|
|
In all honesty though, he has some very good points. People who screw the rules and do their own thin at their jobs get fired (at least they should...), so why should something like this be any different? He could have said it better, but as he said: "on the internet, nobody can hear you being subtle".
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open source is like open range; you never know what you might run (or step) into.
|
|
|
|
|
Open Source means that the source code is freely given. Linux is Open Source. Open Source in this context is nothing more than a policy regarding ther safe storage of the source code.
Any phylosophical onanism adds nothing, and Mr. torvalds knows it. He's managing a project, huge project, and learnt better than to let any hippie wannabee h4x0r screw around with that.
Look at Slackware, one of the best Linux distibution available: its creator managed it with iron fist and full control, and there isn't a single Slackware version which is not up to standard.
* CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
* GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
* Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game.
* I'm a puny punmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
I do support, clean code and well defined processes, however Torvalds forgot that he does NOT own Linux... It is open source... If the community members will to support the development process are not up to the level he's expecting, what can we say? Linux not attractive? Torvalds bullying too much?
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
We need more people like him, IMO.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
I’ve heard a bit of conventional wisdom in the software industry. It holds that people will read a given line of code an order of magnitude more times than they’ll modify it. I only use single-character variables to help people understand my code
|
|
|
|
|
So if I read 20 lines of code, but only think a couple of them are bad, there's something wrong with me?
But what if I read 20 lines that are all good?
Am I therefore terrible?
What assumptions are we supposed to start from, here?
I've read a lot more good code than bad code*.
* Note that I stay away from QA specifically to maintain that status quo
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Some of that is obvious, but when he presents:
var distinctCoordinatesBelow = _window.GetAll<T>().Where(c => c.Location.Y > LabelYCoordinate).OrderBy(c => c.Location.Y).Select(c => c.Location.Y).Distinct();
As an example of an undesirable LINQ chain he lost me. Any reasonable programmer would write:
var distinctCoordinatesBelow = _window.GetAll<T>()
.Where(c => c.Location.Y > LabelYCoordinate)
.OrderBy(c => c.Location.Y)
.Select(c => c.Location.Y)
.Distinct();
Which is much, much more readable.
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Is your code hard to understand
Yes.
int _,__,___; 
Hum. Wasn't supposed to have space b/n _ ARGGGGG. CODEproj3ct...
The best way to make your dreams come true is to wake up.
Paul Valery
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Erik Dietrich,
All code is hard to understand. Picking apart language idiomatic syntax is irrelevant because any and all language syntax obscures, dissects, decouples, entangles, abstracts, simplifies, modifies, and otherwise complicates the initial intent, which is usually simply stated in any spoken language of your choice.
If it were not so, we wouldn't need unit testing, QA departments, and lawyers (at least for software bugs that kill people and waste millions of dollars of tax payer's money when Mars satellites and rovers go boom or missing.)
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Spiceworks survey shows positive workplace relationships rank above money as key to job satisfaction. "You don't have to be crazy to work here, but it helps!"
|
|
|
|
|
For something to be Turing complete, it must be able to solve every problem solvable by any other computer that exists or that could be imagined to exist (such as a Turing machine). And now your life is Turing complete
|
|
|
|
|
The first sentence: Quote: The condition of Turing completeness is almost always explained in terms of the Turing machine
Is it any wonder that I lost interest before reading the second sentence?
It's a unit of measurement, you F*****G moron!
All units of measurement are arbitrary -- but without them, we'd not be able to declare them arbitrary!
Temperature?
It's arbitrarily based on the changes of state of the H2O molecule.
So yes, the condition of how hot it is almost always explained in terms of the hotness of H2O
Distance?
It's arbitrarily based on the length of a thumb, the length of an unnamed person's foot, the disance light can travel in a given time if it's unaffected by gravity/whatever, etc.
So yes, the condition of how far is almost always explained in terms of the any of the above.
<{sigh}> Can't they get someone who's been alive for more than ten minutes to write "articles"?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Companies can technically buy a quantum computer right now, but it's not really the same as a general-purpose computer. It just keeps printing 42,no matter what you ask
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: It just keeps printing 42,no matter what you ask
Perhaps, but the machine it will design...
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Really! The portable code format should be turned on by default in Firefox and Chrome by the end of the month, with Edge and Safari to follow And the hacks should be around shortly
|
|
|
|
|
Social media sites like Twitter, Facebook and Pinterest are causing more people to feel alone, according to US psychologists. "Though the place is crowded, you still can find some room"
|
|
|
|
|
With 200 Facebook friends how can I be lonely? 
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
I've got 201, you're a total loser 
This is the part where you cry out in agony "WHY DOES NOBODY LOVE MEEE!???  "
|
|
|
|
|
And I was just starting to feel better about myself. Woe is me! 
New version: WinHeist Version 2.2.2 Beta I told my psychiatrist that I was hearing voices in my head. He said you don't have a psychiatrist!
|
|
|
|
|
I've got 0. And I intend to keep it that way. (I don't have an account with FB, nor will I ever have an account with them)
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I was like that up until about two years ago.
Decided to take a LinkedIn account, shortly after a FB account and even a Twitter account.
Twitter is totally useless. LinkedIn has brought me some interesting offers. Facebook let me re-connect with some old friends and there are some interesting reads on my timeline now and then.
Overall I don't regret it. It's not the medium that's evil, but how people use it. Even though I'm on FB I'm still not interested in 100 pictures of your baby (my #1 annoyance) 
|
|
|
|
|
200's way too many, when you consider that the numerical representation of the usefulness of a person is inversely proportional to the number of their "likes"/"follows"*.
You should brag about having -200, not +200.
* Wal's rule 957
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
