|
After killing your account, pouring salt on the bones and destroying by fire, there's still a small window of opportunity to recover that account, so its email isn't clear for another couple of weeks.
Email me the email you want to reclaim and the email you currently use and I'll clean it up.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: After killing your account, pouring salt on the bones and destroying by fire, there's still a small window of opportunity to
Someone likes Supernatural?  
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly!
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I tried. The email didn't work:
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
<chris' email="" address=""> Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery.
The following organization rejected your message: aspmx.l.google.com.
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: mail.notifications.codeproject.com
|
|
|
|
|
You tried chris@codeproject.com?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, the following advisory text is not visually separated from the article content:
Theoretically, it would be possible for a spammer to add this text to the top of their article to try to get it past the moderators. It would only involve adding a single class to a paragraph at the top of their article.
It's currently the equivalent of adding "This message is from a trusted sender, and definitely not spam!" to the top of an email message. Or displaying a "100% secure" message next to a padlock image on an HTTP site.
Ideally, this message should be displayed in an area of the page which the author cannot control.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: Ideally, this message should be displayed in an area of the page which the author cannot control.
And the editorial notes too, please
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll add a clear marker to differentiate non-sponsored from sponsored.
The issue is that no matter what we do, new and casual readers will still be potentially misled by anything posted within an article. We can have an "official sponsored article" badge and all that, but unless a reader has actually seen that in action they won't know what to look for.
The best defence here is you guys: you spot something wrong, you report and nuke. You're way better at this, collectively, than we or our systems can ever be.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: new and casual readers will still be potentially misled
But new and casual readers aren't likely to be looking at articles in the moderation queue. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored or promoted items never appear in the moderation queue.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The one I posted a screenshot of did. 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
touche!
You don't happen to remember the title or URL do you?
As a rule, no one other than admins can post sponsored content, so anything with that warning should be reported. If one of us messed up the posting and it entered the pending queue then you are within your rights to point and laugh at us.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It was this one:
Zeroing the Center of a CompositeTransform[^]
Which is weird, because that's now showing as a blog post.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: Which is weird, because that's now showing as a blog post.
If you have a look to the versions... I suppose Sean, Chris or Deeksha already corrected it from the very beginning. All versions are done by CP Staff
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get notifications anymore when someone replies to my messages. I mean this red number icon/flag.
Is it a thing of profile settings?
Btw: "Send me an e-mail when someone replies to my messages" is unchecked, because I don't like to have it as mail.
E.g. this where OP replies correctly https://www.codeproject.com/Questions/5247812/How-to-load-a-pdf-file-inside-a-form-using-Csharp but I did not receive any notification.
[Edit]
One thing more, I do not find this message in the "rep list" which I usually use to navigate here
Thanks in advance.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I'll have a look to see why you aren't getting your expected notifications ....
"Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana."
|
|
|
|
|
Sir, thank you very much for this reanimation 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks working again. Thank you very much.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I was re-reading a question of mine[^] and the answer / comments on it, when I noticed a "that shouldn't be like that"
AFAIK (and in other questions of mine is like this), the green background comes with a red button "reject this solution", and the standard background with the green button "accept solution"
Green background and green button... it shouldn't be like that.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 5-Oct-19 15:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
If you look closely, there are two different "Green backgrounds":
The darker green is an "Accepted" solution, the lighter green is a "Good" solution, based on purely on the number of "Star Votes" (I think it's "three 5's == light green", but don't quote me on that, I haven't had my coffee yet).
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
mmm... sounds plausible...
Didn't notice, thanks
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Bingo
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed that I have an article in my reading list. I haven't bookmarked it or anything else so how can I get rid of it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
I found the article from "My Bookmarks", removed it and now the reading list is gone.
Not sure what happened since I don't recall bookmarking that article 
And I do have other bookmarks but that was the only one shown in the reading list. Perhaps only new ones are shown...
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
