|
Thanks a lot for that information!
It is interesting to see that you assume 16" (0.4 m) length, which would fit into most modern Norwegian wood stoves. We still go by 24" (60 cm), which was the old standard with huge wood stoves, but much too large for modern ones. The 60 cm logs must be halved to fit in. If firewood wrere marketed in 40 cm size, we would avoid a lot of cutting!
|
|
|
|
|
using bit.ly?
C'mon Microsoft... 90% of their links are not working anymore or pointing to other places
M.D.V. 
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
that's 10% higher than if they were linking directly to their own content from more than 6 months ago. 
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
I pretty get almost all the "internal" links to work, many manual editions but still possible to make them work (some 404 though)
But there are a few series ".Net Essentials", "Modern Apps" and a couple more, mostly in "newer" issues (I would say from 2014 upwards) that rely a lot in bit.ly, iltic.com and other url shorteners... and those are failing in a huge % of the cases.
And I can't really find a logical reason, why the hell should be url-shorteners in such a publication. The length of the links is unrelevant, just change the "caption" and that is.
But hey... we speak about Microsoft. (Although being fair, here would be possible to name a lot of big companies)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
you have discovered MSDN is an unsalvageable train wreck, you have joined a multitude: i am sorry/
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry about that - when they archived the MSDN Magazine, they lcased all the bit.ly links, breaking many. I had reported it (and they told me they fixed it). Which pages are you still seeing them on?
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
I can't say for sure right now, I would say around 12 non-working links in the 2017 issues (almost all the extern links). I can confirm tomorrow when I am back at work.
I can give you a list if you want. I have made a list for my own to avoid wondering why I don't have an example and searching again for it in the future.
Being a bit imaginative and looking at the system used to do the links I have been able to correct many of the problems with the internally archivated zip-files. I.e. missing the "vb" in "vbcode_XXXXX", having the wrong month (maybe same code valid for two monthly articles? I am not sure)...
I didn't make any notice about these solvable errors, but I would estimate there is a minimum 5% aprox. of wrong intern links.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If you have the time, a list would be good. I'll hopefully be able to get those cleaned up.
Internal links also? Dang. Those should all be 301ing to their new home on Docs. ugh.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: If you have the time, a list would be good. I'll hopefully be able to get those cleaned up.
Send me a private email to this message, so I get an address to write you back
Kent Sharkey wrote: Internal links also? Dang.
Yeah, but I have no list for that.
I have been downloading everything, so at least we can know what is still there. But the internal links that needed to be modify... I could go through again and and do a list, but that will need more time (priority for the 2nd round not that high).
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Live example found right now:
Using: MSDN Magazine Issues | Microsoft Docs[^] as main link.
I am now downloading 2018.
Link 2018, January, Digital Download is wrongly set to: download.microsoft.com/download/5/8/c/58c4e6cf-c261-4428-9529-9f0f8c2478da/mo_1701q1.pdf
I just opened the link of February 2018: download.microsoft.com/download/c/6/9/c6938ba7-02cf-49d0-b7bf-88fd88a04024/0218msdn_emag.pdf
and tried changing the second digit in the pdf name to:
download.microsoft.com/download/c/6/9/c6938ba7-02cf-49d0-b7bf-88fd88a04024/0118msdn_emag.pdf
I was successful and got the issue for January
And this is something I have done many times in different issues or code examples
EDIT: The extra Connect magazine 2018 has no clickety, I just tried
download.microsoft.com/download/c/6/9/c6938ba7-02cf-49d0-b7bf-88fd88a04024/1318msdn_emag.pdf
and it worked.
EDIT2: 2018 May. All Bit.ly links not working. Either 404 not found or they go to other websites that have nothing to do with programming.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 25-Mar-20 4:48am.
|
|
|
|
|
...The Times are rough! 
Ba-tish!
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
The Post will give you splinters!
I'm hiding from exercise...I'm in the fitness protection program.
JaxCoder.com
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that would be a pain in the... nevermind! 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
I'm going to give you a 9/10 for a very good dad joke 
Every day, thousands of innocent plants are killed by vegetarians.
Help end the violence EAT BACON
|
|
|
|
|
Only use The Sun if it shines out your ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
gave up on print newspapers; on-line news only
still haven't really got the hang of e-wiping my ass.
pestilence [ pes-tl-uh ns ] noun
1. a deadly or virulent epidemic disease. especially bubonic plague.
2. something that is considered harmful, destructive, or evil.
Synonyms: pest, plague, people
|
|
|
|
|
Just use the Three Seashells, like everyone else does!
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pravda and Izvestia were rough?
Soviet joke: In Pravda [Truth] there is no izvestia [news], and in Izvestia there is no pravda.
|
|
|
|
|
You just wait until you run out of newspapers and have to use sandpaper...
|
|
|
|
|
Wait until you run out of sandpaper and have to use Izal[^]... 
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I had to look that stuff up.
Some of the old-time ads for it are downright hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
I thought I'd try one of these "toilet brushes" instead.
I don't recommend it, they're very messy and quite painful.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I can imagine![^] 
Anything that is unrelated to elephants is irrelephant
Anonymous
-
The problem with quotes on the internet is that you can never tell if they're genuine
Winston Churchill, 1944
-
Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.
Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
|
Stout clubs put loner off(9)
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
