|
|
|
|
| .
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
| .
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
| .
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
| .
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first article has been there since January, 24th 2012. And the second since June, 1st 2012. At that time it is possible that the rules were not as clearly established as today regarding article and tip/trick distinction.
I don't think Michael has misused anything.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
28th January, 2015: Initial version
1st July, 2013: Initial version
Drove into attention without any note of what has changed.
Sorry for me it is abuse. But ok he is a high rep member like you so please strike out my report.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I cannot strike any report, and it is your absolute right to flag an article when you think it has been mis-categorized. My only concern about your post is that I do not think it is an abuse from the author.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
Ok. Thanks, I strike it out myself  Thank you again.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Message Closed
modified 27-Mar-20 4:57am.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Michael, you're preaching to the choir here 
Kind regards.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Michael Haephrati מיכאל האפרתי
|
|
|
|
|
What a damn broth this choir is here. I can only throw up. 
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
You can throw up as much as you like, but not on my shoes 
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
Question: If you think this crap 'articles' are worth to count as articles it should be my future measurement? Ok I will follow the choir.... will I do it really, not sure.
It is not the first time that high rep mem go for high rep mem... and I hate it.
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
As I told you, you are entitled to your opinion and have the right to accordingly flag any article of which you think it has been wrongly categorized. I simply do not think these articles are crap, and I also am entitled to my opinion.
And your question does not make any sense to me, sorry for that 
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
If you look at the revisions you will see that quite a lot of the editing was done by CP staff. If they are happy for it to be published as an article then we should be too.
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Haephrati wrote: These are articles and not tips. I would have published them today.
Would you have published today, I would have gone for "wrong type" myself too.
Michael Haephrati wrote: The article about looking for a reliable hardware ID is based on a long research and real life project.
But the length of the annexed project / source code is not a criterium for article. It is the explanation you do about the source code what counts for me. If you published them today with that little explanation you should go for tip/trick or a project. At least, this is my opinion
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If they were new posts today, I would report as "wrong type", you can go for "incomplete" if you want a nuking kind of report but I don't see any reason to go for "abuse".
There is a bug too, I am not sure if you know about. Sometimes when CP-Staff (Editors like Deeksha or Sean or even Chris) edit a post, they get changed to an article. It often happens with blogs, but I have seen tip/tricks that get "promoted" to articles without the author knowing it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
