Click here to Skip to main content
14,668,213 members
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.
See more:
I have a code like this which executes in a different thread than main thread.
if(_isSTminStarted && (_stMinExpired == false))
                //wait till stMin is expired
                String message = string.Empty;
                    message = "Waiting till STmin expires " + DateTime.Now.ToString("h:mm:ss.fff");

                } while (_stMinExpired == false);               
                _isSTminStarted = true;

                CanFrame consecutiveFrame = _fragmentedFrameQueue.Dequeue();

Please see the do while loop , i have added that because i have to wait until a timer expires and _stMinExpired is set to true. Then only i should send next frame.

This flag is set when a System.threading.timer expires. But i don't think this is the ideal way to wait till that time. can you suggest some ways in which i can wait in this thread till that flag is set rather than putting do while loop.
Updated 12-May-17 7:39am
walterhevedeich 11-Aug-11 4:35am
I don't see any problem doing this, unless you don't want to log the message multiple times until _stMinExpired has been set to true.

Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.

Solution 2

Try using AutoResetEvent[^].
glued-to-code 11-Aug-11 5:14am
Yes this seems good, i can give it a try.
BobJanova 11-Aug-11 5:39am
Correct approach, 5.
glued-to-code 11-Aug-11 5:48am
Hi, Thanks Bob and Firo... This was exactly what i wanted and i have used it and is working as i expected. Thanks again.
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.

Solution 3

As Firo mentions, you want to use one of the event based wait handlers (AutoResetEvent or ManualResetEvent) for this. They are designed for exactly what you ask here: waiting until something happens in another thread at an unknown time.

class Test {
  AutoResetEvent waitHandle = new AutoResetEvent(false);

 void SpawnThread(){
  Thread t = new Thread(ThreadMethod);
 void ThreadMethod(){
  CanFrame consecutiveFrame = _fragmentedFrameQueue.Dequeue();

 void SomeLongOtherMethod(){
  waitHandle.Set(); // This will release the thread.

You should never wait by using a tight loop. That will run a core at 100% CPU and make your app unpopular. Wait handles, and Thread.Sleep as well, are OS level triggers and put your thread into a non-running state that doesn't use CPU time.
Rate this:
Please Sign up or sign in to vote.

Solution 1

Use Thread.Sleep[^] instead - it can wait for a specific time before your task does anything else.
glued-to-code 11-Aug-11 4:37am
But i don't have specific time until which i should put sleep. When the timer expires , i have to proceed further in the code. So in that case i can't put a sleep for specific time because a case can come where i neednot wait if timer has already expired.
OriginalGriff 11-Aug-11 5:08am
So instead sleep for 100ms, and check again, or kill your task and re-start it when the timer expires.
BobJanova 11-Aug-11 5:40am
This would work, but reset events are better if they can be used instead.
glued-to-code 11-Aug-11 5:49am
Thanks to both of you. i think Bob is right.

This content, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)

CodeProject, 503-250 Ferrand Drive Toronto Ontario, M3C 3G8 Canada +1 416-849-8900 x 100