to see the mechanism changed too and have already complained.
It was just my note that this example does not fit.
|
|
|
|
|
I've spoken to Chris about increasing the reputation requirement for being able to report articles in the queue. In the meantime, please always report any articles you find as Extremely Poor Quality or Inaccurate/Misleading. They will be accessed and removed if need be.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
On the other hand, the standard was much lower when I joined ten years ago. My early articles wouldn't pass muster today. Nor are they worth re-writing today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
leonafra - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|
|
spammers account now closed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
spammers account now closed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
btw, Plagiarised scores a red wriggle. hmmm.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
For some reason, I read perp as twerp.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
Works just as well.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Member 12271272 - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
User: Member 10891848 - Professional Profile - CodeProject[^]
Messages (58): Latest Messages - CodeProject[^]
Posting irrelevant replies to forum messages like "I agree", "Why" and some voting posts (which may be faked).
The spam is inside his message signature which contains seven links to commercial pages (all the same domain).
[EDIT]
To explain in detail what he is doing:
He has posted a bunch of comments during the last days in short time (about one post per minute) to new or updated articles.
[/EDIT]
modified 18-Jan-16 9:02am.
|
|
|
|