|
Member 11178239 wrote: Sadly I don't quite understand the value of remarks made by jeron1, they didn't help or add anything valuable to the discussion, perhaps I missed something or maybe an inside joke or something
No - I missed it too (need sleep!)
He wrote his "I small sarcasm" to my "We'll follow up with the Verizon issue. Being a telco I'm sure they have courteous, responsive and technical competent tech support who are easy to get hold of.". And he was 100% right: I was being a tad sarcastic. Dealing with Telecom companies is a form of torture.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a long-standing bug where two members somehow end up with the same username but different IDs. It's been reported many times, but there doesn't seem to have been any progress on fixing it yet.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Then for a spam article which user Id we should report.One just below the heading or one with the author name
|
|
|
|
|
The one under the heading that includes the member ID (mid=...) is unambiguous. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
This question [^] is now deleted, apparently by me. But all I did was edit to insert pre-tags.
Can it be reinstated
|
|
|
|
|
Tried to update it but it's still marked deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
Same for me.
But the revision just got +1 in your and in my edit.
Not sure how chill60 did it, but the behaviour is a bit weird in my opinion
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Trust me - I have no idea either! 
I tried to Rollback to V1 and it just upped the revision number but left it as deleted
|
|
|
|
|
I told you, you should not feed the hamsters after midnight
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
...or get them wet.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hehe [^]
"I'm neither for nor against, on the contrary." John Middle
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5M people popped out for a nature break. They weren't gone long.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Did you feel a great disturbance in the force? 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Let's not go there...
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Nowadays "a caching issue" is responsible for everything I think, at least here
|
|
|
|
|
Who knows... botnet attack? 
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
This I experienced at "CP Home":
1.) Under "Our Cummunity" you see about the six latest posts.
2.) Now in case you click one, _and_the one starts exactly at the second,third,... page's top you will _not_ come to the expected topic.
I recognized this first on the post The Lounge[^], ok that is now not longer important.
Sorry 1: To @jorgen_andersson, I used your The Lounge[^] to verify it
Sorry 2: I think my explanation is hard to understand.
IE11, W8.1
Regards
[Edit]
My Settings
Spacing: Relaxed
Layout: Normal
Per Page: 25
modified 12-Dec-17 15:41pm.
|
|
|
|
|
We need a way to identify posts as "Liberal BullSh*t".
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Why stop there? Why not add "Conservative bullshit", "Right-wing nut-job", etc?
Simple solution: If you don't like seeing other people's views expressed freely, then don't visit the Soapbox. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Wow - we're touchy today, aren't we?
".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
Touchy or not, his post is getting the up-votes so somebody obviously agrees with him
|
|
|
|
|
Touchy? I'm not the one who's suggesting that posts he disagrees with have a special flag so he doesn't have to read them.
I appreciate your suggestion was probably meant as a joke, but this isn't really the right place for it.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
And another one for blatant cronyism?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
